Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't think he was ViJ.....incidentally, I'm glad you are back on the boards.2 Corinthians 11:2 helps (I think) in asking who was Paul speaking to where he said “that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.” Was he speaking in a sexual content?
yes....keep goingI get the question wasn’t to me but it is said so often “the ones who have not been defiled with women”
but considering “that I might present you a pure virgin in Christ” …pure in Christ is the the only way I can think of “not defiled”.
you asked virgins from what? just important as “pure among women” is “And no lie was found in their mouth; they are blameless.”
1)first fruits to God and the Lamb (present you a pure virgin to Christ)
2)purchased
3)blameless
The 144 thousand virgins/eunuchs'?...will be Jews and will bring into the fold unsaved Jews...? They are pure...and obviously faithful as they "follow the Lamb..."...they follow the lamb wherever he goes... Revelation 14:4
how would you understand this?....don't answer too quickly
so its metaphor?....We can then look at the rest of the description as metaphor also I think. The question is, what is it a metaphor for or of?
I join in with threads only to have somebody make me feel stupid or out of my depth so I tend to try to stay away from the 'deep' stuff. Perhaps I need another cup of coffee. :)
why do you say they'll be Jews/ Eunuchs if its metaphor, Nancy?......and how do you understand 'pure'?The 144 thousand virgins/eunuchs'?...will be Jews and will bring into the fold unsaved Jews...? They are pure...and obviously faithful as they "follow the Lamb..."
?
If our ideas are too sacrosanct to be questioned we have an issue. Questioning for the honest enquirer is a means of discovering new and serendipitous things.me too Pat!
Although I'm willing to try now and again, even though I chance sticking foot in mouth or being WAY off topic!
Don't answer too quickly? I always answer quickly. I think it means to do whatever God tells us to do....they follow the lamb wherever he goes... Revelation 14:4
how would you understand this?....don't answer too quickly
Is the "new man" about whom Paul writes, a physical man of flesh and red blood? I think not! The new man [includes members of both natural genders] is chaste and pure... given now opportunity become a part of that a virginal Bride for the Bridegroom.2 Corinthians 11:2 helps (I think) in asking who was Paul speaking to where he said “that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.” Was he speaking in a sexual content?
I get the question wasn’t to me but it is said so often “the ones who have not been defiled with women”
but considering “that I might present you a pure virgin in Christ” …pure in Christ is the the only way I can think of “not defiled”.
you asked virgins from what? just important as “pure among women” is “And no lie was found in their mouth; they are blameless.”
1)first fruits to God and the Lamb (present you a pure virgin to Christ)
2)purchased
3)blameless
See post number 11
Thank you Robert but to be honest I'm not interested.See if this makes sense to you Pearl, it is my reply to Vicky: looking at the context in whole, and considering that Peter was married, we can discern what it is referring to. The entire previous chapter was about the beast, which it identifies as world powers, and how some would worship it, and then it contrasts beginning in chap 13 about those virgins, the 144k who follow the lamb, and then goes further to speak about babylon the great, who is later identified as committing fornication with the kings of the earth, so these virgins are virgins in the fact that they have not committed fornication with them.
why do you say they'll be Jews/ Eunuchs if its metaphor, Nancy?......and how do you understand 'pure'?
contrasts beginning in chap 13 about those virgins, the 144k who follow the lamb, and then goes further to speak about babylon the great, who is later identified as committing fornication with the kings of the earth, so these virgins are virgins in the fact that they have not committed fornication with them.
Is the "new man" about whom Paul writes, a physical man of flesh and red blood? I think not! The new man [includes members of both natural genders] is chaste and pure... given now opportunity become a part of that a virginal Bride for the Bridegroom.
Virgin... but also having their lamps ready: filled with oil!
"They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them:
But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.
While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept.
"And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.
Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps." Matt 25:3-7
"That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish." Eph 5:27
"That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me." John 17:21-23
Amen, sister, amen!The verse of the day this morning.
James 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
yes....keep going
so here we have what I see as a common dilemma.....how we understand. You are not sure but it seems the verses are clear you say.Not so sure it IS metaphor, or if maybe SOME of it is...just seems the verses are clear. I do not at all believe it will the the 144 K ONLY who enter the Kingdom as that would leave out ALL women and children.
you asked “Does this make sense maam?“
I think so…if I understood correctly then you don’t think it has anything to do with sexual content? but instead it is “committing fornication with the kings of the earth” in following them into fornication against the body which is the opposite of “pure” and “undefiled” and following the Lamb of God out from fornication against the body.