Quote the passage and show where . . . I don't think it says that, no.That you will be destroyed if you walk in those things?
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Quote the passage and show where . . . I don't think it says that, no.That you will be destroyed if you walk in those things?
The intent was to discuss the fact that the idea that faith can be valid faith or invalid faith (true or false)--which, to me, had never been proven Scripturally, but seemed to merely have been baselessly asserted--actually has Scriptural bases.I'm sorry, I didn't mean to tank your thread! I'll duck out, but if you have something you want to follow up on, either this topic, or your original intent - faith in John's Gospel - let me know.
Much love!
They "believed"... yet, they "believed" in an invalid way... lending itself to the doctrine that "they went out to prove they were never of us".Yes, I agree, they were believing in Him, but not in a way that allowed them to accept what He said. So therefore I'm thinking you are correct here, that they had their own ideas about God, and believed in them.
I've come to see how I can do the same thing, and it often comes to mind how much greater God is than my mind can hold. And how much different He is from me in the way He sees things.
These had believed in Him, but then He said something they couldn't process, that they were slaves, that He could free them. Instead of defending themselves, they should have yielded, submitted, repented.
They had come to believe in Him, but they did not believe Him, when He told them these things.
Compare to Abraham, who believed God, and that believing was credited to Abraham as though he were a righteous man.
Much love!
Clarification : don't want to discuss this topic.Quote the passage and show where . . . I don't think it says that, no.
Much love!
They could not "abide" Christ's Word. Therefore, they didn't really believe in the actual Christ--they were titillated that this could be the one they had waited for, that would do the things they had expected, carnal opinions and hopes about what Messiah would be (eg, "Our fathers ate manna... so, if you want to do a sign for us to believe in, do you think you're gonna make something more bread soon?")--they did "believe", but, since they couldn't endure Christ's Words, they weren't "truly" disciples.These had believed in Him, but then He said something they couldn't process, that they were slaves, that He could free them. Instead of defending themselves, they should have yielded, submitted, repented.
They had come to believe in Him, but they did not believe Him, when He told them these things.
OK. I see it in several places myself. There is true faith, which is saving faith, and there is that which is called faith, or believing, but is not salvific.The intent was to discuss the fact that the idea that faith can be valid faith or invalid faith (true or false)--which, to me, had never been proven Scripturally, but seemed to merely have been baselessly asserted--actually has Scriptural bases.
So, they weren't "truly" disciples.
1. As mentioned in my preface, I don't take James 2 as referring to true and false faith.OK. I see it in several places myself. There is true faith, which is saving faith, and there is that which is called faith, or believing, but is not salvific.
As you've shown in John's Gospel. As James shows in his letter, to which you've pointed. As John shows in his first letter, they went out from us because they were not of us.
The person who identifies as Christian, goes to church, but has not been regenerated.
Much love!
I'm wanting to zero in on "true and false faith".DEMAS... is the exception.
He is a born again believer who left the ministry, because he wanted to go back and enjoy the "worldly life" that he had before he became Paul's born again convert.
And, in his day... at that time.... being a CHRISTian, could get you KILLED, by 20 different methods, including being sawn in half..
Followers of ISLAM will do that to you today, so, best to avoid those devil's.
Timothy, another of Paul's converts, had to drink some wine.....and maybe this is due to the STRESS that the Christian's were under at that time, regarding how dangerous it was to be KNOWN to be a born again follower of Messiah.
Does "false faith" result in regeneration?I'm wanting to zero in on "true and false faith".
No, I'm saying that this invalid faith seems not to result in God placing one into Christ where the eternal life is.Does "false faith" result in regeneration?
Much love!
OK, we are in agreement.No, I'm saying that this invalid faith seems not to result in God placing one into Christ where the eternal life is.
I'm wanting to zero in on "true and false faith".
I was just surprised that true and false faith actually existed in Scripture at all.Here is the end result of "false faith"
A.) "Depart from me, i never knew you".... Jesus said to DISCIPLES who had false faith., and these people were casting out devils "in Jesus's name".
So.....How does a parable define "false faith".??
= Matthew 13:20-22.
This is hearing and accepting..... and that is not same as : "faith that is counted as (Christ's) righteousness = by God".
A way to understand what that means, or how to understand what it means.... to accept that "Jesus saves".... but not really believe it, tho the pretense is there.....
Notice this partial.... "come to the KNOWLEDGE of the Truth".......
See that? That is a room full of unbelievers, and im preaching "The Cross"..., and everyone says...."Yes i believe it"...
And some mean.....>"Yes, i have made the intellectual ascent to the Knowledge, regarding what you have taught as being TRUE"...
And then you have the REAL Believer in the room, who did this...>"faith comes by HEARING" = The Gospel.. and that person went from "Knowledge of the Truth".... all the way into FAITH in their Heart that God accepted to then wash their sin away in the Blood of Jesus and then give then the New Birth of their spirit.
I was just surprised that true and false faith actually existed in Scripture at all.
OK, we are in agreement.
Much love!
I meant there seems to be a continuity between "If you remain in My Word, you will prove you are truly My disciples", and this idea of "invalid/false belief", and "they went out from among us to prove they were never of us".No, I'm saying that this invalid faith seems not to result in God placing one into Christ where the eternal life is.
I meant there seems to be a continuity between "If you remain in My Word, you will prove you are truly My disciples", and this idea of "invalid/false belief", and "they went out from among us to prove the were never of us".
OK, we're on the same page with this.I meant there seems to be a continuity between "If you remain in My Word, you will prove you are truly My disciples", and this idea of "invalid/false belief", and "they went out from among us to prove they were never of us".
I wouldn't necessarily go that far just yet..OK, we're on the same page with this.
There are many who claim to follow Jesus, but have not believed, and received, and have not been reborn. And when push comes to shove, they leave.
These are the seed that fell in the rocky soil. They received with joy, but in times of persecution, they fall away, because there was no root.
Those who have been truly born again have a true faith, that will endure.
Much love!
We seem to be using "faith" to describe a couple of different things.I wouldn't necessarily go that far just yet..
because they received the Word into their hearts, which is, technically speaking, faith...