That's hilarious....Perhaps in the eyes of God, the great teacher, the sense of ritual is important...
That is a "whole cloth" concept. Meaning not in the tapestry of Judeo Christianity.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's hilarious....Perhaps in the eyes of God, the great teacher, the sense of ritual is important...
Thanks LoveYeshua.Hello Friend here is my answer I pondered on it for a few days and things gave become clear to me. So
when Jesus told Nicodemus in John 3:5, “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God,” He was speaking of a spiritual birth that He alone could give. This connects directly to what John the Baptist had already declared about Him.
John the Baptist said, “I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming… He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire” (Luke 3:16; Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; John 1:33). John’s water baptism was for repentance, but he made it clear that the true and greater baptism would come from Jesus — the baptism with the Holy Spirit.
Jesus Himself described this “water” as living water, saying, “Whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst… the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain… into everlasting life” (John 4:14) and, “He who believes in Me… out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.” John then explains, “This He spoke concerning the Spirit” (John 7:38–39).
So when Jesus told Nicodemus about being born of water and the Spirit, He was pointing to the same promise John the Baptist had announced — that the Messiah would give the Holy Spirit, cleansing and giving new life to those who believe and obey. Water baptism is the outward sign of repentance, but the living water — the Holy Spirit — is the inward power that causes the true new birth. Without both repentance and the Spirit given by Christ, no one can enter the kingdom of God.
Blessings and Have a good Sabbath.
Here is the Covenant as defined By GOD and Jesus upheld and was teaching;How about you would you like to know what Gods covenant is? Hint, the answer is in John 17, where Jesus prayed to his God that God be in you and you be in Him as one as the Father was in Jesus and Jesus was in the Father as one.
Correct.Here is the Covenant as defined By GOD and Jesus upheld and was teaching;
In the Old Testament, God defined His covenant as His law, especially the Ten Commandments, given to Israel after He freed them from Egypt. At Mount Sinai He said, “Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people” (Exodus 19:5–6 NKJV). God made it plain that the covenant was the Ten Commandments when He “wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments” (Exodus 34:28 NKJV) and again, “So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments” (Deuteronomy 4:13 NKJV). This covenant was an agreement: God promised to be their God, bless and protect them, if they obeyed His voice and kept His law. Jesus in the New Testament did not replace this covenant with something different; instead, He confirmed it, magnified it, and showed that love to God and neighbor is the foundation of all the commandments (Matthew 22:37–40 NKJV). In both the Old and New Testaments, God’s covenant is about obedience from a willing heart, leading to life and blessing.
Now do you know the difference between the Old covenant and the New Covenant?
this discussion does not address the O.P. so if you want to know more PM me.
These two "Christian" writings, Apocryphal books deleted from the bible during the 4th century, are from the very manuscripts now being used to "correct," as Luciferians say, the New Testament and create new versions. These manuscript types (Aleph, B, D, papyrus 75, 45 et al.) were rejected by a growing and discerning Christian body - almost immediately after their creation by the 'friends of Philo'.The Letter of Barnabas...
Hermas...
...the same "Saint" Ignatius, who also said, "Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop...It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.” – Letter to the Smyrnaeans Chapter 8Ignatius of Antioch...
Again, such traditions of men, with their long abandoned and recently revived corrupt manuscripts, bring death.They got it wrong but you got it right? Notice the years and Ignatius especially was a disciple of the apostles but they got it wrong.
I just want to use a sense of humor to express God's wisdom, I was deeply shocked by God's wisdom, God expresses his wisdom and thoughts in every detail. It is often said that details determine success or failure. I think God's skill in dealing with detail is awesome.That's hilarious....
That is a "whole cloth" concept. Meaning not in the tapestry of Judeo Christianity.
But we who are of that new covenant that is not law but is Spirit and who we actually become, the old law for how to is fulfilled in us, it is who we become not what we try and be by law. Trying to follow the law will result in miserable failure every time, but when it actually becomes who we are without trying but actually being, we are made perfect even as our Father in heaven is perfect.Here is the Covenant as defined By GOD and Jesus upheld and was teaching;
In the Old Testament, God defined His covenant as His law, especially the Ten Commandments, given to Israel after He freed them from Egypt. At Mount Sinai He said, “Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people” (Exodus 19:5–6 NKJV). God made it plain that the covenant was the Ten Commandments when He “wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments” (Exodus 34:28 NKJV) and again, “So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments” (Deuteronomy 4:13 NKJV). This covenant was an agreement: God promised to be their God, bless and protect them, if they obeyed His voice and kept His law. Jesus in the New Testament did not replace this covenant with something different; instead, He confirmed it, magnified it, and showed that love to God and neighbor is the foundation of all the commandments (Matthew 22:37–40 NKJV). In both the Old and New Testaments, God’s covenant is about obedience from a willing heart, leading to life and blessing.
Now do you know the difference between the Old covenant and the New Covenant?
this discussion does not address the O.P. so if you want to know more PM me.
We're not going to understand the scripture differently, since there'll only cause divisions and groups, that have resulted to 'denominations'.I did not miss this
I think I might be missing your point as you may understand it, but thats okay, regardless, its good to hear how everyone might understand a thing.
What about Adam Who received the Holy Ghost to know the different from carnality from religion and Spirit and became like God who is that Spirit in Gen 3:22? And Abraham, He received Gods Holy Ghost, Moses, received, Mary received. They were not baptized in water. What about the thief on the cross, he received and when was he baptized in water? And I myself received Gods Holy Spirit within me and open in me His knowledge for who He is and all of His heaven just as He did in all off these, a couple of years before I was dunked in a tank of water. Water doesnt do anything but get you wet.We're not going to understand the scripture differently, since there'll only cause divisions and groups, that have resulted to 'denominations'.
The scripture 'as it is written' is very clear, that when Peter and John 'prayed', the people did not receive the Holy Ghost.
But after water baptizing them and then when Peter and John 'laid their hands' on them, they received the Holy Ghost.
First Peter and John 'prayed', it did not work, but after they water baptized the people and laid their hands on them, it worked.
Even today, no need to pray for believers to receive the Holy Ghost, but rather 'elders' after water baptizing them, 'lay their hands' on them to receive the Holy Ghost.
Shalom in the name of Adonai Yeshua.
If you claim to have received the Holy Ghost, your spirit in you in communion with HIS won't proclaim, Jesus did not come in the flesh.And I myself received Gods Holy Spirit within me and open in me His knowledge for who He is and all of His heaven just as He did in all off these, a couple of years before I was dunked in a tank of water. Water doesnt do anything but get you wet.
I see so Jesus was not made of a woman born under the law as all men are, son of man? If Jesus was not a man, then what was it they crucified for blaspheme? And if he wasnt a man, how did he plead, tortured, ate supper, drank wine.If you claim to have received the Holy Ghost, your spirit in you in communion with HIS won't proclaim, Jesus did not come in the flesh.
Yes just as Jesus was liar for saying who he was in the father by the same as you do me for the very same reason.That's the spirit of anti-Christ which confesses such 'lies', read the given scripture to you.
That is a gross understatement, the gross mistake is most do not follow the ways of Jesus in the Father and you are very clear in that respect. Yo cant relate to at all if you dont have the same spirit in you who was in Jesus, which would be Christ in you.Mistakes can be made, come out of it, rather than justifying further in other things and not related.
Thank you
That's your 'shortsighted' view or parroting someone else's likewise 'shortsighted' view.What about Adam Who received the Holy Ghost to know the different from carnality from religion and Spirit and became like God who is that Spirit in Gen 3:22? And Abraham, He received Gods Holy Ghost, Moses, received, Mary received. They were not baptized in water. What about the thief on the cross, he received and when was he baptized in water?
Again that's according to you being 'shortsighted' in the all scripture and sound doctrine of the Holy Bible.Water doesnt do anything but get you wet.
Many writings were not included in the New Testament..
These two "Christian" writings, Apocryphal books deleted from the bible during the 4th century, are from the very manuscripts now being used to "correct," as Luciferians say, the New Testament and create new versions. These manuscript types (Aleph, B, D, papyrus 75, 45 et al.) were rejected by a growing and discerning Christian body - almost immediately after their creation by the 'friends of Philo'.
Ignatius was taught by John.These two books, The Shepherd of Hermas and The Epistle of Barnabas, spell out in detail the entire New Age scenario, including commands to do the things God specifically forbids, such as:
1. Take 'the name' of the beast.
2. Give 'up to the beast'.
3. Form a one world government.
4. Kill those not receiving his 'name'.
5 Worship female virgins.
6. Receive 'another spirit'.
7. Seek power.
8. Believe that God is immanent in his creation, as a pantheistic, monistic Hindu god.
9. Avoid marriage; permit fornication.
10. Abstain from fasting.
11. Subscribe to the New Age Root Race Theory.
12. Be saved by being baptized and keeping the 'twelve' mandates of the Antichrist.
...the same "Saint" Ignatius, who also said, "Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop...It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.” – Letter to the Smyrnaeans Chapter 8
I don't know what you believe,,,but it seems to me that modern day heresies bring death.And all the sheeple said, "Yes massa, yes massa."
Again, such traditions of men, with their long abandoned and recently revived corrupt manuscripts, bring death.
§"they word is truth"The "early church fathers" are dead. Jesus, the Word, is alive (John 1:14). Choose wisely.
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. (Proverbs 3:5-6)
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. (John 17:17)
.
The early church fathers defended the faith you think you're defending now. You're defending the word of Luther not the word of God.
These two "Christian" writings, Apocryphal books deleted from the bible during the 4th century, are from the very manuscripts now being used to "correct," as Luciferians say, the New Testament and create new versions. These manuscript types (Aleph, B, D, papyrus 75, 45 et al.) were rejected by a growing and discerning Christian body - almost immediately after their creation by the 'friends of Philo'.
These two books, The Shepherd of Hermas and The Epistle of Barnabas, spell out in detail the entire New Age scenario, including commands to do the things God specifically forbids, such as:
1. Take 'the name' of the beast.
2. Give 'up to the beast'.
3. Form a one world government.
4. Kill those not receiving his 'name'.
5 Worship female virgins.
6. Receive 'another spirit'.
7. Seek power.
8. Believe that God is immanent in his creation, as a pantheistic, monistic Hindu god.
9. Avoid marriage; permit fornication.
10. Abstain from fasting.
11. Subscribe to the New Age Root Race Theory.
12. Be saved by being baptized and keeping the 'twelve' mandates of the Antichrist.
...the same "Saint" Ignatius, who also said, "Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop...It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.” – Letter to the Smyrnaeans Chapter 8
And all the sheeple said, "Yes massa, yes massa."
Again, such traditions of men, with their long abandoned and recently revived corrupt manuscripts, bring death.
The "early church fathers" are dead. Jesus, the Word, is alive (John 1:14). Choose wisely.
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. (Proverbs 3:5-6)
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. (John 17:17)
.
The early church fathers
Which SUBSEQUENT THEOLOGY?The early church fathers, were mostly heretics.
Most of them believed that "water washes your sin away" and it doesn't.
So, if a "church father" does not even understand that water is just water, and can't deal with sin, then none of their subsequent theology can be trusted, as if a person can't even understand Jesus's sacrifice as the only WAY that our sin is forgiven, then they are not to be trusted or followed, as they are theologically heretical.
Short sided and someone else's view? I guess your bible doesnt contain Gen 3;22? Or if it does and you say it is short sighted perhaps who ever wrote it was short sighted?That's your 'shortsighted' view or parroting someone else's likewise 'shortsighted' view.
Every man who ever lived dies, and you will not be excluded from the same not even Jesus was excluded from death.For these people you mentioned above did not get to do their water baptism because they 'died'.
The dead in Christ are those who has not received from God His anointing, which would be Christ in you. He raises you from that dead state of religion that obviously you are of and refuse to come to life in Gods Holy Spirit as Adam did, Abraham did, as Moses did, Mary did, Jesus did in Matt 3:16from God Himself, as 120 did and as all today has who has Benn born again with that same renewing of mind that started in Adam, All of these we read of who God came to by the Spirit that He is came to life in Him, raising from the dead state of religions of mans ideas for a god just as you have about a god and reject coming out from that grave you are in and alive in Him.Therefore the living and remain on earth who take water baptism, they are also taking it for the dead who were unable.
I do not follow Paul in his doctrine, I follow Jesus in his. They are not the same doctrine.1 Corinthians 15:
29. Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not al all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
Only to you who never has met God yourself. You are exactly as the Jews were with Jesus, He was short sighted as well as you accuse me of.Again that's according to you being 'shortsighted' in the all scripture and sound doctrine of the Holy Bible.
I do not follow Peters doctrine I follow Jesus doctrine, as in -- John 16:23. And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.1 Peter 3:
21. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward GOD,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
You should try following Jesu in who he said he was in GHod instead of what others said about hi from their own perspectives such as you are doing. Try quoting Jesus sometimes in who he was in God instead of others opinions about him.Colossians 2:
12. Buried with Him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with Him through the faith of the operation of GOD, who hath raised Him from the dead.
Water does not save anyone, Gods salvation come only by God Hiself come to you and open in you who he is and all of his heaven in you. And when, or should I say IF, when you see Him as He is ye shall be like Him 1 John 3:2, instead of like Paul or Peter that you are like instead of like the God who resides in man as Jesus said in Luke 17:20-21.In faith to the Word of GOD, even water baptism does also save us by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Partially right? Half a lie is still a lie. And obviously God who baptizes man by the spirit He is and a renewing of mind to think in His terms instead of mans terms for water, Jesus called born again by that same renewing that he received from God in Matt 3:16 that you call him short sighted even tough you read who Jesus said he was in God .Yes, you're 'partially' right since being 'shortsighted', it doesn't do anything but only get us wet, when is taken in lack of knowledge and faith.
Follow the crowd right into hell instead of Gods kingdom that we are? No way my friend, you follow the crowd and I will follow the one God sent to lead me to the same God who sent him to do exactly that.Since meaninglessly every one are taking water baptism, let's follow the crowd and take it for nothing, i get it.
And we who follow Jesus to the Father and when we see Him as He really is we are like Him. 1 John 3:2.But to those who are disciple in the full knowledge of the scripture and are 'longsighted', in faith we take water baptism in the answer of a good conscience towards GOD.
My old man of flesh, carnal, that was sinful, was buried never to be remembered anymore and came to life in Giods Spirit of mind to be His righteous, holy, pure and without sin. cannot sin because that old man in carnality as yourself has dies and that new man of Gods anointing, Christ, has risen from that grave, that dead state of God Spirit that you are living in this day. So obvious in your rebuttal of Jesus to receive in you the same renting of mind from God Himself that Jesus received in Matt 3:16 and said ye must be born again of it.We're buried with Christ in water baptism and we're also risen with Him through the faith of the operation of GOD.
And all who has His glory as our own disposition of mind, His deity is who we become like Him and in His same image of. It is who we are not what you believe you are as you do, and excluding yourself from the same Spirit be in you who was in Christ Jesus.Glory be only to GOD the FATHER of our Lord Jesus Christ.
SO very true. If water can save you then everyone who takes a shower or a bath is saved. Just jump in and cleanse the body.The early church fathers, were mostly heretics.
Most of them believed that "water washes your sin away" and it doesn't.
So, if a "church father" does not even understand that water is just water, and can't deal with sin, then none of their subsequent theology can be trusted, as if a person can't even understand Jesus's sacrifice as the only WAY that our sin is forgiven, then they are not to be trusted or followed, as they are theologically heretical.
Which SUBSEQUENT THEOLOGY?

Get on track Behold.What fake "subsequent" theology did the Mary Cult "church fathers" , make up, that is not found in any bible, and therefore was not given to them by any Apostle's Letters.
Tradition is second, but whatever you want to believe.All These.. and many more but this will do for now.
-
1.. Sacried Tradition
The Catholic Church views their own Sacred Tradition as their most important source of revelation, meaning that a good majority of Catholic teachings are not found in any verse in any Bible. This contrasts with most Protestant denominations that emphasize sola scriptura(Scripture alone).
I know a priest that teaches theology and speaks about 7 languages and he also does not see purgatory in the NT.2.) . Purgatory
The concept of Purgatory, a state of purification after death for those who die in God's grace but still need cleansing, is not found in the Bible. The MaryCult also prays for souls in purgatory, which again is not found in any verse in any Bible.
Problem with the assumption...3.) Mary's Assumption and Immaculate Conception:
These are Mary Cult doctrines that developed over time and are not found in any verse in any Bible. The Assumption refers to Mary's bodily ascension into heaven, (in her dead body, she flew there).....while the Immaculate Conception refers to Mary being conceived without original sin, which is another MaryCult false doctrine that is not found in any verse in any Bible.
The Apostolic Fathers and the ECFs believed it's Jesus' body.4.). Transubstantiation:
This doctrine, central to the man made MaryCult theology regarding the ""Eucharist"", states that the bread and wine offered in the Mass are transformed into the literal body and blood of Christ. This specific explanation of transubstantiation is not found in any Bible verse in any Bible.
The NT does teach a hierarchy.5.) The Authority of the Pope:
The Catholic Church believes and teaches that the Pope, as the successor of Saint Peter, has a unique authority as the head of the Church, a role not found in the Bible, in any verse, in any bible. The MarCult in fact beleive and teach that He is the mouthpiece of God, Himself. This is not found in any verse in any Bible.
Long story...6.) . Other FALSE Practices and Teachings:
Other False MaryCult practices not found in any verse in any Bible include..
Infant Baptism for Salvation
Takes some attention from Jesus.Veneration of Saints
Yuck.Removing and collecting Dead Body Parts ( RELICS)
A way to teach the story of Jesus.Praying the Rosary
Hmmm. What's this all about?The use of Holy Water
Give her a break.