Excuse me for butting in on a conversation with someone else.
They are simply a memorial to recall teh death and resurrection of jesus.
If one studies the actual Passover seder, one finds Jesus explaining the typology of two elements of the seder. Most of the seder was known as symbolic of something else, but the particular unleavened bread and the particular cup Jesus passed around had never been explained.
Jesus took the middle loaf from a trifolded napkin. It had to be unleavened, striped and pierced. He broke it in half, passed out one half and put the other back to be done later.
Of the four cups at Passover, (fifth if a family also had the cup of Elijah) Jesus took the fourth cup- the cup of redemption
There is no biblical evidence that Jesus took the forth cup in the Upper Room. The Eucharistic Sacrifice and the Crucifixion is one and the same sacrifice. When you see that it's because God revealed it to you. It's a supernatural grace available to anyone who is humble enough to respond to it.
Matt. 26:29; Mark 14:25 – Jesus is celebrating the Passover seder meal with the apostles which requires them to drink four cups of wine. But Jesus only presents the first three cups. He stops at the Third Cup (called “Cup of Blessing” – that is why Paul in 1 Cor. 10:16 uses the phrase “Cup of Blessing” to refer to the Eucharist – he ties the seder meal to the Eucharistic sacrifice). But Jesus conspicuously tells his apostles that He is omitting the Fourth Cup called the “Cup of Consummation.” The Gospel writers point this critical omission of the seder meal out to us to demonstrate that the Eucharistic sacrifice and the sacrifice on the cross are
one and the same sacrifice, and the sacrifice would not be completed until Jesus drank the Fourth Cup on the cross.
Matt. 26:30; Mark 14:26 – they sung the great Hallel, which traditionally followed the Third Cup of the seder meal, but did not drink the Fourth Cup of Consummation. The Passover sacrifice had begun, but was not yet finished. It continued in the Garden of Gethsemane and was consummated on the cross.
4. “Kos Revii” – The Fourth Cup
This cup is drunk after the concluding portion of Hallel is recited. According to Jewish Tradition, this portion is focused on the future, and asks G-d to redeem Israel and humanity-at-large, and usher in the period spoken of by the Prophets, in which “Nishmat kol chai tevarech et shimecha, Hashem” “The soul of every living thing will bless Your Name, O G-d.”
Wait a minute. The Hallel is sung after the Third Cup, the cup that Paul talks about. (1 Cor. 10:16) I don't think any Jew you find would get their cups mixed up.
Blessings are recited before and after the drinking of the Cup, and the Seder is thereby concluded.
Beautiful, isn't it? Who in the Gospels drank the Fourth Cup, and when???
Jesus was showing that teh cup of redemption was His blood poured out for sin. Remember it is to be done in remembrance of HIm and to show forth His death till He returns.
"Remembrance" is has a deeper meaning in Greek or Hebrew than it does in English. Here's proof:
Luke 22:19; 1 Cor. 11:24-25 – the translation of Jesus’ words of consecration is “touto poieite tan eman anamnasin.” Jesus literally said “offer this as my memorial sacrifice.” The word “poiein” (do) refers to offering a sacrifice (see, e.g., Exodus 29:38-39, where God uses the same word – poieseis – regarding the sacrifice of the lambs on the altar). The word “anamnesis” (remembrance) also refers to a sacrifice which is really or actually made present in time by the power of God, as it reminds God of the actual event (see, e.g., Heb. 10:3; Num. 10:10).
It is not just a memorial of a past event, but a past event made present in time.
In other words, the “sacrifice” is the “memorial” or “reminder.” If the Eucharist weren’t a sacrifice, Luke would have used the word “mnemosunon” (which is the word used to describe a nonsacrificial memorial. See, for example, Matt. 26:13; Mark 14:9; and especially Acts 10:4).
So there are two memorials, one sacrificial (which Jesus instituted), and one non-sacrificial.
Lev. 24:7 – the word “memorial” in Hebrew in the sacrificial sense is “
azkarah” which means to actually make present (see Lev. 2:2,9,16;5:12;6:5; Num.5:26 where “azkarah” refers to sacrifices that are currently offered and thus present in time). Jesus’ instruction to offer the bread and wine (which He changed into His body and blood) as a “memorial offering” demonstrates that the offering of His body and blood
is made present in time over and over again.
Num. 10:10 – in this verse, “remembrance” refers to a sacrifice, not just a symbolic memorial. So Jesus’ command to offer the memorial “in remembrance” of Him demonstrates that the memorial offering is indeed a sacrifice currently offered. It is a re-presentation of the actual sacrifice made present in time. It is as if the curtain of history is drawn and Calvary is made present to us.
Mal. 1:10-11 – Jesus’ command to his apostles to offer His memorial sacrifice of bread and wine which becomes His body and blood fulfills the prophecy that God would reject the Jewish sacrifices and receive a pure sacrifice offered in every place. This pure sacrifice of Christ is sacramentally re-presented from the rising of the sun to its setting in every place, as Malachi prophesied.
THE EUCHARIST - Scripture Catholic