man i am shocked again. these xtreme atheists just wont give up.first off, no evidence in this video that shows jesus isn't real. this dude is constructing a wild range of theories based on no evidence at all, and using disputed argments disscusing when then the gospels were written that have been going on for centuries. no one knows exactly when they were written. that's all pure speculation and educated guesses by historians. however, it's very like they were written before 70 A.D. i'll explain later2ndly, i laughed at the start how he was trying to descredit our christians in their faith. yes, not all christians know how the bible was formed, but that doesn't mean in anyway it wasn't formed or that jesus wasn't a real person. he tried to give off the impression using their argument, as it was to count that since that they don't how they bible was formed, they don't know if jesus was a real person or not. that's a weak argument in my opinion. that's just like saying since i don't know who my my great, great, great, great, great grandmother is, then i don't know if she really existed or not. by this, you can really see his true intentions.then he mentions the gospel of mark. now concerning mark's gospel when it was written is a disuputed matter. this guy tries to say because it mentions the descruction of the temple that it must of been written after the year 70 A.D., but that's not what it says in the gospel. jesus was actually prophecizing the descruticon of the 2nd temple, he wasn't saying it was destoryed, he was saying it was going to be destoryed. but yet, the narrator of the video gives off the impression that it was destoryed, then concludes because of that, it must of been written after the year 70 A.D., then he goes on to say that that all other gospels were written after mark, and that there was a 30-40 year gap, and something happend in that gap. did you see what he did? that's side-swipe tactic. forcing the audience to make decisions by stating his opinions are facts. none of the gospels mention the destruction of the temple or jeruselem, this is why it's believed to be written before 70 A.D., which i agree.i'm just wondering if he read the gospel of mark at all. if he did, he surely would seen that jesus was prophecizing of its destruction, not saying it is was destoryed. that barely counts as proofhis words... "so it must of been written later than that, much later than that" LOLhe then uses a movie as a evidence to show paul was only trying to spread the word in vengence. in vengence? lolhe then goes on say that since because paul never saw mary, jesus, bethlehem, before he was a christian, that it's suppose to give creedence that paul most of been a fictional character. that's just like saying since i've never seen the country of france, therefore i can't exists LOL on the contarry, paul never grew up in israel, it's actaually believed he grew up in rome, because he himself said he was roman citizen. he said this when he was being held prisonor & being persucuted by the romans by spreading the word of christ. so it's possible he could of came to israel much later. even if did grew up in israel, that shouldn't descredit his claims at all. there were alot of people in israel that never saw jesus, bethlehem, mary.notice the scripture he uses in hebrews 8:4, he tries to say by this scripture that if jesus lived on earth, he would not have been a priest. what he's actually saying is the scripture is saying jesus was never on earth . that's not what the writer of hebrews was saying. the author of hebrews was saying, if jesus was back on earth, there would be no need for anymore priests, since jesus is the priest of priests. the narrator of this video clearly can't read at all.it's funny how he keeps saying... "once you assemble the facts", when clearly he's using no facts at all. all speculation on disputed arguments.he then uses comments by other proffesors to conclude the main gospels are a fraud. yes, there are other gospels, but they were thrown out on good intentions. these are the gnostic gospels. there were written to contridict the main gospels of matt, mark, luke & john. those gnostic gospels were never considered cannon by our church leaders. this is why they were thrown out.i've stopped at the first video, it's clearly to me this dude is just reaching on speculation and trying to say all his arguments are proof. it's obvious he's reaching in the sky for fairys. this is no proof at all.i'm just wondering if this is the same guy that was the narrator over the zeitigiest movie, which has cearly been debunked by the way. but it sounds like the same guy. he wont give up lol