BreadOfLife
Well-Known Member
- Jan 2, 2017
- 22,505
- 3,785
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
Intercession is doing ANYTHING on behalf of another.ntercession refers to the act of intervening on behalf of another, often in a context of prayer or influence.
Not it is not the very pictrue of intercession. You are making an assumption without evidence that the censors are the saints praying to God on behalf of earthly saints.
In Rev. 5:8 – the Elders in Heaven are taking our prayers to God.
No – “Catholic Church” with a capital C.Bishop/Pastor same thing. it was the catholic church small C.
We see in the Letter to the Smyrnaeans at the beginning of the 2nd century – while the Apostle John was STILL alive, his disciple, Ignatius of Antioch wrote about the “Catholic Church”. A in that same century, we read the document, The Martyrdom of Polycarp:
“When finally he concluded his prayer, after remembering all who had at any time come his way – small folk and great folk, distinguished and undistinguished, and the whole Catholic Church throughout the world – the time for departure came. So they placed him on an ass, and brought him into the city on a great Sabbath.”
The underlined phrase above is proof that they were using “Catholic Church” as a TITLE and NOT just a description.
No – TRUE Reformation comes from within. By the 16th century – there were definitely some problems with Church hierarchy. There will ALWAYS be problems when humans are involved with anything.And they sought to reform the church by bringing it back from the corruption that caused the dark ages. And they had the Apostles and their writings to guide them.
Instead of trying to fix and reform those issues – men like Luther, Calvin, Zwingili, etc. began to pervert doctrine as well and separated themselves from the Church.
There absolutely WAS a centralized Church headquartered in Rome – established by Peter and Paul.there was no centralized church like we understand it. If there was one it would have been all the churches Paul planted and nurtured.
This is attested to by the Early Church Fathers. Men like Irenaeus, Dionysius of Corinth, Tertullian, Lactantius and many others.
Either you’re OUT of your mind – or you’re just really ignorant. I’ll tale that latter and give you the benefit of the doubt . . .The Roman Catholic Church historically forbade the reading of the Bible in one's native languageduring certain periods.The Council of Toulouse (1229) and Council of Trent (1546) issued prohibitions against the laity possessing vernacular translations of the Bible, citing concerns over heresy and the potential for corrupt
They were not heretical nor flawed any more than the vulgate was. they were translations form the most part by church doctors.
There were errors in pronouns, errors in language translation, errors in Parables and incidents, etc. One version had the Commandment listed as: “Thou shalt commit adultery".
This led to doctrinal issues, confusing messages, etc.
The Church finally put an end to this at the Council of Toulouse in the 12th century.
If by “Romanism”, you mean, the Catholic Church – explain which Sacred Traditions “contradict” the Scriptures.And if the "sacred tradition" as romanism calls it, contradicts the written word of God, it is to be rejected and resisted at all costs.
By the way – the Canon of Scripture is a Sacred Tradition because the list of Books that belong in the Bible are NOT listed in the Bible . . .
Last edited:

