Your comment disturbed me (in the best possible way) Manichunter and made me think even more than I usually do. What is occuring to me is that just maybe the word 'church' is not so far from the truth as it indicates a counterfeit, not the real thing.People are forever saying and believing that God is going to come and revive the old wine skins but the scripture makes it clear it is just not going to happen.When God revives he revives people, not the institutions. I have met people affected by the 1904 Welsh revival. They still have a depth of relationship with God but the church that gained the most from it, the Methodists is as dead as a dodo in Wales. In Act 11:26 it says "He found him and brought him back to Antioch. They were there a whole year, meeting with the church and teaching a lot of people. It was in Antioch that the disciples were for the first time called Christians".What it should say is that he met with God's called out ones as it should in all the texts that use the word church. This correct translation takes away all notion of 'church' and clearly deposits the activity into the lives of people, who do not need any formal organisation to contain what was passed on. We know that the Roman church is an apostate church (I say that as one who has been employed by them) but I am beginning to wonder if all formal religious organisations whether they be Roman or protestant are apostate and the true church of called out ones are where two or three are gathered together in the name of Jesus without any formal organisation, leadership or creed.