Apparently you are reading a version of the bible that does not exist.
Paul corrected BAD BEHAVIOR as you've posted.
If he corrected bad behavior...what do you suppose was the reason??
See 1 Cor 6 above.
Those with incorrect behavior WILL NOT see the Kingdom of God.
No, he corrected their bad conduct so that they could enjoy
fellowship with God, more and more. It's this fellowship with God that is the point, after all, of being His child.
1 Corinthians 1:9
9 God is faithful, through whom you were called into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
2 Corinthians 13:14
14 The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all.
1 John 1:3
3 what we have seen and heard we proclaim to you also, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ.
Revelation 3:20
20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me.
Psalm 36:7-9
7 How precious is Your mercy, God!
And the sons of mankind take refuge in the shadow of Your wings.
8 They drink their fill of the abundance of Your house;
And You allow them to drink from the river of Your delights.
9 For the fountain of life is with You;
In Your light we see light.
In sinning, born-again believers never risk their salvation since it is rests entirely in Jesus, not themselves. But they always suffer the loss of the excellence of
fellowship with God when they sin. This is the terrible consequence of their sin. Unfortunately, few Christians these days actually know anything of direct, personal, life-changing fellowship with God. They are caught up, instead, with the sort of impossible moralism that you describe,
@GodsGrace and have no idea how great is the loss of fellowship with their glorious Maker.
So then why not teach, on these forums, that we are to obey God instead of fighting me on this???
If you believe those that do not obey are rebellious, then why not just make this clear?
I have. Many times. But, as you demonstrate here, you've been filtering my posts through the lens of your imagination, assumptions and doctrinal prejudice to such a degree that you cannot actually see what I've been writing. This should disturb you since it's the same thing you've been doing with God's word. And to much the same effect.
Paul was speaking about keeping THE LAW.
How many times must this be stated to another Christian?
Do we not know our own religion?
The Jews know theirs,
The muslims know theirs,
Christians seem to be a bit lost.
I'm not speaking about following THE LAW.
The Law was abolished 2 thousand years ago.
See? Here again you've totally ignored what my point was. Did you not understand it? Or are you just feigning obtuseness in an attempt to deflect from a challenge that you can't answer? As I showed, it is obvious in
Romans 2 that Paul was speaking to law-keeping Jews within the framework of the Old Covenant, not Christians. His remarks in the chapter, then, cannot be legitimately applied to born-again believers as you tried to do.
What?
So God is not timeless?
Please study up on this.
I'm not even going to debate it.
It's kind of like debating whether or not water is wet.
Deflection. If you've got no good answer, just say so. This off-point reply is as obvious in its deflecting purpose as the sun is obvious in the sky.
So then, dear K....
since Jesus was addressing Himself to those under the OC....
I say we throw out the NT and give up on Christianity.
??? You can do as you like. I don't need to respond to what Jesus said, and to who, in the manner you propose here. His words offer no difficulty whatever to what I believe about the eternal security of the believer. This
should suggest to you that your thinking on salvation is awry.
No.
I understand very well what you're saying
AND IT'S NOT CORRECT.
No, you don't understand my view well at all. Which is why there are so many examples in our exchange of you misrepresenting/misunderstanding what my view is. It's fine to disagree with my view - but only if you actually know what it is, which you regularly demonstrate that you don't.
Saying Jesus didn't die for everyone that ever lived is showing how flawed your theology is.
§To say that Jesus died only for those that came after is incredibly mistaken.
But I didn't write this. Your description here of my statments reveals only
your own distortion of what I wrote. You've just assumed - wrongly - that my remark must mean what you assert here that it does. But what I wrote by no means necessitates that I think Jesus died only for those who came after his sacrifice on the cross. Again, this is just
another of
your prejudicial distortions of my view.
I don't know what Jesus said in Matthew 5:48...
you didn't POST it.
Nope. Look it up. Or remain ignorant. Your choice.
This isn't theology 101 K.
I don't think you know what Theology 101 actually is,
@GodsGrace. Your posts in this thread have made this very clear.
BTW,,,you have repeatedly stated how I don't understand anything.
No, not "anything"; only my view (and a great deal of basic Christian doctrine, too). This sort of hyperbolic misrepresentation of what I wrote doesn't help your cause, or your reasoning, any.
Of course everyone in your camp (teaching that good works are not necessary)
See? Just more mischaracterization. I've only said that good works are not necessary to being saved. This, Scripture states explicitly and repeatedly, as I've already shown from Scripture in past posts. But obedience to God
is necessary to
fellowship with Him. There is, in fact, a direct correlation between the believer's obedience to God and the depth of their direct, intimate communion with Him.
I wanted to add:
Those that teach that good works are not necessary,
and that obedience to §God is not necessary...
and PLAINLY state so....
do not love Jesus as HE said the following:
John 14:15
15 "If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.
You see K...I'M not saying this....
JESUS is saying it.
No,
you're the one writing the above, not Jesus. The line of reasoning you've laid out is
yours, not his. And for the many biblical reasons I've given in my posts in this thread, your conclusion is grossly false - and obnoxious.
You have no idea what the character of my life is. None.
Quite frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for writing such a thing. Goodness. How far into unChristlike behavior your error has made you go!
So if you teach that we don't really need to obey God....
But I don't teach this. You IMAGINE or ASSUME this, but it is not what I actually believe, or teach.
You love Jesus?
Teach what HE taught.
Do you honestly believe this sort of rhetorical "lawyering," is going to persuade anyone that you're right and I'm wrong? It's been very... interesting watching you Strawman, jump to conclusions, equivocate, eisegete, gaslight, employ secondhand ad hominem ("Jesus says this, not me") and then project many of these things onto those critical of your view. What's even more interesting, I think, is how much in denial of these things you are. In this, you demonstrate a very...biblical sort of blindness.