For Those Who Deny Jesus Christ IS Almighty God

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
From Christ's own mouth and they say what they say and mean what they mean.

Along with...My Father is greater than I.
That is old and outdated as an argument...

easily answered in that we can say that Jesus is less than the Father as concerning His humanity but not in His Deity...

That in His Deity He makes Himself equal to the Father (John 5:18).

It has to do with the doctrine of " the hypostatic union".
 

True Faith

Active Member
Jul 21, 2022
776
40
28
50
Morristown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That is old and outdated as an argument...

easily answered in that we can say that Jesus is less than the Father as concerning His humanity but not in His Deity...

That in His Deity He makes Himself equal to the Father (John 5:18).

It has to do with the doctrine of " the hypostatic union".

Yet you say that Jesus is God Himself... and Deity is not divinity by the way... deity simply means God or a God.... you claim that Jesus is God Himself...

Come one now... learn your own doctrine....
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
11,249
5,326
113
66
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That is old and outdated as an argument...

LOL Does it come with an expiration date?

easily answered in that we can say that Jesus is less than the Father as concerning His humanity but not in His Deity...

Find that scripture.....

That in His Deity He makes Himself equal to the Father (John 5:18).

Reading comprehension is your problem....This verse is about the Jews getting angry because they felt that what He meant was that He was equal.....that was not Him saying he was equal.....that was their interpretation of what He said.

hypostatic union

Find the phrase hypostatic union in the Bible. It is another way for those losing a debate to pull a term that means....it does not mean what it means, it means what I want it to mean. It is a honest term but usually over the head of most laymen.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,369
4,995
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
easily answered in that we can say that Jesus is less than the Father as concerning His humanity but not in His Deity
Dualism. Less in any way is not equal. God does not have a human component. Jesus is explicitly said in Scripture to be a man.
 
Last edited:

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yet you say that Jesus is God Himself... and Deity is not divinity by the way... deity simply means God or a God.... you claim that Jesus is God Himself...

Come one now... learn your own doctrine....

Yes, Jesus is God in the flesh.

LOL Does it come with an expiration date?

It is outdated because it has been refuted time and time again the same way every time.

Find that scripture.....

John 5:18

Reading comprehension is your problem....This verse is about the Jews getting angry because they felt that what He meant was that He was equal.....that was not Him saying he was equal.....that was their interpretation of what He said.

No, I do not have a reading comprehension problem. That Jesus made Himself equal with God by calling God His own Father is the estimation of the author of the gospel of John under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

Find the phrase hypostatic union in the Bible. It is another way for those losing a debate to pull a term that means....it does not mean what it means, it means what I want it to mean. It is a honest term but usually over the head of most laymen.

No, we did not come up with that term because we were losing a debate. The hypostatic union simply means that the Deity of Christ is unified with His humanity in the Person of Jesus Christ.

The scriptures are clear that Jesus is God (John 8:58, Exodus 3:14; Hebrews 1:8-9) and that He is also a Man (Romans 1:3).

Thus, the doctrine of the hypostatic union.

We simply invented terminology in order to denote a specific doctrine (which is sound doctrine) in holy scripture.

Dualism. Less in any way is not equal. God does not have a human component. Jesus is explicitly said in Scripture to be a man.

Yes, Jesus is a Man and He is also God. Thus, the doctrine of the hypostatic union.

Certainly not "dualism".
 

True Faith

Active Member
Jul 21, 2022
776
40
28
50
Morristown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes, Jesus is God in the flesh.



It is outdated because it has been refuted time and time again the same way every time.



John 5:18



No, I do not have a reading comprehension problem. That Jesus made Himself equal with God by calling God His own Father is the estimation of the author of the gospel of John under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.



No, we did not come up with that term because we were losing a debate. The hypostatic union simply means that the Deity of Christ is unified with His humanity in the Person of Jesus Christ.

The scriptures are clear that Jesus is God (John 8:58, Exodus 3:14; Hebrews 1:8-9) and that He is also a Man (Romans 1:3).

Thus, the doctrine of the hypostatic union.

We simply invented terminology in order to denote a specific doctrine (which is sound doctrine) in holy scripture.



Yes, Jesus is a Man and He is also God. Thus, the doctrine of the hypostatic union.

Certainly not "dualism".

There is no truth in you because you deny both Jesus and God Himself....
"Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is no truth in you because you deny both Jesus and God Himself....
"Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."
This of course is a lie from the pit of hell.

I know that the truth dwells within me because I am a child of God. His Spirit bears witness with my spirit that it is so (Romans 8:16).

I confess that Jesus is the Christ!
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Isaiah 9:6 is a Messianic passage.

If you take it literally out of the kjv there is no denying that Jesus is the everlasting Father.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,369
4,995
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is outdated because it has been refuted time and time again the same way every time.

Regarding being outdated; Son, fundamental debates are never one and done. Every generation has to decide for itself how to live and what is true and right. The man-is-God thesis is the cause for Original Sin and was shown to be incorrect then and every time since - except when Roman emperor's killed those who didn't submit to imperial proclamation.

Regarding being refuted; nonsense. Just because men in the 4th century embraced dualism and mysticism does not hold up to scrutiny any more now than it did then. There simply is no verse that reads something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever. If there were such a verse, it would be the most quoted verse in Scripture by those who claim one’s salvation depends on believing it. The concept of the trinity is so important that in 66 books, it is not mentioned once!

It is just as easy but more valid to say the man-is-God thesis is outdated and has been refuted time and time again the same way every time. ;)
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,369
4,995
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Isaiah 9:6 is a Messianic passage.

If you take it literally out of the kjv there is no denying that Jesus is the everlasting Father.
This is a great example of imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text. Where do you get the idea that Isaiah 9:6 is a Messianic passage since the Jews for 1,000's of years recognized it did not? Excerpts from Isaiah 9:6 – The Child Is Not “God”
1. The Hebrew word “El gibor” is not only used for God.
Notice how the above verse (Ezekiel 32:21) has the exact words as Isaiah 9:6, but in plural. Since the words “El” and “gibor” are used simultaneously together, should the people referred to be Divine like Yahweh? Isaiah 9:6, and Ezekiel are both the same, except in Ezekiel 32:21 it is used in plural. If Christian trinitarians are truthful and consistent, why don’t they write in their Bible translations “MIGHTY GODS” in capital letters for Ezekiel 32:21?

2. Isaiah 9:6 is not talking about a future prophecy

3. What Scholars say on Isaiah 9:6:
3.1 scarcely justify a departure from the obvious rendering mighty God in favour of god of a hero and still less a whittling down of the meaning of, to hero, so that the clause means no more than “mighty hero.”
3.2 There are many more Christian Scholars who also agree that Isaiah 9:6 when translated, it should be translated as ‘Mighty Hero’ or ‘Mighty Warrior’, not ‘Mighty God’!
3.3 The term ‘El’ was not exclusively used of beings believed to be really divine (x. 21) but was employed also of men in whom, as invested with
godlike power or authority… The expression Divine warrior describes the child as endued with superhuman prowess.”
3.4 Sixteen different Christian denominations coming together and stating “el gibor” does not mean “Mighty God.” According to them”El gibor” means “Mighty hero” when used for Isaiah 9:6.
3.5 In Jewish culture, if you read the Old Testament, there are many examples where people/prophets been called by “Godly” names.

5. There is “one God” and there is none else besides Him:
The old Testament rejects the “Trinity”. It clearly states there is no god besides God, there is nothing equal to God. We see a lot of missionaries try justify Isaiah 9:6 as a bound rock foundation that God is a “Triune God.” If you take a closer look at the Old Testament, God (Yahweh) makes it clear that there is “no one besides him.” There is no Jesus, No Holy Spirit, just God! Read the following verses that teach pure Monotheism:
  • “To whom will you compare me? Or who is my equal?” says the Holy One.” – Isaiah 40:25
  • “I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me” – Isaiah 45:5
  • “I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.” – Isaiah 43:11
  • “Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.” Isaiah 44:8
  • “Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me…” – Isaiah 46:9
  • “Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.” – Hosea 13:4


 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
11,249
5,326
113
66
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No, I do not have a reading comprehension problem. That Jesus made Himself equal with God by calling God His own Father is the estimation of the author of the gospel of John under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

That is not how it is written...that is why I said that you had problems understanding it.

No, we did not come up with that term because we were losing a debate. The hypostatic union simply means that the Deity of Christ is unified with His humanity in the Person of Jesus Christ.

Ok let me help you out with this....do I have to get on your side of the debate to make it clear...

hypostatic union is a Christological term.....the phrase does not appear in the Bible, but in effect accurate in accordance with the Ecumenical Councils. The most basic explanation for the hypostatic union is Jesus Christ being both fully God and fully man. He is both perfectly divine and perfectly human, having two complete and distinct natures at once. Which equates to man trying to understand God....which is ok as long as it is kept in the context that man does not have the mental or sensory capacities to comprehend any of that....in other words, easier said than understood.

There are a few camps of thought here and I am not going to go over all of them.
The nature of Christ.....Christology. This was a heated debate that eventually made its way to the Ecumenical Councils. What is the nature of Christ? Was He man or a God? Was He man that was made a God? Between God the Father and God the Son who is senior? Why does the character and heart of God the Father and God the Son seem so different. Was Christ a prophet or a God?

Lots of debates that were going on during the time of the Apostles and it all lead up to the Ecumenical Councils. So much information on this I could make it a book.....Christ's ministry starts off kind of rocky, controversies right out of gate. Yahweh impregnated a woman that was betrothed. Now most people are going to think of that like engaged, but in the Mosaic Law and the Jewish culture it is much more than that....And the whole scenario develops some problems.

1..According to Mosaic Law impregnating a woman that was betrothed to another man is adultery. This was a big controversy.
2..The Jews had issues with it because in Pagan mythology it was common for gods to impregnate human females, so the Jews saw this as a Pagan motif trying to infiltrate Judaism. Like we see here on this forum....people believed that angels did not impregnate women and the Jews did not believe God would impregnate a woman.
3..God having relations with a woman was sacrilege to them....even in Christian beliefs this is offensive. So in Christianity this event is left undescribed. Happened somehow....but anything but sex. The belief that sexuality is dirty, nasty, and sinful shows up early in Christianity. So much so that the normal process of Christ's conception and delivery would not be tolerated. Eventually the Church develops a belief that Christ's conception nor His birth had anything to do with the genitals and Miriam was a perpetual virgin.
4..The Jews also had issues with this because they believed that the Messiah would be a fully human warlord king that would take down their oppressors and place them in power over the whole world and they would teach and enforce the Mosaic Law on the world. So this scenario is completely contrary to their understanding of the Messiah or the messianic age that they had been praying and hoping for and believing in for 700 years.
5..And of course inviting the Pagans (Gentiles) into this was sacrilegious to them.
6..In Judaism Elijah is senior to the Messiah.
7..Because of this they were expecting Elijah to return in a fiery chariot to introduce the Messiah in a public way to the nation of Israel.
8..In the Jewish culture if a man showed no interest in women and was not married by the age of 30...it would be assumed that he was homosexual....a disgrace to his family....and it would be sacrilegious for him to assume a position as a religious leader. Of course from the Christian perspective this was something that was normal in this new sect because some of the Apostles were not married either. But the Jews were not ok with this. They were not ok with a man born of a woman being the Son of God. They were not ok with a man-God, that walked among them. They believed a God had to separate Himself from humanity. And they were definitely not ok with a homosexual man-God.
9..To the Jews all of this seemed all to human....in as much as a human conspiracy.
10..Judaism was and is an extremely male dominate religion. No female religious leaders, but there were females in Christ ministry that knew Christ was a God....females that financed His ministry. Miriam, Yeshua's mother knew He was a God....first hand. Messiah more or less means "anointed one" only women anointed Christ. But the Apostles could not use them for examples of proof because the female status in Judaism was like children....they should be seen but not heard.

So why all this about the Jews and the scenarios? The Apostles were Jews and they had to deal with all of this.

So the Apostles started out kind of like behind the eight ball. They started out having to prove that Yeshua is a God. The Son of God but they have to redefine what a son is....in a culture that believes that a son has to be conceived through sex, the Apostles were put in the precarious position of defining a new term. Trying to promote the fact that Yeshua was the real Son of God without being the "real Son" of God.

To make this point as they moved through the New Testament and in effect over compensate, they write that God the Father had given God the Son all authority. They place Him as the Creator God. That He existed before His conception. But according to Yeshua.... Yahweh is His God and His Father. But that is not how the Apostles promote this and by the time the Apostles get done in their attempt to prove Yeshua was a God....nothing is left for God the Father....He is demoted and more or less a janitor with a broom sweeping the halls of Heaven.

But there were a lot of people that do not agree with this and some that believed that Yeshua was not a God....but a prophet. They disagreed on who is senior...Yeshua or Yahweh? The have issues with the seemingly different characters of Yeshua and Yahweh. They disagreed on the nature of the God-man. These disagreements divide Christianity and continue on to the Ecumenical Councils and were debated there among the Christian Bishops.

They could not come to an agreement. Enter Emperor Constantine and he insisted that Christianity be of one belief and would more or less kill any other belief. The Catholic religion has always been about...one belief and the belief that there should only be one belief. So Constantine demanded they come up with a solution......The solution that won out was the doctrine of the Trinity that stated the one God formula. Three persons in one God and it was enforced upon pain of death. Under this doctrine all arguments were made irrielvant....no differences between God the Father and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit...

Unfortunately this doctrine caused more questions than it answered....but it did stop the arguments in any official forum. But it set up kind of a conundrum. If the one God formula was true, no action or event could be contributed to any one of them....and Yeshua, and Yahweh, and the Holy Spirit were all nailed on the cross.

So as far as your debate that the Bible indicates that Yeshua is God Almighty and the Creator God....you are correct.

Still there are people that do not believe that and disagree with the Bible....of course they are not going to admit it...that is funny.
But to be honest I too disagree with the Bible on this point. I believe....

Yahweh, God the Father, Supreme God, God Almighty, Creator of heaven, the cosmos, and earth and Adam and Eve.
Yeshua, the real Son of God, a full fledged God, Messiah, and Savior of humanity.
Holy Spirit the unnamed God, a full fledged God, teacher, guide, nourcherer, strengthener, giver of the Christian conscience.

All separate Gods that form a Godhead and sit on three thrones. Separate presence, separate minds, separate wills, separate characters.

I believe that Yeshua is the real and true Son of Yahweh....conceived the normal way.

So that should give you something to think about!
 
Last edited:

True Faith

Active Member
Jul 21, 2022
776
40
28
50
Morristown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This of course is a lie from the pit of hell.

I know that the truth dwells within me because I am a child of God. His Spirit bears witness with my spirit that it is so (Romans 8:16).

I confess that Jesus is the Christ!

Then you confess that Jesu is not God the Son...

Isaiah 9:6 is a Messianic passage.

If you take it literally out of the kjv there is no denying that Jesus is the everlasting Father.

An that one goes directly against "The Father is not the Son" portion of the Doctrine of the Trinity...

Why contradict yourself...
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Regarding being outdated; Son, fundamental debates are never one and done. Every generation has to decide for itself how to live and what is true and right. The man-is-God thesis is the cause for Original Sin and was shown to be incorrect then and every time since - except when Roman emperor's killed those who didn't submit to imperial proclamation.

Regarding being refuted; nonsense. Just because men in the 4th century embraced dualism and mysticism does not hold up to scrutiny any more now than it did then. There simply is no verse that reads something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever. If there were such a verse, it would be the most quoted verse in Scripture by those who claim one’s salvation depends on believing it. The concept of the trinity is so important that in 66 books, it is not mentioned once!

It is just as easy but more valid to say the man-is-God thesis is outdated and has been refuted time and time again the same way every time. ;)

It is actually more valid to say that the concept that Jesus is less than the Father as concerning His Deity has been refuted by John 5:18.

When looking at John 5:18 in conjunction with John 14:28, the hypostatic union is the logical conclusion.

And while there is no verse or passage that says you will die in your sins for denying the Trinity...

There is a verse, if you understand it, that teaches that denying the doctrine of the Deity of Christ means that you will die in your sins.

And the Jesus-is-God thesis has never been refuted; for it is sound doctrine of the holy scriptures. The only way you can even attempt to refute it is to go outside of the realm of holy scripture and in that you would no longer be involved in orthodox Christianity.
 
Last edited:

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That is not how it is written...that is why I said that you had problems understanding it.

Ok let me help you out with this....do I have to get on your side of the debate to make it clear...

hypostatic union is a Christological term.....the phrase does not appear in the Bible, but in effect accurate in accordance with the Ecumenical Councils.
The most basic explanation for the hypostatic union is Jesus Christ being both fully God and fully man. He is both perfectly divine and perfectly human, having two complete and distinct natures at once. Which equates to man trying to understand God....which is ok as long as it is kept in the context that man does not have the mental or sensory capacities to comprehend any of that....in other words, easier said than understood.

There are a few camps of thought here and I am not going to go over all of them.
The nature of Christ.....Christology. This was a heated debate that eventually made its way to the Ecumenical Councils. What is the nature of Christ? Was He man or a God? Was He man that was made a God? Between God the Father and God the Son who is senior? Why does the character and heart of God the Father and God the Son seem so different. Was Christ a prophet or a God?

Lots of debates that were going on during the time of the Apostles and it all lead up to the Ecumenical Councils. So much information on this I could make it a book.....Christ's ministry starts off kind of rocky, controversies right out of gate. Yahweh impregnated a woman that was betrothed. Now most people are going to think of that like engaged, but in the Mosaic Law and the Jewish culture it is much more than that....And the whole scenario develops some problems.

1..According to Mosaic Law impregnating a woman that was betrothed to another man is adultery. This was a big controversy.
2..The Jews had issues with it because in Pagan mythology it was common for gods to impregnate human females, so the Jews saw this as a Pagan motif trying to infiltrate Judaism. Like we see here on this forum....people believed that angels did not impregnate women and the Jews did not believe God would impregnate a woman.
3..God having relations with a woman was sacrilege to them....even in Christian beliefs this is offensive. So in Christianity this event is left undescribed. Happened somehow....but anything but sex. The belief that sexuality is dirty, nasty, and sinful shows up early in Christianity. So much so that the normal process of Christ's conception and delivery would not be tolerated. Eventually the Church develops a belief that Christ's conception nor His birth had anything to do with the genitals and Miriam was a perpetual virgin.
4..The Jews also had issues with this because they believed that the Messiah would be a fully human warlord king that would take down their oppressors and place them in power over the whole world and they would teach and enforce the Mosaic Law on the world. So this scenario is completely contrary to their understanding of the Messiah or the messianic age that they had been praying and hoping for and believing in for 700 years.
5..And of course inviting the Pagans (Gentiles) into this was sacrilegious to them.
6..In Judaism Elijah is senior to the Messiah.
7..Because of this they were expecting Elijah to return in a fiery chariot to introduce the Messiah in a public way to the nation of Israel.
8..In the Jewish culture if a man showed no interest in women and was not married by the age of 30...it would be assumed that he was homosexual....a disgrace to his family....and it would be sacrilegious for him to assume a position as a religious leader. Of course from the Christian perspective this was something that was normal in this new sect because some of the Apostles were not married either. But the Jews were not ok with this. They were not ok with a man born of a woman being the Son of God. They were not ok with a man-God, that walked among them. They believed a God had to separate Himself from humanity. And they were definitely not ok with a homosexual man-God.
9..To the Jews all of this seemed all to human....in as much as a human conspiracy.
10..Judaism was and is an extremely male dominate religion. No female religious leaders, but there were females in Christ ministry that knew Christ was a God....females that financed His ministry. Miriam, Yeshua's mother knew He was a God....first hand. But the Apostles could not use them for examples of proof because the female status in Judaism was like children....they should be seen but not heard.

So why all this about the Jews and the scenarios? The Apostles were Jews and they had to deal with all of this.

So the Apostles started out kind of like behind the eight ball. They started out having to prove that Yeshua is a God. The Son of God but they have to redefine what a son is....in a culture that believes that a son has to be conceived through sex. So the Apostles were trying to promote the fact that Yeshua was the real Son of God without being the "real Son" of God.

So as they move through the New Testament they write that God the Father had given God the Son all authority. They place Him as the Creator God. That He existed before His conception. But according to Yeshua....Yahweh is His God and His Father. But that is not how the Apostles promote this and by the time the Apostles get done in their attempt to prove Yeshua was a God....nothing is left for God the Father....He is more or less a janitor with a broom sweeping the halls of Heaven.

But there were a lot of people that do not agree with this and some that believed that Yeshua was not God....but a prophet. They disagreed on who is senior...Yeshua or Yahweh? The have issues with the seemingly different characters of Yeshua and Yahweh. They disagreed on the nature of the God-man. These disagreements divide Christianity and continue on to the Ecumenical Councils and were debated there among the Christian Bishops.

They could not come to an agreement. Enter Emperor Constantine and he insisted that Christianity be of one belief and would more or less kill any other belief. The Catholic religion has always been about...one belief and the belief that there should only be one belief. So Constantine demanded they come up with a solution......The solution that won out was the doctrine of the Trinity that stated the one God formula. Three persons in one God and it was enforced upon pain of death. Under this doctrine all arguments were made irrielvant....no differences between God the Father and God the Son and God the Holy Spirit...

Unfortunately this doctrine caused more questions than it answered....but it did stop the arguments in any official forum. But it set up kind of a conundrum. If the one God formula was true, no action or event could be contributed to any one of them....and Yeshua, and Yahweh, and the Holy Spirit were all nailed on the cross.

So as far as your debate that the Bible indicates that Yeshua is God Almighty and the Creator God....you are correct.

Still there are people that do not believe that and disagree with the Bible....of course they are not going to admit it...that is funny.
But to be honest I too disagree with the Bible on this point. I believe....

Yahweh, God the Father, Supreme God, God Almighty, Creator of heaven, the cosmos, and earth and Adam and Eve.
Yeshua, the real Son of God, a full fledged God, Messiah, and Savior of humanity.
Holy Spirit the unnamed God, a full fledged God, teacher, guide, nourcherer, strengthener, giver of the Christian conscience.

All separate Gods that form a Godhead and sit on three thrones. Separate presence, separate minds, separate wills, separate characters.

I believe that Yeshua is the real and true Son of Yahweh....conceived the normal way.

So that should give you something to think about!

Not really. I will never subscribe to Tritheism; which is what you are purporting.

I believe what it says in James 2:19.
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Then you confess that Jesu is not God the Son...



An that one goes directly against "The Father is not the Son" portion of the Doctrine of the Trinity...

Why contradict yourself...
The Father is not the Son (being not in flesh); but the Son is the same Spirit as the Father; dwelling in human flesh.

I confess that Jesus is God the Son and I confess that Jesus is the Christ.

What scripture leads you to believe that I cannot confess both things?
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This is a great example of imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text. Where do you get the idea that Isaiah 9:6 is a Messianic passage since the Jews for 1,000's of years recognized it did not? Excerpts from Isaiah 9:6 – The Child Is Not “God”
1. The Hebrew word “El gibor” is not only used for God.
Notice how the above verse (Ezekiel 32:21) has the exact words as Isaiah 9:6, but in plural. Since the words “El” and “gibor” are used simultaneously together, should the people referred to be Divine like Yahweh? Isaiah 9:6, and Ezekiel are both the same, except in Ezekiel 32:21 it is used in plural. If Christian trinitarians are truthful and consistent, why don’t they write in their Bible translations “MIGHTY GODS” in capital letters for Ezekiel 32:21?

2. Isaiah 9:6 is not talking about a future prophecy

3. What Scholars say on Isaiah 9:6:
3.1 scarcely justify a departure from the obvious rendering mighty God in favour of god of a hero and still less a whittling down of the meaning of, to hero, so that the clause means no more than “mighty hero.”
3.2 There are many more Christian Scholars who also agree that Isaiah 9:6 when translated, it should be translated as ‘Mighty Hero’ or ‘Mighty Warrior’, not ‘Mighty God’!
3.3 The term ‘El’ was not exclusively used of beings believed to be really divine (x. 21) but was employed also of men in whom, as invested with
godlike power or authority… The expression Divine warrior describes the child as endued with superhuman prowess.”
3.4 Sixteen different Christian denominations coming together and stating “el gibor” does not mean “Mighty God.” According to them”El gibor” means “Mighty hero” when used for Isaiah 9:6.
3.5 In Jewish culture, if you read the Old Testament, there are many examples where people/prophets been called by “Godly” names.

5. There is “one God” and there is none else besides Him:
The old Testament rejects the “Trinity”. It clearly states there is no god besides God, there is nothing equal to God. We see a lot of missionaries try justify Isaiah 9:6 as a bound rock foundation that God is a “Triune God.” If you take a closer look at the Old Testament, God (Yahweh) makes it clear that there is “no one besides him.” There is no Jesus, No Holy Spirit, just God! Read the following verses that teach pure Monotheism:



    • “To whom will you compare me? Or who is my equal?” says the Holy One.” – Isaiah 40:25
    • “I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me” – Isaiah 45:5
    • “I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.” – Isaiah 43:11
    • “Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.” Isaiah 44:8
    • “Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me…” – Isaiah 46:9
    • “Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.” – Hosea 13:4


I think I'm just going to let the blind be leaders of the blind here.

Those who want to deny Christ's Deity can certainly latch onto your teaching and maybe even be reinforced in their belief.

I will say that what that means for them is that they will die in their sins (John 8:24).
 

True Faith

Active Member
Jul 21, 2022
776
40
28
50
Morristown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Father is not the Son (being not in flesh); but the Son is the same Spirit as the Father; dwelling in human flesh.

I confess that Jesus is God the Son and I confess that Jesus is the Christ.

What scripture leads you to believe that I cannot confess both things?

Well your doctrine states that Jesus is God Himself and not the Son of God because God Himself took on Humanity and not God the Son... so there's that...
 

heartwashed

Active Member
Jul 18, 2022
356
54
28
51
LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well your doctrine states that Jesus is God Himself and not the Son of God because God Himself took on Humanity and not God the Son... so there's that...
Jesus is the Son of God in that He took on human flesh.