I agree
I agree with mind will emotions as a general def. for soul. But being formally educated as a Chiropractor, I also recognize that those attributes are all 'non flesh or non material 'functioning-s' of the brain. I like to say that the soul is the source of our 'motivational' life force. But the spirit is the source of the 'animating' life force for our body.
OK
It could be explained like that.
Definitely the soul is non-material.
Much research today on what CONSCIOUSNESS is.
How do you like this explanation?
The body and soul = a man
Body, soul and spirit = divine life
or the spiritual man
or the divine man - but let's be careful to not understand this as a godman, but just that he has a divine spark in him.
I agree; Paul sees himself as a father to these new believers.
1CO 4:15 For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
And Gal 4:19 "Paul was travailing" to have a spirit child "birth again"..."Christ formed in you" (them). He was doing so, not by birthing their spirits. But by planting the 'seed' of the words of the gospel in them.
But if we have the words of the gospel and accept them...
isn't this planting the seed?
Something that is not the birthing of a baby, but the fetal forming of a new creation. A creation that may not take place for minutes or years. I have planted gospel seeds in those whom others watered. But in the end it still takes a spoken word from the father, such as Peter heard.....that spoken word being; "Jesus IS THE CHRIST, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD". And "faith (to believe that word) comes from hearing the Father, and hearing comes from the spoken rhema/word of God." Romans 10:17
Agreed.
And you're referring to 1 Corinthians 3:15, or thereabouts.
1 Corinthians 3:5-7
5 What then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, even as the Lord gave opportunity to each one.
6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God was causing the growth.
7 So then neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth.
I am a trinitarian too. But with a biblical based twist. I just don't believe "the Word" was God on earth for 33 years when it was the "sinful flesh" body of the triune man Jesus.
But the NT presents Jesus as being God...
and I'm going to say right now that I really don't care to debate this.
In order for Jesus' sacrifice to be valid for all of humanity,
and to be great enough to be the atonement of sins for all of humanity...
Jesus had to be both God and man...but a perfect man.
ROM 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh,
The 'son of God' wasn't 'the Holy Spirit' of the triune God. The "Son" of the triune God was "the spirit of Christ" which was IN Jesus. Scripture says "God IS spirit" Joh 4:24, and in the beginning The Father was spirit, the WORD was spirit, and the Holy Spirit was.....duh, SPIRIT. The spirit WORD gave up equality with the Father and Holy Spirit and became sin natured FLESH ...the body of Jesus.
We have a nuance here that I fear to discuss since I just may not have the language.
Of course Jesus gave up equality with the Father and the Holy Spirit WHILE HE WAS ON EARTH....
Theology teaches that Jesus did this willingly....as He also gave us His life willingly.
I won't post scripture unless you ask me to...I think you know the scripture I'm referring too and it just saves me a lot of time...
I usually do post it, but not sure yet where this is headed.
I DO NOT believe that Jesus had the sin natured flesh,,,which most just refer to as the sin nature.
How could Jesus have the sin nature if He was God?
Can God have sin in Him?
There are verses stating that Jesus was without sin.
I agree, but believe "the spirit of God" is not the Holy Spirit, but the holy spirit of christ which was in Jesus.
Getting a bit confused here.
Are you saying the spirit of §God IS the Holy §Spirit?
This is not really correct.
FATHER
SON
HOLY SPIRIT
The Holy §Spirit is a separate PERSON and is not the spirit of God.
HEB 2:17 Therefore, He (Jesus) had to be made like His brethren in all things,
This verse does not say, what 'the church' teaches; "The brethren have to be made like Jesus in all things."
It's both Hillsage.
Jesus had to be like man.
Man has to become like Jesus.
I can say a lot more biblically, but let's leave this 'discussion' of the trinity. The church fought for over this doctrine for 400 years.
I took a long time for the church to have a creed that explained the Trinity....
but it was believed by the Early Fathers from the very beginning.
It was believe that Jesus was something unique (the only begotten) and trying to explain what or how must
not have been an easy task.
But, yes, let's leave discussion on the Trintiy unless it refers to other convo.
I wasn't familiar with the term "theosis". So I looked it up and now I must say I would agree with that teaching. Thank you for mentioning it.
Some agree....some don't.
There are threads on this.
I don't contribute to them.
John Wesley believed man could achieve complete sanctification (same idea) while alive.d
I just don't believe it's possible, although it should be what a Christian strives for.
And as for you believing we can't "be perfect". I disagree and can't find a single verse that agrees with your opinion that we can't be.
You don't have to agree with me.
But I will ask you this.
Do you know anyone that is perfect?
PHI 3:11 that if possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead. 12 Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own.
Philip 3 speaks of two resurrections in the Greek. One is a resurrection from the dead (ones) and the other is a resurrection OF the dead. To attain the resurrection from the dead (ones) you must reach the perfection Paul was striving for. Paul not making it, doesn't negate its possibility. But you are going to have to have Christ formed in you 100%. And I am now leaning more heavily on that being the biblical definition of "Christian".
Christian has a specific meaning.
We cannot change that definition.
There are some on these threads that define themselves as christian but then go on to prove otherwise.
It seem like YOU're trying to do the same.
Our goal is to have Christ formed in us.
Whether or not that goal is achievable is a different idea.
Are you familiar with early church history?
Some wanted to wait till their dying breath to be baptized...
do you know why? (if you do, it would save me some typing).
Need another verse?
2CO 13:11 Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you.
Be perfect means something different.
If we could be perfect...how do you explain the fact that one could fall away from the faith?
How do you explain all the warnings Paul give to believers?
Even Jesus said to be perfect.
Do you really think Jesus was unaware of man's sinful nature?