You teach the standard (Historicism) found in reformed eschatology
We will strongly disagree
You cant have the AOD in 70AD, and a run through the park tribulation over 2,000 years, with the words "Immediately After" conforming to this eschatology in a prolonged tribulation, no sale on this one
Of course you can, and you give no reason whatsoever why I can't see it that way. You just assert that I can't. Why? What you really seem to be saying is that you can't "fathom it" because you've heard it one way so long in your own personal group that it seems beyond your comprehension. It just can't be because it just "can't be!"
It's the same thing with the Pretrib Rapture. One cannot actually grow up with and spend so much time with Pretribbers without it seeming anathema to say anything else. It's as if the entire history of the church is corrupt because in your own narrow experience you think what has been going on for the last 200 years is all that should ever count in Church history. Are we heretics because we don't believe in the Pretrib Rapture?
The dead give away is the future generation that will see the AOD will also see the Great Tribulation and Second Coming, your eschatology stops dead in its tracks on this fact alone, as the scripture clearly states below
As I said, a future generation will see Christ's Coming, but this is *never* said to be the same generation as the one that sees the AoD!
No need to beat the dead horse, Im well aquainted with (Historicism) in the (Partial Preterist) teaching, we will disagree
The trouble is, brother, I'm not a Partial Preterist. But as to the notion of historical interpretations, would you say that no Bible Prophecies have been fulfilled in Jesus' 1st Coming? You must admit that Jesus fulfilled Bible Prophecy when he was born of a virgin, died for sin, and rose from the dead. If so, you believe in historically-fulfilled Bible Prophecies!
Are you then a Partial Preterist? No? Well, neither am I brother, and I'd appreciate you not slandering me by claiming I am.
I hold to a position that is oftten associated with PP. But I'm a Futurist that simply shares with PP the belief that much--not all--of the Olivet Discourse was fulfilled in 66-70 AD. The Church Fathers were *not* PPs, and yet believed that the AoD was the Roman Army, or something close to that in the 1st Century. I would agree with them. And Dan 9.26-27 suggests that, as well. Please give it another thought.
I do wish to emphasize that I don't believe the AoD exhausted the prophecy of the Great Tribulation of the Jewish People, prophesied in the Olivet Discourse. Jesus indicated the AoD was just the beginning of that period. In other words, the coming of the Romans 66-70 AD only began the period of Great Distress to happen to the Jewish People. The Great Tribulation of the Jewish People is to last until the end of the age, when Jesus comes back to salvage Israel from Judaism.