Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Anti-christ will commit the abomination of desolation in the soon to be rebuilt Jewish temple.
Is the abomination of desolation fulfilled?
Absolutely yes. This is one of the biggest failures in these eschatology forums, because modern prophecy is littered with dispensationalist futurist interpretations, some of which I agree with, and some of which I strongly disagree with.
Part of what causes this disturbance is the introduction of Preterism into the discussion. Again, I partly agree with it, and strongly disagree with other parts of it.
I do believe Preterism has entered into the discussion because of the abject failure of modern prophecy to treat the historical nature of the Olivet Discourse. Plainly, Jesus meant this Discourse to focus on the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, and on the destruction of the temple in 70 AD.
And yet, modern prophecy enthusiasts, who are futurists, want *everything* to be about future prophecy, when plainly, there are many prophecies that were fulfilled in history!
The Abomination of Desolation is referred to in the book of Daniel, and there are two of them, and not just one of them. One AoD referred to Antiochus 4, and you can read that in Dan 8 and Dan 11, as well as in the last part of Dan 12.
The end of history is dealt with in Dan 7 and in the 1st part of Dan 12.
The historical AoD and its time period is dealt with in Dan 9 and in the 1st part of Dan 12.
Thus, it is my view that the AoD was fulfilled in history, specifically in the reign of Antiochus 4 and in the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD.
The Antichrist is never said to be an AoD! But clearly, the AoDs of history are lookalikes of the Antichrist, and clearly predecessors in a sense, or prototypes, or foreshadowings of the Man of Sin.
- Antichrist will sit in the Temple of God: Third Temple or the Jews soon to be built....
antichrist-will-sit-in-the Jaewish temple and say he is God = the abomination of desolation
4 Anti-christ===Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (2 Thess. 2:3-4) KJV
- Antichrist will sit in the Temple of God: Third Temple or the Jews soon to be built....
antichrist-will-sit-in-the Jaewish temple and say he is God = the abomination of desolation
4 Anti-christ===Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (2 Thess. 2:3-4) KJV
Think!!! No anti-christ will sit in the body of Christ!!!
- Antichrist will sit in the Temple of God: Third Temple or the Jews soon to be built....
antichrist-will-sit-in-the Jaewish temple and say he is God = the abomination of desolation
4 Anti-christ===Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (2 Thess. 2:3-4) KJV
Jesus indicated that Herod's temple would be destroyed. And the Jewish People would not be reconstituted as a spiritual people again until he returned.
38 Look, your house is left to you desolate. 39 For I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
The Church replaced Israel!
Matt 21:43
You're reading way too much into Jesus' statement. 1st, the "Church" is defined as an entity that consists of *all* nations, including the nation of Israel. So there is no possible "replacement" that you suggest.
2nd, there is in fact a *temporary* displacement of the nation Israel for other nations that become Christian nations. Israel has temporarily chosen *not* to become a Christian nation, erasing her placement within the international Church.
But this does not prevent Israel from choosing to become a Christian nation after Christ returns. The Scriptures indicate that God made irrevocable promises to Abraham that his heir, the nation Israel, could have a guaranteed place within the Church. You can find this in the OT Prophets, where Israel is promised a final deliverance from backsliding and from their enemies. And you can also find this in the NT, where Jesus indicated Israel would be saved, as a nation, at his coming.
Acts 1.6 Then they gathered around him and asked him, “Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?”
7 He said to them: “It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.
In this last quote you have *absolute proof* that Jesus understood the OT promise that Israel would be restored. He only said that Christians are not given the exact time when it will take place.
no like all others they must convert
the one true church is eternal
Luk 1:32 - He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
Luk 1:33 - And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
21:43 - Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. (The new covenant church)
Zechariah 13:6
And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds in thine hands? Then he shall answer, Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.
Matt 23:17 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Matt 23:38 - Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
Matt 23:39 - For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
You just quoted, in Matt 23.39, proof that Jesus believed Israel would be restored to the Church! So how can you say no? You argue against what Jesus said! Undoubtedly, Israel has backslidden as a nation. But Paul argued that at present, a Christian remnant maintains the hope that the nation as a whole will be reconstituted as a Christian nation. The very existence of a Christian remnant *proves* that Jews can convert to Christ.
When I say the whole nation will be converted I don't at all mean that *every Jew* will be converted. The process of Israel's full national conversion simply refers to the entire "politic" of the nation being transformed form non-Christian to Christian--not that every citizen of the State will be born again.
What it means is that before the nation fully converts to a Christian government, many Jews will have to be judged and removed, so that the vast majority will convert, without opposition, to Christianity. Then the nation can indeed form a Christian government, just as many nations in history have formed Christian governments.
The salvation of *all Israel* has never meant that all Jews will convert--only that the entire government of Israel will convert to Christianity. If you deny this, then you will have to either deny that there have *ever* been Christian nations, or you will have to somehow explain why God has allowed many nations to convert to Christianity while denying Jews the same in their own nation?
Instead of just arguing that Jews have traditionally rejected Christianity as a people, why don't you deal with the *hope of Israel,* which is that things can change, when God disciplines a nation over time, and ultimately brings final judgment down upon that nation?
God has withheld final judgment so as to allow the process of evangelism to continue. But when nations become hardened in their rebellion, it becomes time to bring judgment, so that the nations can be reconstituted having had the recalcitrant members of those nations removed.
so how many Jews have done so?
They must convert on an individual basis to Christ and His church like everyone else
I do believe Preterism has entered into the discussion because of the abject failure of modern prophecy to treat the historical nature of the Olivet Discourse. Plainly, Jesus meant this Discourse to focus on the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, and on the destruction of the temple in 70 AD.
Yes! Just before the Army of Rome came in the temple was being run over by the children of the devil or these fake Jews. These children desegregated everything that was holy and they set it on fire.Is the abomination of desolation fulfilled?
Matthew 24:15 "When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place (whoso readeth, let him understand:)"
The "abomination" is when Satan stands in Jerusalem, and proclaims that he is God, and the world believes it. The "desolation" is an incorrect translation into the English, which should read "desolator", and Satan is the desolator that will make the claim that he is God, the true Christ. "Desolation" is a condition, in the Hebrew manuscripts it is written, "On the wings of the desolator," this is not a condition, but a entity, a person. It is through this individual, Satan that the abomination shall come from. It is the desolator [Satan] that shall cause all but the sealed of God, to become desolate, or deceived.
Daniel 9:27 "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and the determined shall be poured upon the desolate."
The Holy place is the place that the temple sits, and this is the subject for the very first, when the buildings of the temple were observed by the disciples, and the question of what it would be like at His second advent. This is where the desolation [Satan, the Antichrist] shall sit on mount Zion, making his abominations, or statements that he is the Christ.