Read the Word. Accept the witness of the Word instead of what do you have been taught.I asked you to provide witnesses who say Stephen ascended into heaven and you say you witnesses Stephen ascension,?
How did you see Stephen ascend into heaven,?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Read the Word. Accept the witness of the Word instead of what do you have been taught.I asked you to provide witnesses who say Stephen ascended into heaven and you say you witnesses Stephen ascension,?
How did you see Stephen ascend into heaven,?
Hello! His body died, His spirit went into heaven. I showed you the records of heaven populated before the coming of Christ and you ducked around them.So your saying Abraham Isaac and Jacob never died and are not buried like the Bible says?
Genesis 49:29
Then Jacob instructed them, “Soon I will die and join my ancestors. Bury me with my father and grandfather in the cave in the field of Ephron the Hittite.
Why did Jacob say he would soon die and to bury him?
There is no witness that Stephen ascended into heaven.No.one ever saw it happen.Read the Word. Accept the witness of the Word instead of what do you have been taught.
Hello! His body died, His spirit went into heaven. I showed you the records of heaven populated before the coming of Christ and you ducked around them.
Hello! His body died, His spirit went into heaven. I showed you the records of heaven populated before the coming of Christ and you ducked around them.
Dear Earburner,If you all can think deep enough in the Holy Spirit, aka the mind of Christ, you will discover just exactly what the NEW "earth" is, that Jesus inherited,....along with Eternal Life.
Hmmm....are you thinking??
Where would it be necessary for the "Righteousness of God" to permanently dwell?
In an earth? Or in that which is OF earth?
John 2:18-21
Heb. 10
[5] Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
2 Cor. 4
[7] But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.
Do you dare to believe it?
No. This is complete nonsense. This is Origenism gone crazy.Dear Earburner,
Yes, the spirit word "earth" is a symbol for mankind's carnality and in the verse 2Cor 4:7, an "earthen vessel" represents a body of flesh.
Consider how "earth" and "heaven" are used in the verses below:
Isa 26:9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the EARTH, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.
2Pet 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
2Pet 3:7 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up (fire is the symbol for judgment).
2Pet 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Add this concept to to the meanings of "earth" and "heaven" to help complete your understanding.
1Cor 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
The words "earth" and "heaven" are spiritual terms and they should be applied "within" (spiritually) mankind. Spirit words do not apply out in the world (outwardly and physically). If you apply the spiritual teachings of the New Covenant in this manner, the truth of Christ will begin to make better sense and it will eliminate contradictions with other scripture. I can't stress this enough.
Here is what I see with the spirit words "earth" and "heaven" as the verses above use them:
The Natural (Old) Earth represents mankind's carnal spiritual nature. The New Earth represents the new spiritual nature of the Holy Spirit.
The symbol "earth" is synonymous with the spirit word "heart". The natural heart is wicked and the new heart is one governed by the Holy Spirit.
The Natural (Old) Heaven represents mankind's carnal mind. The New Heaven represents the mind of Christ.
Many times in scripture it does not identify which "earth" is being used in a verse. To understand which one is being used, it requires spiritual discernment.
Look again at Isa 26:9:
Isa 26:9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the (New) EARTH, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.
Only the New Earth (one governed by the Holy Spirit) teaches righteousness to the believer (their mind). As it teaches righteousness to the believer's mind, the mind is being transformed into the mind of Christ.
Rom 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Now look at this verse again:
2Pet 3:7 But the (natural) heavens and the (natural) earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment (Day of the Lord) and perdition of ungodly men (children of the devil/all mankind).
The judgment of Christ (Day of the Lord) is what destroys the carnal spiritual nature (Natural Earth) and the carnal mind (Natural Heavens). After they are destroyed, the believer will only have a New Earth and a New Heaven as shown in Rev 21:1 as it describes the Bride/New Jerusalem/Elect/Heirs/saints/First Fruits.
Does this make sense to you?
Joe
Do you have a soul and spirit?Have you been given the gift of the holy Spirit?
Ecclesiastes 12:7
and the dust returns to the ground it came from, and the spirit returns to God who gave it.
Then there is the resurection when the spirit is put back in.
Ezekiel 37
12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.
13 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,
14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the Lord have spoken it, and performed it, saith the Lord.
Notice God says he will bring them up out of their graves?That's because they are not hanging out in the sky when he brings them up out of their graves.They were not with God when they are in their graves.
I completely agree, but just as Paul went to the Gentiles, Peter went to the Jews.And we know the church consists of both Jew and Gentile believers.
That absolutely is something he would say to Jews but wouldn’t say to Gentiles. In 1 Peter 1:1 he wrote to the diaspora which is always referring to Jews elsewhere in the Bible. Even though many Jews remained scattered and unable to fulfill the old covenant requirements of “the people of God”, they were indeed “the people of God” under the new covenant.The second thing to note about that passage is that Peter says "in time past" they "were not a people, but are now the people of God". That's not something he would say to Jews. The Jews were the people of God before Christ brought Jew and Gentile believers together as one body. Look at the passage from Ephesians 2 above. Paul had previously talked about how the Gentiles were formerly "strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world" (Eph 2:11-12), but "Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God". So, Jew and Gentile believers together were formerly not the people of God because Gentiles were "without God in the world", but now are "fellowcitizens". Formerly not the people of God, but now they are. Clearly, that includes Gentile believers.
Then there is the following passage, also:
Paul is quoting from Hosea. In Hosea 1:9, Hosea’s wife Gomer had a son and God said call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God. This is not spoken to Gentiles, it was spoken to the Jews.26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.
In person. This did not prevent them from writing letters to both Jews and Gentiles. Paul called himself "the apostles to the Gentiles" (Romans 11:13). Does that mean all of his letters were addressed only to Gentiles and not to Jews, also? Of course not! So, this argument you're making here cannot be used to prove the audience of 1st Peter was only Jews.I completely agree, but just as Paul went to the Gentiles, Peter went to the Jews.
You're not making any sense. In Romans 9:24-26 Paul specifically included Gentiles as being among those who were formerly not the people of God, but now are the people of God. This is very obvious. That is indicated in Ephesians 2:11-22 as well where Paul said the Gentiles were formerly aliens and strangers to the covenants of promise and without God in the world, but now "are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God".That absolutely is something he would say to Jews but wouldn’t say to Gentiles. In 1 Peter 1:1 he wrote to the diaspora which is always referring to Jews elsewhere in the Bible. Even though many Jews remained scattered and unable to fulfill the old covenant requirements of “the people of God”, they were indeed “the people of God” under the new covenant.
If Peter was referring to Gentiles then we would have to conclude that Gentiles had no part in the old covenant, they were not a people of God. However both ethnic Jews and Gentiles were part of the old covenant, only those people who didn’t participate in the old covenant requirements were not in the “household of God”. Under the new covenant a person didn’t have to assimilate into the 12 tribes and therefore they could remain physically strangers and foreigners but be spiritually fellow citizens in the same house with all other believers.
Ephesians 2:19 certainly can’t be referring to literal strangers and foreigners because these conditions still physically exist today.
Do you not understand by now that many of the references in the Old Testament that seemed to only refer to the Jews applies to Gentiles as well? Yes, that was a mystery back then, but it's not now! Why is it still a mystery to you? Have you never read this:Paul is quoting from Hosea. In Hosea 1:9, Hosea’s wife Gomer had a son and God said call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God. This is not spoken to Gentiles, it was spoken to the Jews.
Do you have a reference where God says to the Gentiles “you are not my people”? And where was the place that this was said?
We are dealing with complete insanity on this forum. It's almost unbelievable. I think some of these people must be cult members.No. This is complete nonsense. This is Origenism gone crazy.
LOL. Do you think Stephen was mistaken then for believing that Jesus would receive his spirit in heaven? Why do you have such a low opinion of Stephen that he wouldn't understand what happens after physical death? I know he understood that and that's why he said what he did. You are the one denying what Stephen indicated would happen once he physically died, which is foolish.There is no witness that Stephen ascended into heaven.No.one ever saw it happen.
Yes! I agree 100%.Dear Earburner,
Yes, the spirit word "earth" is a symbol for mankind's carnality and in the verse 2Cor 4:7, an "earthen vessel" represents a body of flesh.
Consider how "earth" and "heaven" are used in the verses below:
Isa 26:9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the EARTH, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.
2Pet 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
2Pet 3:7 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up (fire is the symbol for judgment).
2Pet 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Add this concept to to the meanings of "earth" and "heaven" to help complete your understanding.
1Cor 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
The words "earth" and "heaven" are spiritual terms and they should be applied "within" (spiritually) mankind. Spirit words do not apply out in the world (outwardly and physically). If you apply the spiritual teachings of the New Covenant in this manner, the truth of Christ will begin to make better sense and it will eliminate contradictions with other scripture. I can't stress this enough.
Here is what I see with the spirit words "earth" and "heaven" as the verses above use them:
The Natural (Old) Earth represents mankind's carnal spiritual nature. The New Earth represents the new spiritual nature of the Holy Spirit.
The symbol "earth" is synonymous with the spirit word "heart". The natural heart is wicked and the new heart is one governed by the Holy Spirit.
The Natural (Old) Heaven represents mankind's carnal mind. The New Heaven represents the mind of Christ.
Many times in scripture it does not identify which "earth" is being used in a verse. To understand which one is being used, it requires spiritual discernment.
Look again at Isa 26:9:
Isa 26:9 With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the (New) EARTH, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.
Only the New Earth (one governed by the Holy Spirit) teaches righteousness to the believer (their mind). As it teaches righteousness to the believer's mind, the mind is being transformed into the mind of Christ.
Rom 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Now look at this verse again:
2Pet 3:7 But the (natural) heavens and the (natural) earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment (Day of the Lord) and perdition of ungodly men (children of the devil/all mankind).
The judgment of Christ (Day of the Lord) is what destroys the carnal spiritual nature (Natural Earth) and the carnal mind (Natural Heavens). After they are destroyed, the believer will only have a New Earth and a New Heaven as shown in Rev 21:1 as it describes the Bride/New Jerusalem/Elect/Heirs/saints/First Fruits.
Does this make sense to you?
Joe
Once again, you side with catholicism's "truth" and oppose Protestantism, just like a good Jesuit.I could not possibly care less about that. I get truth from scripture, not Tyndale. In your false doctrine, God is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob because He is not the God of the dead, but of the living (Matt 22:32).
Words mean things. It doesn't say "Stephen" went to heaven.LOL. Do you think Stephen was mistaken then for believing that Jesus would receive his spirit in heaven? Why do you have such a low opinion of Stephen that he wouldn't understand what happens after physical death? I know he understood that and that's why he said what he did. You are the one denying what Stephen indicated would happen once he physically died, which is foolish.
It's YOU who doesn't understand what happens when people die! You're own words indicate you don't understand the difference between a "soul" and "spirit" - allow me to educate you:What do you think, that Jesus said "Nah, that's okay. I don't allow people's souls or spirits to go to heaven."? No, I'm sure He received Stephen's spirit just as Stephen asked Him to because Stephen understood what happens when people physically die, unlike you.
The spirit of God in Stephen is simply his last breath and does not belong to him, but to God who gave it, on loan (Act. 17:25; Pro. 22:7).Acts 7:59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
Exactly. They have to go online to promote their extremism because no one around them (in real life) takes them serious.We are dealing with complete insanity on this forum. It's almost unbelievable. I think some of these people must be cult members.
There's so much error here, like the mosquito at the nudist colony, I'm not sure where to begin ;)Hello! How about opening your Bible first?
If we make this passage literal, that introduces many Bible contradictions.Jesus said in Luke 16:19-31
The "comforted" are the church who have the Comforter. The "tormented" are the Jews upon whom "wrath has come upon upon them to the uttermost".The just are clearly “comforted” here. The lost are clearly “tormented” here.
Correct, which proves it's not a literal passage, but a parable: The only two kinds of bodies the Bible knows about are the mortal "earthly house" and the resurrection "building of God".But it talking about the man in hell sending someone to his brothers who were still physically alive and warning them about the flames. This can't be after the coming of Christ.
Ancient texts had zero punctuation. The comma can go before or after "today". Now, the Septuagint has "today" modified by the verb it precedes only 50 times, but by the verb it follows 170 times! So, the majority use of the word suggests the comma should go after "today":Jesus said to the dying thief, in Luke 23:43, "Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
Yes, the Spirit returned to God, the Body to dust, and the soul "Stephen" went to "sleep" aka "passed out of existence" until the resurrection where he'll come back into existence.Stephen’s spirit was separating from his body and went to be with God. However, his body was going to the grave.
In verses 2-4, Paul says Christians groan for relief from life's burdens, but "not for that we would be unclothed". So, the relief they want isn't by becoming "naked" and "unclothed" but "clothed upon".2 Corinthians 5:8
Again, Paul knew "be with Christ" happens not at death, but "at the last trump" and since "the dead lie there accounting neither days nor years, but when they have awaked, they shall have seemed to have slept scarce one minute" (Martin Luther) - then yes, it will seem to anyone who wakes up to be with Christ coming in the clouds that they departed only moments before.having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ
Paul's not saying "we live together with Jesus while we're dead".Christ, who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him.
They're "naked" and "unclothed" without a body RIP in the grave awaiting resurrection, which Paul knew would happen to him despite his desire to be absent from the body, skip that, and be present with Jesus.that they may rest from their labours
Some say they're among "many of the bodies of the saints which slept" while variant readings suggest beings from unfallen worlds, but they're definitely not "disembodied souls" of dead saints.we see 24 Elders around the throne in heaven. Who are they?
These are saints Jesus came and resurrected at the Second Coming.Also, in Revelation 7 we see several references to 144,000 in heaven that have been redeemed from off the earth.
These, again, are the saints that Jesus resurrected at the Second Coming.Revelation 20:4 says, “And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them.”
This symbolic passage in the most symbolic book is symbolic for the divine justice crying out to be done on behalf of martyred saints.Revelation 6:9-10 similarly says, “I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge
Since "judgment must being at the house of God" which is the church, the Pre-Advent Judgment deals first with those who were deemed "heretics" and put to death to determine if they were indeed guilty, and "white robes" is symbolic of these "heretics" being found sincere followers of Jesus.“And white robes were given unto every one of them
Also Pre-Advent.and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.”
Everyone knows Revelation isn't in chronological order because - unlike here in the West - the Hebrew mindset puts a story's climax in the middle, then continues, often with subsequent details rhymed thematically with preceding details in a "chiasmus" or "X" literary device style. So, verse 1 starts the revelation about the plagues, verses 2-4 are the climax, and verse 5 picks up the story and continues with subsequent details.Revelation 15:1-3 says, “I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvellous, seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God. I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast
There is no "intra-Advent". Jesus comes, takes the saints home to New Jerusalem for 1,000 years to judge wicked men and angels and leaves behind a destroyed, desolate Earth, then New Jerusalem comes down as the wicked resurrect to judgment and are found guilty and cast into the LOF, after which Jesus remakes the heaven and Earth.Again, this relates to the intra-Advent period.
This is after the Second Coming/First Resurrection.Revelation 7:9-14
There is no need for a future Temple to be built to fulfill this AOD prophecy, as it has already been fulfilled in 70 a.d. when the Roman army surrounded, and then destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple.
In the thread “Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?” Post #568 you said “You need to read the New Testament. It repeatedly shows how Gentile believers were included in the covenants that God made with Israel.”Should we ignore how Paul said the Gentiles were formerly "without God in the world" but are now part of God's household? If that doesn't describe the Gentiles as formerly not being the people of God, but now being the people of God together with Israelite believers, I don't know what does.
You need to read the New Testament. It repeatedly shows how Gentile believers were included in the covenants that God made with Israel.