TribulationSigns
Well-Known Member
- May 1, 2023
- 1,623
- 427
- 83
- 55
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
I never spoke about Daniel 9:26-27. You will not find Daniel's prophesies concerning Antiochus IV in Daniel 9:26-27 because Daniel 9:26-27 is associated with the destruction of both city and temple and with the abominations that are associated with that period.
But the prophecies in Daniel which talk about the cleansing of the temple after an abomination of desolation was placed in the holy place are associated neither with the destruction of the temple or of the city. They are talking about Antiochus IV Epiphanes and THEY are the biblical type of Matthew 24:15 and 2 Thessalonians 2:4.
I won't tell you what the references are in Daniel (though I do know) because I'd prefer you to look for them yourself - because they are talking about the cleansing of the sanctuary following the abomination of desolation paced in the holy place (unlike Daniel 9:26-27).
Ha! I KNOW that there are no such verses that support your nonsense!
Dan 9:27
(27) And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Dan 8:9-14
(9) And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
(10) And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.
(11) Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.
(12) And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered.
(13) Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?
(14) And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.
The continual, or daily was not taken away by Antiochus or Titus or any other man the premillennialist who believe will confirm a covenant with national Israel. No, but by the spirit Satan that Christ allowed after He finished securing all of His Elect. He is in full control and is responsible for loosening Satan for the purpose of ceasing the sacrifice (for salvation). Satan, is the little power that should arise and magnify himself through false prophets and christs in "THE TEMPLE OF GOD" and cast the truth down. What truth was in the physical Jewish Temple in Jerusalem in AD 70? Lest we forget, it was "by reason of transgression an host was given against the daily sacrifice." That is the prophesy. Christ further illuminated it declaring, abomination would stand in the Holy Place. The Jewish Temple was NOT the Holy Place of God in AD 70, nor was it brought to desolation by Antiochus Epiphanes in 168 BC like you think. The fact is, neither Titus nor Antiochus Epiphanes is the little horn that God declares shall cast the truth down (Jerusalem didn't have the truth in AD 70 - Hello?!), take away the continual (daily), which Jerusalem didn't have to be cast down, throw the place of the Prince down (the Jewish temple was not the place of the Prince in AD 70), and tread down the host for 2300 days, cleaning the Sanctuary.
Sorry, SIR, but Antiochus does NOT qualify anymore than Josephus qualifies to interpret God's Word. That is as disjointed a theory that I have read! No, the well-traveled AD 70 theory is all just a pipe dream, a tradition, a very bad private interpretation that disregards all the Biblical facts, substituting speculations for sound exegesis. Period!