M
Muna
Guest
Still not looking past a human origin,
Please, show us your workmanship in the word of God concerning these things so we can clearly mark your path and how you arrive to a thing.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Still not looking past a human origin,
But then again who among our members of this forum are able to think for themselves and present a very different picture of what is happening.
Shalom
Be careful what you ask for...lol.
First of all the number of the beast is in conjunction with the context of 1 Kings 10:14. The power of the Beast with 10H is secular and economic, it is in no way of a Religious origin. Rev. 13 should inform you that the 10H Beast is entirely economic.Hi, Earburner.
Although I agree with you that "ten horns" or ten kings and their kingdoms "shall give their power and strength unto the beast" (Rev. 17:13) in the last days, I have to respectfully disagree with you in relation to the true identity of "the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed" (Rev. 13:12).
As I have already documented, the Papacy's "deadly wound was healed" in 1929 with the signing of the Lateran Treaty. In order for you or anybody else to prove that the EU is "the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed" (Rev. 13:12), you would need to provide documentation that the EU has a "head" or "hill" (Rev. 17:9) that suffered a "deadly wound" at some time in the past, only to later have it "healed." No offense to you personally, but neither you nor anybody else on this planet will ever be able to do so.
When it comes to properly identifying either "the first beast" (Rev. 13:12), the "another beast" (Rev. 13:11), or "BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" (Rev. 17:5), we must examine every descriptor that we are given of the same, and every descriptor must be a perfect match.
Can you prove that the EU has a name that numbers 666?
Can you prove that the EU is the "little horn" or this world's littlest kingdom?
Again, these descriptors, as well as several others, all find their fulfillment in the Papacy and in none other.
"BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" (Rev. 17:5) is Jerusalem.My question to you is, what is your understanding of M, BTG,TMOH?
Yes, there is. Well, that "little horn," the Vatican, is already here.Secondly, there is no "little horn" to come.
You are greatly mistaken.Antiochus Epiphanes was the complete fulfilment of that prophecy in Daniel and 1 &2 Maccabees.
" Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold." (1 Kings 10:14)First of all the number of the beast is in conjunction with the context of 1 Kings 10:14.
How can you claim that "it is in no way of a religious origin" when the "another beast...spake like a dragon" (Rev. 13:11), and the "dragon" is Satan?The power of the Beast with 10H is secular and economic, it is in no way of a Religious origin. Rev. 13 should inform you that the 10H Beast is entirely economic.
Sorry! AE-lV (Antiochus Epiphanes) was the only LH that will ever be. That reality is understood when one does the math of the 2300 days in Daniel and lines it up with Jewish historical record of 1&2 Maccabees. Connect that with the 70 week prophecy, whereby Jesus fulfilled the 70TH week, and by the Holy Spirit you will understand."And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time." (Dan. 7:25)
What you should genuinely be "sorry" about is that you totally ignored the fact that Daniel chapter 7 and Revelation chapter 13 are talking about the same exact "little horn" or little kingdom. I knew that you would not address it. I see no reason to continue our discussion if you are not going to address the scriptures that I reference.Sorry! AE-lV (Antiochus Epiphanes) was the only LH that will ever be. That reality is understood when one does the math of the 2300 days in Daniel and lines it up with Jewish historical record of 1&2 Maccabees. Connect that with the 70 week prophecy, whereby Jesus fulfilled the 70TH week, and by the Holy Spirit you will understand.
You don't understand me too well, but you should. The churches have done a terrible injustice to the 70 week prophecy. They have ripped away the 70th week from the 69th week and moved it out in time to be attached 2500+ years into the future.What you should genuinely be "sorry" about is that you totally ignored the fact that Daniel chapter 7 and Revelation chapter 13 are talking about the same exact "little horn" or little kingdom. I knew that you would not address it. I see no reason to continue our discussion if you are not going to address the scriptures that I reference.
Yes! I AGREE 100%"BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" (Rev. 17:5) is Jerusalem.
As you quoted correctly 1 Kings 10:14, your clue is for you to compare that prophetic statement with the prophecy of Rev. 13:18, which is still in need of fulfillment." Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold." (1 Kings 10:14)
So you claim, but you have not provided any proof of the same. In reality, this is what was prophesied in relation to "666" in the book of Revelation:
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." (Rev. 13:16-18)
According to the word of God, "666" is "the number of his name," and I have already documented how the number of the Papacy's name is "666."
Please, show us your workmanship in the word of God concerning these things so we can clearly mark your path and how you arrive to a thing.
That's a false accusation, and I know the "spirit" behind it.
Be careful what you ask for...lol.
There is very little workmanship in the word here, but he would seek to exclude himself from demonstrating that he is above the rest of the forum.
So certainly, I wouldn't miss it.
When Nameaboveallnames statedThank you for your request but with comments like these who would want to present their understanding?
Let me present the following explanation of my understanding for your consideration.
Because you are not offering anything as far as constructive correction by way of the scriptures.
As a newbie on this forum, unless you have taken the time to read what I have previously posted, you would not know whether or not I have already presented the basis for my position on the entity of the beasts. If you had check my previous posts then you would have read that I have consistently been presenting my position on the entity of the beasts of Daniel 7 including the Little Horn, as being wicked fallen heavenly hosts as Paul described them in Ephesian 6:12: - "and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.", however most members on this forum are still looking at human entities to be the beasts and the Little Horn.
The Daniel 2 Statue Prophecy only deals with the nations that have held or still hold dominion over the Land of Babylon, yet many commentators also link these nations with the beasts and the nation, that chose for a period of time, to inhabit the respective dominions of the four beasts and exhibit the respective beast's dominate characteristic.
But people, believing that they are right, can provide a list of national entities that they claim are the actual 4 winds of heaven beasts as they progressed over time, whereas the beasts consistently span the time period from when they first appeared up to the future time when they are judged and imprisoned in the Bottomless pit for 1,000 years after which they will be released for a Little While Period when they will be dispatched into the Lake of Fire.
Now that I have presented my position, it would be good for you either endorse my position or provided biblical justifications to rebut my postion.
Shalom
On his end I just recognize the work that went into what he has put forth and I can appreciate the detail in his approach.
Nameaboveallnames is a good friend of mine and we disagree on things and he has never cursed me for it. And I him and I have never cursed him for it.I on the other hand find that his approach to people who disagree with him is to put that person down with a "curse."
Just another lie on your part.I on the other hand find that his approach to people who disagree with him is to put that person down with a "curse."
Just another lie on your part.
Why am I not surprised?
That's a false accusation, and I know the "spirit" behind it.