God uses the gift of "divers kinds of tongues" wherever it is needed.
It is not to be confused with "unknown tongues" in 1 Cor 14.
still not the same as Pentecostal babbling tongues
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God uses the gift of "divers kinds of tongues" wherever it is needed.
It is not to be confused with "unknown tongues" in 1 Cor 14.
So both faith and baptism are required?
What is the difference? 2000 years?still not the same as Pentecostal babbling tongues
Yes. Trusting God is necessary and the baptism of the Spirit is necessary.
What is the difference? 2000 years?
what is baptism of the spirit?
Correct.their tongues were foreign languages!
Strong debunks the KJV translators?
Correct.
They recieved the Holy Ghost along with the gift of "divers kinds of tongues"(various known languages).
The modern translations, which say exactly opposite of much of the KJV are what's out in left field.Now you way off in left field.
You just debunked the KJV with phony Greek.Wait a minute. When Apostle Paul was teaching about the gifts in 1 Corinthians 12:10, he was NOT... pointing to the cloven tongue of Pentecost. Paul was pointing to known languages of the world that some have a gift learning. I recall a friend who couldn't get him interested in a career, but when his son joined the Army, they discovered his son had a talent for languages, and sent him to language school. He learned Chinese, Aramaic, (and another I don't recall, 3 in total besides his language of birth English).
As a matter of fact also, the word "unknown" in the phrase "unknown tongue" is NOT in the Greek NT manuscripts of 1 Corinthians 4. The KJV translators added that word "unknown".
This is why we can 100% rely upon the Acts 2 Scripture example of what was actually spoken and heard on Pentecost. The Apostles spoke (no doubt hearing in their own language), and when they spoke everyone present understood in 'their' own dialects of birth. God is not the author of confusion like Paul also says.
The modern translations, which say exactly opposite of much of the KJV are what's out in left field.
They were created by biased theologians that disagreed with the wording of the KJV VS their beliefs.
Modern translations are customized, like the NWT is made for the JW's.
That's exactly why you run to them to get a "different" meaning, to fit your presupposition.
You just debunked the KJV with phony Greek.
Crafty.
Modernists believe James Strong over the ancient KJV translators.
This way they too can become closet translators.
Finding new and endless meanings to special words and phrases, to appear smart to new babies in the Lord.
Davy, you used Strongs to debunk your KJV Bible.I agree with your first statements, but not your last one.
I RELY on the 1611 KJV Bible for English, but I also have sets of Interlinear Bibles in the original Hebrew and Greek, and many other scholarly Bible study tools.
And IF I quote from a more modern NT version, it MUST first agree with the Traditional text before I will use it. For example, The Living Bible (a paraphrase Bible) actually has a very good English translation of the subject of another Jesus...
2 Corinthians 11
1 I hope you will be patient with me as I keep on talking like a fool. Do bear with me and let me say what is on my heart.
2 I am anxious for you with the deep concern of God himself—anxious that your love should be for Christ alone, just as a pure maiden saves her love for one man only, for the one who will be her husband.
3 But I am frightened, fearing that in some way you will be led away from your pure and simple devotion to our Lord, just as Eve was deceived by Satan in the Garden of Eden.
4 You seem so gullible: you believe whatever anyone tells you even if he is preaching about another Jesus than the one we preach, or a different spirit than the Holy Spirit you received, or shows you a different way to be saved. You swallow it all.
TLB
That follows the KJV translation closely.
So not all... Scripture in the modern corrupt NT versions is wrong. Their versions is more about OMISSIONS and having been translated from a different Greek text which origins have not been proven as better than the Traditional text. And a text like their Critical text that OMITS Scripture that shows the Deity of Jesus Christ should be a huge red flag about tampering.
Do you think that 1 Cor 14:2 is speaking of known tongues or unknown tongues?You you did not KNOW that the KJV translators ADDED that word "unknown" in the 1 Corinthians 14 Chapter???
1 Cor 14:2-4
2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.
3 But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.
4 He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church.
KJV
If you have an older Strong's Exhaustive Concordance, you'll find that word "unknown" there as the no.999 which means an ADDED WORD.
In my KJV Bible with Strong's provided by BibleSoft, it has ADDED WORDS in Italics.
Apostle Paul was pointing to KNOWN LANGUAGES of the world in that 1 Corinthians 14 Chapter.
Strong was determined to destroy the KJV.That's silly. Dr. James Strong took the Traditional texts used for the KJV Bible and assigned a number to each 'manuscript' word, and gave a definition which a true Strong's Concordance has dictionaries in the back so one can look up ANY WORD in the original Traditional text used for the KJV.
The modern Bible New Testament versions are based on a DIFFERENT TEXT (called the Critical text). Dr. Strong did NOT USE the Critical text, so you are MAKING THINGS UP, TELLING LIES. And now we know why you would choose a word like 'Truther' as an avatar moniker, to try and make folks believe you speak the truth, when you do not.