Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ummmmm, WHO or WHAT was Saul persecuting?
You should see your doctor and get him to change your meds.
Too complicated for you, huh?
In other words - Acts 9:4-5 went WAY over your head.
Since the pope is claimed to be Christ on the earth, and the visible head of the church, then Paul must have been persecuting the pope, right?
Another malicious LIE.
Did Bellarmine claim what I quoted, or did he not?
Still waiting for the Scripture describing the Lord's Supper as a "feast". That Scripture does not exist.
In other words the Catechism talks out of both sides of it's mouth. While you can present this truth from a Catholic source, illuminator presents a declaration of mitigation. One can likely find such contradictions in the Catechism for every Catholic doctrine. Best to stay with scripture than rely on the 'infallible' word of mortal sinful men.
You no doubt have some copies of her many books in your library, and you have studied them assiduously to determine whether or not she is a liar right? And no doubt you have numerous examples to offer?
Nonsense. Absolute unadulterated garbage, and your arrogance and presumption that others here are ignorant of the truth, that you can post this and think it. 'educates ' others here who know their history, is the pinnacle of pride and presumption.
The fairy tales were of Catholic origin, and were used to justify claims of Patrick being a Catholic. He wasn't. He was Celtic. As were generations before him. Which is not a dodge, but the answer to your claims that all churches were Catholic, or dissident. The Celtic church was not Catholic, nor dissident, it was apostolic, receiving the gospel through Celtic relations who had colonized Asia minor 300 years before Christ, who had received the gospel from Paul, before he ever had set foot in Rome, and therefore proves the churches he established, and those such as the Celtic church in Britain, the churches in France, and India and Assyria and the far east and elsewhere that grew as a result of missionary efforts by those same churches... And not Rome... And thus were apostolic, and the fruit of the apostles.
Not was superior , but became superior. And not because those in Rome were more in touch with God, or more learned, or wiser, or better informed of scripture, but because they were more politically astute, and had the ear of secular rulers such as Justinian who would send armies to destroy those whom the bishops of Rome disliked. So Rome was superior, but only because it had more power, and used it to compel obedience and subjection.
Which incidentally, is why the office, and by extension the institution that officiates over it, and not the individual, is referenced as the Antichrist in scripture.
HE aint alone either . you should see what the false lil god prosperity preach jessie dulpantis said .
