Many assert James 2 (wherein James calls his Christian audience (he knows they're believers, or else he wouldn't call them "adulteresses against God"--unbelievers who sin are not being "adulterous" to God, since they're not "married" to God) to repent of sin, and to not only have faith, but to also walk in faith (as Paul also says, "if we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit"), and discusses faith that is complete (with works) and incomplete (without works), as Paul warns "the widow who lives in wanton pleasure is dead even while she lives", so we can know the opposite of Christians walking in faith, walking after the Spirit, is Christians living for pleasure, walking after the flesh, leading to death and not life, and sin, which Christians can commit, is pleasure-based) refers to "true" and "false" faith.
I find it distasteful when, in my opinion, people ignore the context, play games, do mental gymnastics, to try to make it fit in to a "faith alone" framework (it obviously doesn't) by claiming James is referring to "true" and "false" faith, and not to complete and incomplete faith.
Having said that, I find it interesting that we do seem to find, in John's Gospel, this concept of "true" and "false" faith.
John 6
14Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world."
15So Jesus, perceiving that they were intending to come and take Him by force to make Him king, withdrew again to the mountain by Himself alone.
...
22The next day the crowd that stood on the other side of the sea saw that there was no other small boat there, except one, and that Jesus had not entered with His disciples into the boat, but that His disciples had gone away alone. 23There came other small boats from Tiberias near to the place where they ate the bread after the Lord had given thanks. 24So when the crowd saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they themselves got into the small boats, and came to Capernaum seeking Jesus. 25When they found Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, “Rabbi, when did You get here?”
26Jesus answered them and said, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled.
So, clearly, though the text says they "believed", this appears to be a categorically invalid "belief", because they "believed", but they "believed" in a "Jesus" that didn't really exist--what they "believed" in was a "Jesus" of their own, and thought that the real Jesus would be the fulfillment of their own "Prophet Who is to come into the world" concepts.
John 8
30As He spoke these things, many came to believe in Him.
31So Jesus was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, “If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine;
32and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
33They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You will become free’?”
34Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin.
We know how this conversation ends--Jesus says their father is the devil--so, though the text says they "believed", their "belief" was not a valid "belief", because their "belief" was not truly in Christ, but it was in a figment of their own imagination that excluded, was antithetical to, the teachings of the true Christ.
I wouldn't want to hide the truth that I see in Scripture, so I thought it was interesting that, though James 2 obviously isn't talking about this, the concept does seem to exist in Scripture. I like to challenge myself, so, though I know it could be used as "ammunition" against my views, I thought it would be interesting to see what happened if I shared it. "He who waters others will himself be watered"--maybe by helping others, I, myself, will be helped, will be given more understanding.
I find it distasteful when, in my opinion, people ignore the context, play games, do mental gymnastics, to try to make it fit in to a "faith alone" framework (it obviously doesn't) by claiming James is referring to "true" and "false" faith, and not to complete and incomplete faith.
Having said that, I find it interesting that we do seem to find, in John's Gospel, this concept of "true" and "false" faith.
John 6
14Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world."
15So Jesus, perceiving that they were intending to come and take Him by force to make Him king, withdrew again to the mountain by Himself alone.
...
22The next day the crowd that stood on the other side of the sea saw that there was no other small boat there, except one, and that Jesus had not entered with His disciples into the boat, but that His disciples had gone away alone. 23There came other small boats from Tiberias near to the place where they ate the bread after the Lord had given thanks. 24So when the crowd saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they themselves got into the small boats, and came to Capernaum seeking Jesus. 25When they found Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, “Rabbi, when did You get here?”
26Jesus answered them and said, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled.
So, clearly, though the text says they "believed", this appears to be a categorically invalid "belief", because they "believed", but they "believed" in a "Jesus" that didn't really exist--what they "believed" in was a "Jesus" of their own, and thought that the real Jesus would be the fulfillment of their own "Prophet Who is to come into the world" concepts.
John 8
30As He spoke these things, many came to believe in Him.
31So Jesus was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, “If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine;
32and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
33They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You will become free’?”
34Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin.
We know how this conversation ends--Jesus says their father is the devil--so, though the text says they "believed", their "belief" was not a valid "belief", because their "belief" was not truly in Christ, but it was in a figment of their own imagination that excluded, was antithetical to, the teachings of the true Christ.
I wouldn't want to hide the truth that I see in Scripture, so I thought it was interesting that, though James 2 obviously isn't talking about this, the concept does seem to exist in Scripture. I like to challenge myself, so, though I know it could be used as "ammunition" against my views, I thought it would be interesting to see what happened if I shared it. "He who waters others will himself be watered"--maybe by helping others, I, myself, will be helped, will be given more understanding.
Last edited: