The Popular False Justification and False Sanctification View Today.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
@savedbygrace1

I would encourage you to stop listening to Protestants for one year and just read your Bible alone and ask God for the understanding on it. Forget everything you know and just read and believe your Bible at face value. Don’t let a man tell you what the Bible even says (Not even me). Just read it and believe the Bible at face value. Well, if you are a truth seeker, I believe you would be able to do this. But only time will tell in the end (of course). Choose wisely your path. Follow men of the Protestant religion or follow Jesus and His Word alone with the help of God.
Why are you afraid to answer such a simple question? Why keep running away from answering?
The law handed down at Sanai comprised of the legalistic and moral law/ie the ten commandments. In your view, could the legalistic part of the law be fautlessly obeyed. If you dont know the answer, just say ''I dont know''
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
It should be obvious the legalistic part of the law handed down at Sanai could be faultlessly obeyed. Paul claimed Saul the Pharisee could faultlessly obey it:

As for legalistic righteousness, faultless Phil3:6 niv 1984 edition. Yet we know Saul could not obey the ten commandments(rom ch7) The Pharisees of Jesus day could faultlessly obey the legalistic law of rite, ritual and ceremony, and they did not even know God Jesus tells us. They cleaned the outside of the cup. But on the inside they were full of wickedness, hypocrisy and everything unclean/they broke the moral law.

Therefore, if there was no moral law handed down at Sanai, but only the legalistic law, you could indeed be righteous/justified in God’s sight by obeying the law. For if you can faultlessly obey a law, you can be justified by obeying it obviously. Therefore the reason Paul relentlessly stated you are not/cannot be justified/righteous by obeying the law MUST have been because of the moral side of the law. The law came as one whole law, but because of the moral part of the law, you could not be justified/righteous in God's sight by obeying it. Bible highlighter has stated it is ‘’BALONEY’’ to believe when Paul repeatedly stated you cannot be righteous/justified by obeying the law, he had primarily in his mind the moral law/mainly ten commandments when he repeatedly stated that. Such a statement sadly shows a lack of understanding/discerning the subject of justification/righteousness. You can quote the letter of scripture all day long, without understanding the message the letter contains. The pharisees of Jesus day being a perfect example of this
 
Last edited:

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why are you afraid to answer such a simple question? Why keep running away from answering?
The law handed down at Sanai comprised of the legalistic and moral law/ie the ten commandments. In your view, could the legalistic part of the law be fautlessly obeyed. If you dont know the answer, just say ''I dont know''

I answered it with a passage. Do you not believe the Bible in what it says?
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
I answered it with a passage. Do you not believe the Bible in what it says?
It should be obvious the legalistic part of the law handed down at Sanai could be faultlessly obeyed. Paul claimed Saul the Pharisee could faultlessly obey it:

As for legalistic righteousness, faultless Phil3:6 niv 1984 edition. Yet we know Saul could not obey the ten commandments(rom ch7) The Pharisees of Jesus day could faultlessly obey the legalistic law of rite, ritual and ceremony, and they did not even know God Jesus tells us. They cleaned the outside of the cup. But on the inside they were full of wickedness, hypocrisy and everything unclean/they broke the moral law.

Therefore, if there was no moral law handed down at Sanai, but only the legalistic law, you could indeed be righteous/justified in God’s sight by obeying the law. For if you can faultlessly obey a law, you can be justified by obeying it obviously. Therefore the reason Paul relentlessly stated you are not/cannot be justified/righteous by obeying the law MUST have been because of the moral side of the law. The law came as one whole law, but because of the moral part of the law, you could not be justified/righteous in God's sight by obeying it. Bible highlighter has stated it is ‘’BALONEY’’ to believe when Paul repeatedly stated you cannot be righteous/justified by obeying the law, he had primarily in his mind the moral law/mainly ten commandments when he repeatedly stated that. Such a statement sadly shows a lack of understanding/discerning the subject of justification/righteousness. You can quote the letter of scripture all day long, without understanding the message the letter contains. The pharisees of Jesus day being a perfect example of this
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It should be obvious the legalistic part of the law handed down at Sanai could be faultlessly obeyed. Paul claimed Saul the Pharisee could faultlessly obey it:

As for legalistic righteousness, faultless Phil3:6 niv 1984 edition. Yet we know Saul could not obey the ten commandments(rom ch7) The Pharisees of Jesus day could faultlessly obey the legalistic law of rite, ritual and ceremony, and they did not even know God Jesus tells us. They cleaned the outside of the cup. But on the inside they were full of wickedness, hypocrisy and everything unclean/they broke the moral law.

Therefore, if there was no moral law handed down at Sanai, but only the legalistic law, you could indeed be righteous/justified in God’s sight by obeying the law. For if you can faultlessly obey a law, you can be justified by obeying it obviously. Therefore the reason Paul relentlessly stated you are not/cannot be justified/righteous by obeying the law MUST have been because of the moral side of the law. The law came as one whole law, but because of the moral part of the law, you could not be justified/righteous in God's sight by obeying it. Bible highlighter has stated it is ‘’BALONEY’’ to believe when Paul repeatedly stated you cannot be righteous/justified by obeying the law, he had primarily in his mind the moral law/mainly ten commandments when he repeatedly stated that. Such a statement sadly shows a lack of understanding/discerning the subject of justification/righteousness. You can quote the letter of scripture all day long, without understanding the message the letter contains. The pharisees of Jesus day being a perfect example of this

You like to put words in my mouth.

Anyways, as for Philippians 3:6: Touching the Law means Paul was loosely keeping it. It does not say he was blameless in keeping the whole law. Paul basically stated in Romans 7:14-24 that he could not keep the Law (Note: He said this from his experience as a Pharisee before he met Christ). So I agree that Paul did not keep the Law as a Pharisee. Also, the Pharisees did not obey God’s laws. Matthew 23:23, and Luke 11:42 makes it clear by our Lord Jesus’ words Himself say that they ignored the weightier matters of the Law like love, faith, justice, and mercy. Even their traditions had violated the Laws of God (See: Matthew 15:3, Mark 7:9).

Zacharias, and Elisabeth walked in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Luke 1:5-6
“…Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.”

Hebrews 7:19 is true in that the Law made nothing perfect. The Law alone cannot be obeyed without God in a person’s life.
A person also needs to first have faith in God before they can also obey God’s laws, as well. A person also needs to love God and love others before they can obey. For if one gives their whole body to be burned and they have not love, it profits them nothing. Everything hinges on love because God is love. Sin is not of love. Breaking God’s commands is not of love. Jesus said, if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15).
1 John 3:23 is a command to believe in the Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another. This is a NEW COVENANT command and not an Old Covenant command. So what do you do with this? Ignore it? Twist it? 1 John 3:23 has nothing to do with the Old Law. Yet, it’s a command.
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
You like to put words in my mouth.

Anyways, as for Philippians 3:6: Touching the Law means Paul was loosely keeping it. It does not say he was blameless in keeping the whole law. Paul stated in Romans 7:14-24 that he could not keep the Law (Note: He said this from his experience as a Pharisee before he met Christ). So I agree that Paul did not keep the Law as a Pharisee. Also, the Pharisees did not obey God’s laws. Matthew 23:23, and Luke 11:42 makes it clear by our Lord Jesus’ words Himself say that they ignored the weightier matters of the Law like love, faith, justice, and mercy. Even their traditions had violated the Laws of God (See: Matthew 15:3, Mark 7:9).

Zacharias, and Elisabeth walked in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Luke 1:5-6
“…Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.”

Hebrews 7:19 is true in that the Law made nothing perfect. The Law alone cannot be obeyed without God in a person’s life.
A person also needs to first have faith in God before they can also obey God’s laws, as well. A person also needs to love God and love others before they can obey. For if one gives their whole body to be burned and they have not love, it profits them nothing. Everything hinges on love because God is love. Sin is not of love. Breaking God’s commands is not of love. Jesus said, if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15).
1 John 3:23 is a command to believe in the Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another. This is a NEW COVENANT command and not an Old Covenant command. So what do you do with this? Ignore it? Twist it? 1 John 3:23 has nothing to do with the Old Law.
Blameless in regard to the law was in regard to the legalistic law. If Elizabeth and Zechariah could blamelessly obey the entire law it would have been possible for man to be justified by obeying the law and then there would have been no need for Jesus to die at calvary:
as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless. phil3:6

Have another translation if you like. Faultless, if you are faultless in obeying something you faultlessly obey it, not loosely obey it. I'm not putting words in your mouth, don't bear false witness, I just repeated what you stated
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The question remains is… why did Paul, and the Pharisees not able to keep the Old Law?
Because they did not have Christ or God living in them to help them to obey God’s laws.
You need God in your life in order to obey all of His commands.
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach. 12 It is not up in heaven, so that you have to ask, “Who will ascend into heaven to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 13 Nor is it beyond the sea, so that you have to ask, “Who will cross the sea to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 14 No, the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it.

15 See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. 16 For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him, and to keep his commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess.

Deuteronomy 30:11-16

He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness 2Cor3:6-9

Moses stated obeying the law handed down would not be too difficult for the people or beyond their reach. Yet Paul stated, referring to the law engraved in stone it was the letter that killed, the ministry of death and condemnation. Why the difference? Moses was referring to what we might say is the Spirit of the law. The peoples lives could generally reflect obedience to how God wanted them to live, but though that is true, they never would perfectly obey in their humanity, hence the animal sacrifices for sin were included with the law. That was not beyond peoples reach

Paul on the other hand is referring to obeying the letter of the law. ‘’thou shalt not’’ no wiggle room for error. Perfect obedience of the ten commandments or stand guilty before them. In that sense the letter killlls, for no one can or will perfectly obey the letter of the law
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Blameless in regard to the law was in regard to the legalistic law. If Elizabeth and Zechariah could blamelessly obey the entire law it would have been possible for man to be justified by obeying the law and then there would have been no need for Jesus to die at calvary:
as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless. phil3:6

Have another translation if you like. Blameless, if you are blameless of obeying something you faultlessly obey it, not loosely obey it. I'm not putting words in your mouth, don't bear false witness, I just repeated what you stated

Look. I believe the Bible teaches two aspects of salvation.

#1. We are saved first by God’s grace without works through faith by Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9).
#2. We then enter the Sanctification Process of the Spirit of God to live a holy life as a part of God’s continued plan of salvation (2 Thessalonians 2:13) (Romans 8:13).​

This means (if your mind can comprehend it) that I believe that a person cannot save themselves based on Works ALONE. A person’s good deeds cannot outweighs their bad deeds. A person needs to have their past slate of sin wiped out first. No good works or law keeping can wipe out a person’s past sins. A person needs God’s grace to have the slate wiped clean and to start a new. But after a believer is saved by God’s grace, then need to answer the call of the gospel (2 Thessalonians 2:14) in that God has chosen them to salvation through Sanctification of the Spirit and a belief of the truth (2 Thessalonians 2:13). They need to put to death the misdeeds of the body by the Spirit in order to live (Romans 8:13). If not, they are not going to make it. That is why Jesus said narrow is the way and few be there that find it (Matthew 7:14).

Zacharias, and Elisabeth were able to keep the Law blameless at a certain point in their life. That does not mean they obeyed the Law perfectly their whole lives. They obviously sinned at some point in their past life. All have sinned and come short of the glory of God. But when a person meets God for real, and they truly are broken with a godly sorrow over their sin and seek forgiveness with Jesus, (and they believe the gospel message in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4), whereby they desire to no longer sin for real, then God can help them to overcome that sin in the Sanctification Process in this life. For they that are Christ’s have crucified the affections and lusts (Galatians 5:24) (Also see: 1 Peter 4:1-2, 2 Corinthians 7:1).
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach. 12 It is not up in heaven, so that you have to ask, “Who will ascend into heaven to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 13 Nor is it beyond the sea, so that you have to ask, “Who will cross the sea to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 14 No, the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it.

15 See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. 16 For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him, and to keep his commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess.

Deuteronomy 30:11-16

He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness 2Cor3:6-9

Moses stated obeying the law handed down would not be too difficult for the people or beyond their reach. Yet Paul stated, referring to the law engraved in stone it was the letter that killed, the ministry of death and condemnation. Why the difference? Moses was referring to what we might say is the Spirit of the law. The peoples lives could generally reflect obedience to how God wanted them to live, but though that is true, they never would perfectly obey in their humanity, hence the animal sacrifices for sin were included with the law. That was not beyond peoples reach

Paul on the other hand is referring to obeying the letter of the law. ‘’thou shalt not’’ no wiggle room for error. Perfect obedience of the ten commandments or stand guilty before them. In that sense the letter killlls, for no one can or will perfectly obey the letter of the law

This is more Protestant candy land fantasy mumbo jumbo.

Protestants today misinterpret 2 Corinthians 3:6.

It says,

“Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.” (2 Corinthians 3:6).

Now, this verse is not saying that we are to interpret Scripture in a literal way over some overly spiritualistic interpretation (i.e. read the Bible as metaphor when it does not align with what you like to hear). The letter that kills is in reference to the Torah or the Old Testament Law of Moses (the 613 Laws of Moses given to Israel). The context is referring to the two different ways each of these covenants began and it's not talking about the letter in general like the literal commands of Jesus or His followers.

The Old Covenant Law of Moses BEGAN with the letter with the two tablets of stone, and the written Torah.

The New Covenant BEGAN with the audible words of Jesus Christ, and His apostles, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and not by the letter like with the Law of Moses. That is the point Paul was making. We are now under a New Covenant (Which means we are to serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter - Romans 7:6). The oldness of the letter is the Torah or the Old Testament Law of Moses. We are not to serve by looking to the Law of Moses. Yes, all believers (who are truly faithful) are guided by the Holy Spirit, but the Spirit is not going to guide us into any wrongdoing, but the Spirit is going to guide us to obey what the New Testament says. The Spirit is not going to guide us into obeying the whole of the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses as a whole or package deal is no more.

The context of 2 Corinthians 3:6 shows the differences of the two covenants.

2 Corinthians 3:3, 2 Corinthians 3:7, 2 Corinthians 3:12-17 says,

[3] “Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart. [7] But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: [12] Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: [13] And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: [14] But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. [15] But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. [16] Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away. [17] Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”

The context is not saying for us to look at Scripture in a non-literal way and if you do it will bring death. The point Paul was making is that the Old Law is no more. For in the Old Law it did bring death because if somebody disobeyed God's commands in the Old Testament, you could be stoned and or killed physically by God's people (the Israelites). This does not mean we can turn God's grace into a license for immorality by saying that Jesus paid for all future sin or by just believing in Jesus alone for salvation. This is not to oversimplify God's commands in loving God and others in a way that we want when God has given us more than just the two greatest commands. In fact, obeying the 400 approximate commands in the New Testament is a partial fulfillment of the 1st greatest commandment. For to love God with all your heart is to keep His commandments. For Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15). Just painting a broad brush stroke of loving God and your neighbor without truly seeking to obey all of what God says in His Word is to simply follow our own way of thinking vs. simply following what God's Word says.
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
This is more Protestant candy land fantasy mumbo jumbo.

Protestants today misinterpret 2 Corinthians 3:6.

It says,

“Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.” (2 Corinthians 3:6).

Now, this verse is not saying that we are to interpret Scripture in a literal way over some overly spiritualistic interpretation (i.e. read the Bible as metaphor when it does not align with what you like to hear). The letter that kills is in reference to the Torah or the Old Testament Law of Moses (the 613 Laws of Moses given to Israel). The context is referring to the two different ways each of these covenants began and it's not talking about the letter in general like the literal commands of Jesus or His followers.

The Old Covenant Law of Moses BEGAN with the letter with the two tablets of stone, and the written Torah.

The New Covenant BEGAN with the audible words of Jesus Christ, and His apostles, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and not by the letter like with the Law of Moses. That is the point Paul was making. We are now under a New Covenant (Which means we are to serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter - Romans 7:6). The oldness of the letter is the Torah or the Old Testament Law of Moses. We are not to serve by looking to the Law of Moses. Yes, all believers (who are truly faithful) are guided by the Holy Spirit, but the Spirit is not going to guide us into any wrongdoing, but the Spirit is going to guide us to obey what the New Testament says. The Spirit is not going to guide us into obeying the whole of the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses as a whole or package deal is no more.

The context of 2 Corinthians 3:6 shows the differences of the two covenants.

2 Corinthians 3:3, 2 Corinthians 3:7, 2 Corinthians 3:12-17 says,

[3] “Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart. [7] But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: [12] Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: [13] And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: [14] But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. [15] But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. [16] Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away. [17] Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”

The context is not saying for us to look at Scripture in a non-literal way and if you do it will bring death. The point Paul was making is that the Old Law is no more. For in the Old Law it did bring death because if somebody disobeyed God's commands in the Old Testament, you could be stoned and or killed physically by God's people (the Israelites). This does not mean we can turn God's grace into a license for immorality by saying that Jesus paid for all future sin or by just believing in Jesus alone for salvation. This is not to oversimplify God's commands in loving God and others in a way that we want when God has given us more than just the two greatest commands. In fact, obeying the 400 approximate commands in the New Testament is a partial fulfillment of the 1st greatest commandment. For to love God with all your heart is to keep His commandments. For Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15). Just painting a broad brush stroke of loving God and your neighbor without truly seeking to obey all of what God says in His Word is to simply follow our own way of thinking vs. simply following what God's Word says.
You dont understand the subject of righteousness/justification and I have pointed out to you why you do not already. The legalistic law could be faultlessly obeyed the moral law could not be. Im afraid you just preach a message that bears no reflection to your own life. How many of Jesus commands in the gospels do you even try and obey?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Be most wary of people who just woodenly recite the letter of scriptural commands to you, and insist on nigh on perfect obedience to inherit eternal life. For they do not practice what they preach
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You dont understand the subject of righteousness/justification and I have pointed out to you why you do not already. The legalistic law could be faultlessly obeyed the moral law could not be. Im afraid you just preach a message that bears no reflection to your own life. How many of Jesus commands in the gospels do you even try and obey?

You make a faulty argument. The Old Law has nothing to do with the New Covenant laws or commands. We are not under the Old Law (Romans 6:14). Acts of the Apostles 13:39 says we cannot be justified by the Laws of Moses. This is the Old Law. Romans 8:2 says that the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. This Law is Romans 8:1 in that there is no Condemnation to those in Christ Jesus who walk not after the flesh (sin), but after the Spirit. For if you walk after the Spirit you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh (Galatians 5:16). The works of the flesh that are manifested are various sins listed by the apostle Paul in Galatians 5:19-21.

Again, if you say we don’t have to keep the Laws of Christ, or no laws of God whatsoever to be right with God, then you would be speaking contrary to the words of Jesus Christ. Paul said if any man does not agree with the words of Jesus Christ and the doctrine according to godliness, he is proud and he knows nothing (1 Timothy 6:3-4). James 4:6 says God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Your belief speaks contrary to the doctrine according to godliness and thus… it makes one proud. James 4:6 says God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Let this truth sink in for you.
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Be most wary of people who just woodenly recite the letter of scriptural commands to you, and insist on nigh on perfect obedience to inherit eternal life. For they do not practice what they preach

But this is yet another Protestant lie. That’s not what 2 Corinthians 3:6 is even saying. Protestants make up all kinds of stupid sayings that are not really found in the Bible. For example: They say just believe in the finished work of the cross for salvation. That’s dumb. It’s not even in the Bible. No verse even says this nor teaches such a thing.
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
You make a faulty argument. The Old Law has nothing to do with the New Covenant laws or commands. We are not under the Old Law (Romans 6:14). Acts of the Apostles 13:39 says we cannot be justified by the Laws of Moses. This is the Old Law. Romans 8:2 says that the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. This Law is Romans 8:1 in that there is no Condemnation to those in Christ Jesus who walk not after the flesh (sin), but after the Spirit. For if you walk after the Spirit you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh (Galatians 5:16). The works of the flesh that are manifested are various sins listed by the apostle Paul in Galatians 5:19-21.

Again, if you say we don’t have to keep the Laws of Christ, or no laws of God whatsoever to be right with God, then you would be speaking contrary to the words of Jesus Christ. Paul said if any man does not agree with the words of Jesus Christ and the doctrine according to godliness, he is proud and he knows nothing (1 Timothy 6:3-4). James 4:6 says God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Your belief speaks contrary to the doctrine according to godliness and thus… it makes one proud. James 4:6 says God resists the proud and gives grace to the humble. Let this truth sink in for you.
Im not interested in your long posts with faulty reasoning. You have stated to believe Paul had in mind the moral law/mainly ten commandments when he kept repeating you could not be justified/righteous by obeying the law is ‘’BALONEY’’. I’m afraid your comment was baloney. I am happy to repeat, the legalistic law could be faultlessly obeyed
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You dont understand the subject of righteousness/justification and I have pointed out to you why you do not already. The legalistic law could be faultlessly obeyed the moral law could not be. Im afraid you just preach a message that bears no reflection to your own life. How many of Jesus commands in the gospels do you even try and obey?

There is NO such thing as Protestant Justification or Protestant Sanctification. They are simply lies and made up mumbo jumbo. Nowhere does the Bible teach future sin is forgiven you (Which is taught in Protestant Justification). In fact, there is no process called Justification in the Bible. It’s called being saved by God’s grace through faith. The word “justified” is also used for both faith and works in James 2:24. So they are not properly labeling Justification. They are lying. Sanctification also relates to our salvation in entering eternal life (See 2 Thessalonians 2:13, and Romans 8:13).
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.
7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness 2Cor3:6-9

Im only quoting what Paul plainly stated, nothing more
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
There is NO such thing as Protestant Justification or Protestant Sanctification. They are simply lies and made up mumbo jumbo. Nowhere does the Bible teach future sin is forgiven you (Which is taught in Protestant Justification). In fact, there is no process called Justification in the Bible. It’s called being saved by God’s grace through faith. The word “justified” is also used for both faith and works in James 2:24. So they are not properly labeling Justification. They are lying. Sanctification also relates to our salvation in entering eternal life (See 2 Thessalonians 2:13, and Romans 8:13).
You dont understand this subject, because you can only recite the literal letter, you do not understand the message the letter contains
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
990
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Im not interested in your long posts with faulty reasoning. You have stated to believe Paul had in mind the moral law/mainly ten commandments when he kept repeating you could not be justified/righteous by obeying the law is ‘’BALONEY’’. I’m afraid your comment was baloney. I am happy to repeat, the legalistic law could be faultlessly obeyed

Many of the Protestant sayings are BALONEY. No. Actually it is worse than baloney. Baloney is actually edible in a sandwich and it is tasty with mayo and mustard. Protestantism is so bad it’s like eating dog poop. The things Protestants say are not even in the Bible. Most of Protestantism justifies sin under God’s grace. But Titus 2:11-12 says, God’s grace teaches us to deny ungodliness and that we should live righteously and godly in this present world.
 

savedbygrace1

Active Member
Jun 1, 2022
380
51
28
64
Auckland
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Many of the Protestant sayings are BALONEY. No. Actually it is worse than baloney. Baloney is actually edible in a sandwich and it is tasty with mayo and mustard. Protestantism is so bad it’s like eating dog poop. The things Protestants say are not even in the Bible. Most of Protestantism justifies sin under God’s grace. But Titus 2:11-12 says, God’s grace teaches us to deny ungodliness and that we should live righteously and godly in this present world.
Baloney is stating Paul did not have in mind the moral law when he repeatedly stated you could not be justified/righteous by obeying the law