The WRATH of God poured out on Christ … where?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

ChristisGod

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2020
7,046
3,949
113
65
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You can't see the truth

Well let us see if you can see all the truth below from the Bible not man made doctrines that you believe.

Though often taught from the pulpit and widely accepted within Christianity, there is a common misnomer that God cannot look upon sin.


This misnomer or idea is rooted in a misunderstanding of Habakkuk 1:13, which states, "Your eyes are too pure to look upon evil." To expand upon the meaning of this verse, God cannot look at sin favorably or with complacency. However, this verse does not state that God cannot look at sin or that He cannot allow sin in His presence. God did not turn His back on Adam when he sinned--God sought him out. God did not turn His back on David when he sinned. In the book of Job, God allowed satan in His presence for a specific purpose. Satan wanted to make a deal with God over His servant, Job. God restricted Satan, telling him that he "can do anything but touch Job" and not to "lay a hand or finger on him." In the wilderness, Jesus allowed the presence of satan (face to face).


Jesus did not turn His back on Saul when he was persecuting the church and sought him out on the Damascus Road and said to him," why are you persecuting Me?" If God did not turn His back on sinners, then neither did the Father turn His back on His only Son who is Holy, Blameless, Sinless, and Righteous just like His Father. The Father turning His back on the Son (at the cross) is not found in Scripture. Jesus ate with sinners, lived among sinners, loves sinners and He suffered and died for sinners.


Wrath- strongs 3709 ὀργή is defined in the Greek lexicon as anger, retribution, vengeance, and indignation. God is not against Himself angrily displaying wrath from the Father to the Son. God is love. In love, He sent His Son. The wrath bearing Son is a new concept not found in Scripture nor the early church fathers (ECFs). God is not against Himself. No one in the Trinity is in opposition, no conflict, no dissension, no strife, no disunity, no dysfunction. As if God were somehow like a sinful human family. There is nothing broken in Our Blessed Trinity.

Jesus bearing God’s wrath and being despised and forsaken by the Father and Him turning His back on the Son is not found in the pages of Scripture. That doctrine was developed in the dark ages during the Reformation and called Penal Substitution Theory of the Atonement or PSA.

Below we see calvins own opinions but its not what the passage actually says. He is reading his own doctrines into scripture which is " EIGEGESIS " not exegesis.

Calvin's comments on Galatians 3:13,


"He could not cease to be the object of his Father’s love, and yet he endured his wrath. For how could he reconcile the Father to us, if he had incurred his hatred and displeasure? We conclude, that he “did always those things that pleased” (John 8:29) his Father. Again, how would he have freed us from the wrath of God, if he had not transferred it from us to himself? Thus, “he was wounded for our transgressions,” (Isaiah 53:5,) and had to deal with God as an angry judge."


The following scriptures affirm that Jesus' relationship with the Father on the cross was still there and not broken.


Psalm 22:24
For he has not despised or scorned
the suffering of the afflicted one;
he has not hidden his face from him
but has listened to his cry for help
.

Luke 23:46
Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last.

John 16:32
"A time is coming and in fact has come when you will be scattered, each to your own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me."

Hebrews 5:7
During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with fervent cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.


Jesus' promise to the thief on the cross that today you will be with Me in Paradise reaffirms Jesus went to be with the Father and not suffer in hell as some teach.


Jesus bearing God's “cup of wrath” and being despised and forsaken by the Father and Him turning His back on the Son is not found in Scripture.

In Matthew 26:39, Jesus says, "If it be your will, let this cup pass from me." Jesus tells us precisely what the cup was. It was the cup of his suffering, which meant that He would die an agonizing death as a martyr. In the passage below, Jesus told His disciples that they would also drink of the same "cup":


Matthew 20:17-23
Now Jesus was going up to Jerusalem. On the way, he took the Twelve aside and said to them, 18 “We are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law. They will condemn him to death 19 and will hand him over to the Gentiles to be mocked and flogged and crucified. On the third day he will be raised to life!”20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him. 21 “What is it you want?” he asked. She said, "Grant that one of these two sons of mine may sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom."22 “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said to them. “Can you drink the cup I am going to drink?” “We can,” they answered. 23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.”


1 Thessalonians 5:9-For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.


As we see above it was not the cup of wrath Jesus was speaking about but it was the suffering He was going to have to endure for our sins. God has not appointed us to wrath and the cup means the suffering of Jesus and that the disciples would also suffer death as martyrs. In fact, many scriptures testify that believers too will suffer persecution for being a follower of Jesus. Suffering persecution is a promise for a believer who follows Jesus, it is something we should expect to happen in our life.


2 Timothy 3:12- Yes, and everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.


John 15:20
Remember the word that I spoke to you: 'No servant is greater than his master.' If they persecuted Me, they will persecute you as well; if they kept My word, they will keep yours as well.


Matthew 5:10 - Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.


2 Corinthians 4:9- persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed.


Wrath from God is not required for the forgiveness of sins, that is a misnomer.


Exodus 34:6
Then the LORD passed by in front of him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD God, compassionate and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in faithfulness and truth;


Isaiah 48:9
For the sake of My name, I will delay My wrath; for the sake of My praise, I will restrain it, so that you will not be cut off.

Psalm 78:38
And yet He was compassionate; He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them. He often restrained His anger and did not unleash His full wrath.

Psalm 85:1-3
You, Lord, showed favor to your land;
you restored the fortunes of Jacob.
2 You forgave the iniquity of your people
and covered all their sins.
3 You set aside all your wrath
and turned from your fierce anger.

The wrath of God (Isaiah 53)

Within the study of the doctrine on PSA, the central O.T. passage it comes from is found in Isaiah 53. Let us look at how the N.T. quotes Isaiah 53 and see how the N.T. writers viewed the passages and used them in the N.T. and what language from Isaiah 53 they applied to Jesus in the N.T. regarding suffering.

In doing so, a few things stand out. There is no penal aspect/ language Isaiah used that is carried over in the N.T. but that of substitution. Isaiah 53:4- WE (not God) considered Him punished by God. The following NT passages quote Isaiah 53: Matthew 8:14-17; Mark 15:27-32; John 12:37-41; Luke 22:35-38; Acts 8:26-35; Romans 10:11-21; and 1 Peter 2:19-25.

hope this helps !!!
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2019
1,889
948
113
63
Port Richey, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Obviously this is a matter you dont understand. Your argument is from silence since the bible not once says Jesus didnt suffer wrath and anger from God.
Not once does the Bible say that the Son’s of Thunder located Judas and beat him within an inch of his life for betraying Jesus … does that mean that it happened? :confused:
 

brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
5,078
504
113
67
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well let us see if you can see all the truth below from the Bible not man made doctrines that you believe.

Though often taught from the pulpit and widely accepted within Christianity, there is a common misnomer that God cannot look upon sin.


This misnomer or idea is rooted in a misunderstanding of Habakkuk 1:13, which states, "Your eyes are too pure to look upon evil." To expand upon the meaning of this verse, God cannot look at sin favorably or with complacency. However, this verse does not state that God cannot look at sin or that He cannot allow sin in His presence. God did not turn His back on Adam when he sinned--God sought him out. God did not turn His back on David when he sinned. In the book of Job, God allowed satan in His presence for a specific purpose. Satan wanted to make a deal with God over His servant, Job. God restricted Satan, telling him that he "can do anything but touch Job" and not to "lay a hand or finger on him." In the wilderness, Jesus allowed the presence of satan (face to face).


Jesus did not turn His back on Saul when he was persecuting the church and sought him out on the Damascus Road and said to him," why are you persecuting Me?" If God did not turn His back on sinners, then neither did the Father turn His back on His only Son who is Holy, Blameless, Sinless, and Righteous just like His Father. The Father turning His back on the Son (at the cross) is not found in Scripture. Jesus ate with sinners, lived among sinners, loves sinners and He suffered and died for sinners.


Wrath- strongs 3709 ὀργή is defined in the Greek lexicon as anger, retribution, vengeance, and indignation. God is not against Himself angrily displaying wrath from the Father to the Son. God is love. In love, He sent His Son. The wrath bearing Son is a new concept not found in Scripture nor the early church fathers (ECFs). God is not against Himself. No one in the Trinity is in opposition, no conflict, no dissension, no strife, no disunity, no dysfunction. As if God were somehow like a sinful human family. There is nothing broken in Our Blessed Trinity.

Jesus bearing God’s wrath and being despised and forsaken by the Father and Him turning His back on the Son is not found in the pages of Scripture. That doctrine was developed in the dark ages during the Reformation and called Penal Substitution Theory of the Atonement or PSA.

Below we see calvins own opinions but its not what the passage actually says. He is reading his own doctrines into scripture which is " EIGEGESIS " not exegesis.

Calvin's comments on Galatians 3:13,


"He could not cease to be the object of his Father’s love, and yet he endured his wrath. For how could he reconcile the Father to us, if he had incurred his hatred and displeasure? We conclude, that he “did always those things that pleased” (John 8:29) his Father. Again, how would he have freed us from the wrath of God, if he had not transferred it from us to himself? Thus, “he was wounded for our transgressions,” (Isaiah 53:5,) and had to deal with God as an angry judge."


The following scriptures affirm that Jesus' relationship with the Father on the cross was still there and not broken.


Psalm 22:24
For he has not despised or scorned
the suffering of the afflicted one;
he has not hidden his face from him
but has listened to his cry for help
.

Luke 23:46
Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last.

John 16:32
"A time is coming and in fact has come when you will be scattered, each to your own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me."

Hebrews 5:7
During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with fervent cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.


Jesus' promise to the thief on the cross that today you will be with Me in Paradise reaffirms Jesus went to be with the Father and not suffer in hell as some teach.


Jesus bearing God's “cup of wrath” and being despised and forsaken by the Father and Him turning His back on the Son is not found in Scripture.

In Matthew 26:39, Jesus says, "If it be your will, let this cup pass from me." Jesus tells us precisely what the cup was. It was the cup of his suffering, which meant that He would die an agonizing death as a martyr. In the passage below, Jesus told His disciples that they would also drink of the same "cup":


Matthew 20:17-23
Now Jesus was going up to Jerusalem. On the way, he took the Twelve aside and said to them, 18 “We are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law. They will condemn him to death 19 and will hand him over to the Gentiles to be mocked and flogged and crucified. On the third day he will be raised to life!”20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him. 21 “What is it you want?” he asked. She said, "Grant that one of these two sons of mine may sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom."22 “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said to them. “Can you drink the cup I am going to drink?” “We can,” they answered. 23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.”


1 Thessalonians 5:9-For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.


As we see above it was not the cup of wrath Jesus was speaking about but it was the suffering He was going to have to endure for our sins. God has not appointed us to wrath and the cup means the suffering of Jesus and that the disciples would also suffer death as martyrs. In fact, many scriptures testify that believers too will suffer persecution for being a follower of Jesus. Suffering persecution is a promise for a believer who follows Jesus, it is something we should expect to happen in our life.


2 Timothy 3:12- Yes, and everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.


John 15:20
Remember the word that I spoke to you: 'No servant is greater than his master.' If they persecuted Me, they will persecute you as well; if they kept My word, they will keep yours as well.


Matthew 5:10 - Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.


2 Corinthians 4:9- persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed.


Wrath from God is not required for the forgiveness of sins, that is a misnomer.


Exodus 34:6
Then the LORD passed by in front of him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD God, compassionate and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in faithfulness and truth;


Isaiah 48:9
For the sake of My name, I will delay My wrath; for the sake of My praise, I will restrain it, so that you will not be cut off.

Psalm 78:38
And yet He was compassionate; He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them. He often restrained His anger and did not unleash His full wrath.

Psalm 85:1-3
You, Lord, showed favor to your land;
you restored the fortunes of Jacob.
2 You forgave the iniquity of your people
and covered all their sins.
3 You set aside all your wrath
and turned from your fierce anger.

The wrath of God (Isaiah 53)

Within the study of the doctrine on PSA, the central O.T. passage it comes from is found in Isaiah 53. Let us look at how the N.T. quotes Isaiah 53 and see how the N.T. writers viewed the passages and used them in the N.T. and what language from Isaiah 53 they applied to Jesus in the N.T. regarding suffering.

In doing so, a few things stand out. There is no penal aspect/ language Isaiah used that is carried over in the N.T. but that of substitution. Isaiah 53:4- WE (not God) considered Him punished by God. The following NT passages quote Isaiah 53: Matthew 8:14-17; Mark 15:27-32; John 12:37-41; Luke 22:35-38; Acts 8:26-35; Romans 10:11-21; and 1 Peter 2:19-25.

hope this helps !!!
I already looked at this the first time. Nothing here to discount Christ endureing the wrath of God for sin charged to Him.

Besides that, we dont even believe in the same Jesus Christ. Dont you believe in the jesus that loved all mankind and died for all mankind making everybodys salvation possible ?
 

ChristisGod

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2020
7,046
3,949
113
65
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I already looked at this the first time. Nothing here to discount Christ endureing the wrath of God for sin charged to Him.

Besides that, we dont even believe in the same Jesus Christ. Dont you believe in the jesus that loved all mankind and died for all mankind making everybodys salvation possible ?
Correct you believe in a false christ who did not die for the sins of the world , was not the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world and One who did not tge propitiation for the sins of the whole world . That’s an anti christ .

hope this helps !!!
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,602
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Not once does the Bible say that the Son’s of Thunder located Judas and beat him within an inch of his life for betraying Jesus … does that mean that it happened? :confused:
Evidence. The person making the positive claim has the burden of evidence in support of the claim.

For some reason, you are supposing a claim void of evidence.
 

brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
5,078
504
113
67
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Correct you believe in a false christ who did not die for the sins of the world , was not the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world and One who did not tge propitiation for the sins of the whole world . That’s an anti christ .

hope this helps !!!
Yes the Christ I believe in died only for the election of Grace and it saved them!
 

quietthinker

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2018
13,887
8,812
113
FNQ
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Yes the Christ I believe in died only for the election of Grace and it saved them!
The first few chapters of Acts tells us why Jesus died.....has it not been read? 'We' killed him!!
It is possible to put any spin on why Jesus died just as politicians put spin on their issues or a used car sales man puts on his product however, IF 'we' had not killed him......what then??
 

brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
5,078
504
113
67
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The first few chapters of Acts tells us why Jesus died.....has it not been read? 'We' killed him!!
It is possible to put any spin on why Jesus died just as politicians put spin on their issues or a used car sales man puts on his product however, IF 'we' had not killed him......what then??
I know who Christ died for, Gods Elect !
 

ChristisGod

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2020
7,046
3,949
113
65
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You calling the Truth heresy, not good my friend.
I'm calling the false god/christ who damns most of humanity to hell for eternity before the foundation of the world without a choice to be saved.

That false god is no better then the jihad muslim god who hates and doesn't love anyone outside its cult.

Any more strawman ?
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,429
14,850
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
WRATH: strong vengeful anger (Merriam-Webster)

There is a good conversation to be had on the subject of “Jesus and the wrath of God”.
WRATH implies punishment inflicted in anger.

Where is the scripture verse that ever actually says that God (the Father) was EVER angrily punishing Jesus in our place?


I would never suggest that Jesus did not suffer the punishment of God for the sins of men, since there are too many verses that clearly state that.

Nor would I EVER suggest that God will not pour out His wrath on those that reject the salvation offered in Jesus Christ (typically mentioned as part of a final judgement to come).

However, God has also said "The person who sins will die. A son will not suffer [the punishment] for the father's guilt, nor will a father suffer [the punishment] for the son's guilt; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.” - Ezekiel 18:20 [NASB20]

Is that not exactly what we claim that God has done when we say that the WRATH of the Father (God) fell on Jesus … angrily punished the innocent for the sin of the guilty?

I would prefer to see a verse that EXPLICITLY supported that claim.
(Now that is a conversation worth having.)

Correct...God certainly was not angry with Jesus.

God made His Word, both a Sacrifice and Savior (and EXAMPLE)...FOR any man willing to Believe AND Sacrifice his own life For the Lord and (Accept by, through, of a mans true heartful confession,) Gods Forgiveness, Salvation and Quickening.

Those who steadfastly DO not Believe, Reject Sacrificing their own Life, Reject Gods Forgiveness, Salvation, Quickening....Shall suffer the consequences of (First the Lambs Wrath), (Then the Devils Wrath), (Then Gods Wrath), Death and Be forever Separated from God and forgotten.

“The Example”...remember stiffnecked OT men begging to SEE God, because they could not BELIEVE by “hearing”?
God promised them...they would SEE.
* God sent His Word for them TO SEE.
...What they SAW, was not what they expected...
A plain common Jewish looking man kind of thing, from some place of no importance, without a kingdom, without a crown, without a title of nobility, without an army, without piles of wealth/gold and to boot, walking around preaching things that sounded like fanciful made up stories....<—- THAT’S the one, the Jews waited for? REALLY God?
Are you kidding me? (Or so the majority of Jews were whispering.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: atpollard

brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
5,078
504
113
67
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I'm calling the false god/christ who damns most of humanity to hell for eternity before the foundation of the world without a choice to be saved.

That false god is no better then the jihad muslim god who hates and doesn't love anyone outside its cult.

Any more strawman ?
You are speaking against the Truth.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2019
1,889
948
113
63
Port Richey, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Evidence. The person making the positive claim has the burden of evidence in support of the claim.

For some reason, you are supposing a claim void of evidence.
The "For some reason" is because some people are claiming that God poured His WRATH upon JESUS CHRIST ... which also is a "positive claim" that has the "burden of evidence in support of the claim". (So I offered an example of what happens when the burden is shifted to "proving a negative" - as some attempted ... anyone can claim anything without the need to offer any support.)
 

ChristisGod

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2020
7,046
3,949
113
65
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are speaking against the Truth.
unlike you I know the truth, hyper calvinists do not as their false god created most all of mankind for destruction with no chance at salvation via the heresy taught by calvin as double predestination- a doctrine from hell by an unloving monster they call god. calvin himself even called that doctrine " horrific " which he got that part correct. Only an unloving god would create most of man with no chance of salvation and to suffer eternal torment because that false god made them that way and to suffer without hope of doing otherwise.

hope this helps !!!
 

brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2020
5,078
504
113
67
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
unlike you I know the truth, hyper calvinists do not as their false god created most all of mankind for destruction with no chance at salvation via the heresy taught by calvin as double predestination- a doctrine from hell by an unloving monster they call god. calvin himself even called that doctrine " horrific " which he got that part correct. Only an unloving god would create most of man with no chance of salvation and to suffer eternal torment because that false god made them that way and to suffer without hope of doing otherwise.

hope this helps !!!
No way you know the Truth and deny limited effectual atonement, which is the Truth.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2019
1,889
948
113
63
Port Richey, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
unlike you I know the truth, hyper calvinists do not as their false god created most all of mankind for destruction with no chance at salvation via the heresy taught by calvin as double predestination- a doctrine from hell by an unloving monster they call god. calvin himself even called that doctrine " horrific " which he got that part correct. Only an unloving god would create most of man with no chance of salvation and to suffer eternal torment because that false god made them that way and to suffer without hope of doing otherwise.

hope this helps !!!
1. I do not believe that Jon Calvin taught "double-predestination"
2. You appear to use the term "hyper-calvinism" far too freely ... as others misuse "Pelagianism". There are MANY "Calvinists (including this Particular Baptist) and VERY FEW "hyper-calvinists".

hope this helps. :)

CALVINISM DEFINED IN 1 VERSE:

John 6:44
  • "No one can come to Me [Total Inability]
  • unless the Father who sent Me [Unconditional Election]
  • draws him; [Irresistible Grace]
  • and I will raise him up on the last day.” [Preservation of the Saints]