Covenants, scriptures ... and nothing personal ...
The Millennial Kingdom
You have nothing in response to the truth. Why am i not surprised?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Covenants, scriptures ... and nothing personal ...
The Millennial Kingdom
I only agree with the Prophets that prophecied the return of sacrifices when Jesus returns.
You must think Jesus will hire an advertising agency to have folks continually remember his sacrifice, since he said to only practice the Lord's supper UNTIL HE RETURNS...
Since the lamb was slain from the foundation of the world, Abel's offering was a memorial.
It is like being baptized in the name of Jesus as a memorial to Jesus death.
They duped you into thinking that the lamb was NOT slain from the foundation of the world, and that God cannot transcend time.
So, where does your Bible say that only the ceremonial Law is ended and the rest are intact?
Do you agree with the moral Law parts that command burning homosexuals and stoning adulterers?
Howbout Sabbath? Which category does that fall under, since we can kill folks for not adhering to it?
Please expound on these Laws.
I say the same about those promoting and teaching reformed "Preterist" eschatology in 66-70AD fulfillmentWow! This sums up why every Christian should reject Premillennialism. Defending the doctrine is more important than biblical truth.
I didn't say the blindness was permanent. The scripture says "to this day" (which Paul wrote at least two decades after the death and resurrection) and that all Israel will be saved when the fullness of the Gentiles comes in. That is about to happen on out generation.What you're not understanding is that the blindness of any given Israelite is not permanent. They still have the opportunity to repent. Do you understand that some of those who were cut off back then in Paul's day later repented and became saved? They were grafted back in. That is what Paul was talking about when talking about Israelites being grafted back in. Why do you think he was only talking about the future when he talked about that?
Scripture says "all Israel will be saved". So it is referring a remnant, not 15 million, 1/3. It is an event that will occur, a mass amount like what happened at Pentecost. Of course God lifted the veil of Jews one by one for the last 1990 years as they turned to Christ. So when does it happen? When "every eye sees Him coming in the clouds".But, you're saying the Israelites will no longer be blinded at that point and will be saved. No. That contradicts all the scriptures which indicate that Christ will destroy His enemies when He returns. They won't have any time to repent at that point.
Be careful, you displayed scripture with my content - some my think it is yours!<scripture> then my comment: Israel of the Jewish bloodline) are the remnant to be saved AFTER the Gentiles are full _ complete _ everyone in the Book of Life accounted for).
Who thinks that? The Parisee, who rejected Jesus and put Him to death was blind and remained blind be ause Jesus cursed him to the Gehenna (hell). Amy Jew in any generation who was draw to Christ was saved. No one can come to salvation unless God draws them first. So whoever was saved was ordained by God. Ro.. 11 is stating that "all Israel" will be saved at His return, which will be when the fullness of the Gentile age as been complete.So, it's wrong to think that the ones who are blinded are permanently blinded and then one day God will remove the blindness completely and make it so that none of them are blinded anymore. That is not at all what Paul was saying.
Read the Ezekiel 45 prophecy of the return of the sacrifices in the Millennial reign and weep.Wow! This sums up why every Christian should reject Premillennialism. Defending the doctrine is more important than biblical truth. Premillennialists are more interested in proving what it believes rather than letting the Bible speak for itself. Thanks for confirming what most of us already know!
This statement leaves you in a very precarious position of having to reject all the prophets because none of them “prophesied the return of sacrifices when Jesus returns.”
To present ‘supporting the reintroduction of mass bloodletting of innocent animals for the sins of God’s people in a future millennium’ as the litmus test for you accepting or rejecting the biblical writers is scandalous and heretical. This exposes your faulty approach to Scripture.
No, it does not say "foreordained", which means you don't agree with the Bible wording.You do not seem to grasp simple spiritual truths. This simply means that the Lamb was foreordained from the foundation of the world, just like our salvation. But, the Lamb of God was not slain until Calvary. This is 101 Christianity. Once again you avoid addressing every single argument and embracing every single Scripture.
You must show me a verse on how the OT Law is broken into 3 parts.I just showed you it. Those who have eyes to see will see. Those who do not will not. There is no one as blind as one who cannot see!!!
No. If they reject His salvation today, they are without hope.They will when Jesus returns to save every single one of them from the least to the greatest per Jer 31.
As a matter of fact, because Jesus will be visible to them and communicate with them verbally, they shall cease saying "know the Lord" for they shall all know him. Witnessing to their neighbors will officially cease.
Jesus called the gentile woman a dog.
Is that okay?
You must show me a verse on how the OT Law is broken into 3 parts.
You failed so far.
No, it does not say "foreordained", which means you don't agree with the Bible wording.
As a matter of fact, in Psalm 22, God actually saw the death of Jesus and describes it in detail.
This is the way folks redefine the Bible.
This is how new age religions are formed.
Read the Ezekiel 45 prophecy of the return of the sacrifices in the Millennial reign and weep.
Provide a link to any credible disproof.
More of your grammatical entertainment.
"Dog" was (and still is) a Jewish racist dysphemism for "Gentile".
Keep that entertainment coming.
provide the empirical links that prove we are Jews and we can discuss.
Paul contrasted two Israels here. One was the physical nation of Israel. I highlighted the references to that Israel and the ones who are part of that Israel in red. The other is what many of us call spiritual Israel. I highlighted the references to that Israel and the ones who are part of that Israel in blue.
Notice that Paul said "not all who are descended from Israel are Israel". That statement would make no sense at all if there were not two Israels. What he was saying is that not all who are naturally and physically descended from the nation of Israel are part of spiritual Israel. Why not? He explained that. It's because "it is not the children by physical descent who are God's children". So, he made it clear there that nationality has nothing to do with being a child of God. Instead, "it is the children of the promise" who are "God's children" and "Abraham's offspring".
Awaiting your link.I cannot link to a negative! teh numbers mean nothing if they are not accurate and you they are not! They are based on what ifs, assumptions and could bes. The mathematical results have a 0-100% probability of being accurate and neither you nor I know how much.
but provide the empirical links that prove we are Jews and we can discuss.
So, if you understand that God has never abandoned His people, why do you believe He will restore His people in the future? Why would He need to restore people when He never abandoned them in the first place? I wasn't lying, I was going by things you have said. Maybe you should try to be more clear.