First off, as some had said above, perdition means destruction. There is only one condemned to destruction and that condemnation is found in Ezekiel 28. It's not Judas.II Thessalonians 2:3
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
I can document this easily by going to both Ezekiel 28 and Revelation 17.Revelation 17:8
The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Revelation 17:11
And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Without going into a whole drawn out explanation about what's going on there, the beast is a clear manifestation of Satan (see Revelation 12) and this is the fulfillment of that condemnation delivered in Ezekiel 28. Satan is the son of destruction (perdition) as he is the only one that cannot be saved.Coming to Judas, I caution anyone from going too far to judge the man. There is one Judge and we need to let him do his job as he is the only one righteous enough to do it. That being said, I've made a study on this topic and I see the arguments for both sides minus the perdition argument because I admittedly believe it to be a dangerous assumption to make.The word used when Judas repented means a sort of regret versus someone repenting of their sins. However, he obviously felt bad enough to hang himself and the Greek suggests strongly that he had help as his abdomen was slashed and all of his entrails came out.I guess the point I am trying to make in all of this is don't be surprised to see Judas numbered among the saints. Keep in mind the force at work in all of this and keep in mind the forgiveness of sins that Christ himself died for. Remember too that he cried "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do." on the cross.
I caught a show on Discovery last night saying that Judas didn't really "betray" Jesus but was "picked" by Jesus to "hand him over to" the Romans. It was saying that the word "betrayed" actually means "to hand over to". They were making as if Judas wasn't really a bad guy he was just fullfilling his predetermined destiny. Thoughts?
I suppose you could take the road that God is ultimately in control of what is going to happen here. However, as far as this being some kind of contrived plan, I don't think so. There's nothing to suggest it really, even following the Greek, it means hand over and one can hand over something willingly just as it can be unwillingly. Furthermore, Christ let this happen because it had to happen in order for us all to be forgiven. Be careful in judging Judas and be careful how far you come down on him. I'm not trying to defend his act, but we're not to judge.