The primary responsibility of the news media is to inform the public on all matters of importance to the general public, especially matters which affect the health and/or survival of people. And where necessary, to engage in serious investigative reporting ,when it is suspected that government agencies (or politicians) are involved in unlawful or criminal activities and cover ups.
None of this happened during the COVID Scamdemic, which was actually a Plandemic -- a planned pandemic in order to achieve specific goals hidden from the general public. Instead the mainstream media engaged in a serious campaign to misdirect and misinform people, while vigorously promoting fear and panic on a daily basis. These were criminal actions, yet no one has been held accountable.
Coronavirus (which is actually not a virus but a lab manufactured bio-weapon) was deliberately used to increase the number of deaths and so-called "cases" so that all governments could impose lockdowns, masking, social distancing, obsessive disinfection of surfaces, and the shutting down and killing off of businesses and churches (as well as millions of people). No one will be able to properly assess the colossal damage to nations and societies for absolutely no reason.
And this does not even take into account the suicides and mental health issues created by these tyrannical restrictions -- which had absolutely no effect on reducing infections (as many studies have shown). Nor does it take into account all the neglected surgeries and other medical issues which were not allowed to proceed normally. Thus it was a Plandemic orchestrated by all public health agencies throughout the "free world", while China orchestrated its own campaign to ensure that it would not be held liable for anything, including defective and substandard equipment and pharmaceuticals. or the release of the Wuhan or Chinese virus.
The deliberate suppression, sabotage, and undermining of cheap and effective treatments such as quinine, HCQ, the HCQ combo back (which included zinc and azithromycin or erythromycin), Vitamin D, Ivermectin, etc. by the medical, pharmaceutical, and public health establishment is the clearest proof that this was all planned in advance so that many would die unnecessarily. The way would then be prepared for the universal drive to have everyone injected with bogus "vaccines" (which had been hastily put together and given only emergency use approval by the FDA) which would rake in billions of dollars.
After that there would be a campaign for vaccine passports, so that people could not ever freely travel again. But above all the whole world would be ruled by FEAR. This is how a cabal of globalist elites would control humanity. And if anyone has any doubt about this, all they have to do is go to the World Economic Forum and read about the Great Reset, in which everything would be "re-imagined" for the benefit of a few.
Since there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that these biological/chemical cocktails are extremely dangerous and even fatal, the latest disinformation campaign by both pharmaceutical companies, public health officials, and the mainstream media is to IMMEDIATELY DISCOUNT any connection between serious adverse effects and/or deaths, and the vaccines themselves. This is criminality at its worst.
Everything connected with the COVID Plandemic is in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which forbids experimentation on human beings with drugs and chemicals using fraud, deceit, lack of informed consent, or lack of full disclosure (as well as many other stipulations). The CDC also violated the laws of the United States in falsely reporting on COVID. And the "vaccines" are all experimental. Thus a German lawyer (along with another 1,000 or more lawyers) is working on holding a Nuremberg 2 trial against all parties who have perpetrated this Scamdemic.
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
2. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
The Nuremberg Code
None of this happened during the COVID Scamdemic, which was actually a Plandemic -- a planned pandemic in order to achieve specific goals hidden from the general public. Instead the mainstream media engaged in a serious campaign to misdirect and misinform people, while vigorously promoting fear and panic on a daily basis. These were criminal actions, yet no one has been held accountable.
Coronavirus (which is actually not a virus but a lab manufactured bio-weapon) was deliberately used to increase the number of deaths and so-called "cases" so that all governments could impose lockdowns, masking, social distancing, obsessive disinfection of surfaces, and the shutting down and killing off of businesses and churches (as well as millions of people). No one will be able to properly assess the colossal damage to nations and societies for absolutely no reason.
And this does not even take into account the suicides and mental health issues created by these tyrannical restrictions -- which had absolutely no effect on reducing infections (as many studies have shown). Nor does it take into account all the neglected surgeries and other medical issues which were not allowed to proceed normally. Thus it was a Plandemic orchestrated by all public health agencies throughout the "free world", while China orchestrated its own campaign to ensure that it would not be held liable for anything, including defective and substandard equipment and pharmaceuticals. or the release of the Wuhan or Chinese virus.
The deliberate suppression, sabotage, and undermining of cheap and effective treatments such as quinine, HCQ, the HCQ combo back (which included zinc and azithromycin or erythromycin), Vitamin D, Ivermectin, etc. by the medical, pharmaceutical, and public health establishment is the clearest proof that this was all planned in advance so that many would die unnecessarily. The way would then be prepared for the universal drive to have everyone injected with bogus "vaccines" (which had been hastily put together and given only emergency use approval by the FDA) which would rake in billions of dollars.
After that there would be a campaign for vaccine passports, so that people could not ever freely travel again. But above all the whole world would be ruled by FEAR. This is how a cabal of globalist elites would control humanity. And if anyone has any doubt about this, all they have to do is go to the World Economic Forum and read about the Great Reset, in which everything would be "re-imagined" for the benefit of a few.
Since there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that these biological/chemical cocktails are extremely dangerous and even fatal, the latest disinformation campaign by both pharmaceutical companies, public health officials, and the mainstream media is to IMMEDIATELY DISCOUNT any connection between serious adverse effects and/or deaths, and the vaccines themselves. This is criminality at its worst.
Everything connected with the COVID Plandemic is in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which forbids experimentation on human beings with drugs and chemicals using fraud, deceit, lack of informed consent, or lack of full disclosure (as well as many other stipulations). The CDC also violated the laws of the United States in falsely reporting on COVID. And the "vaccines" are all experimental. Thus a German lawyer (along with another 1,000 or more lawyers) is working on holding a Nuremberg 2 trial against all parties who have perpetrated this Scamdemic.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical ExperimentsThe great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
2. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
The Nuremberg Code
