Who was the New Testament written by?The creeds were written by men, not be God.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Who was the New Testament written by?The creeds were written by men, not be God.
LOLLet's get some scholarly input on what it means to be "manifested in the flesh"
View attachment 74663
View attachment 74664
It depends on the definition of the word "Christian". And on what the label is supposed to tell others about the individual. I also find it quite confusing when somebody with the label Christian starts to talk that Jesus is not God etc.
For the safety of newcomers, who come to learn about Christianity, the label is dangerous if used by some sectarian. As I noticed here that Jehovah Witnesses do and hide their true background, even evading direct questions about it. New people could get trapped into some cult this way.
Yes sir.The red text, composed from the Nicene and Athanasian creeds (I guess), is of course not a direct/explicit quote from the Bible.
The above is not for me...but I gave you two within the past hour.The whole reason trinitarians must resort to such rationalizations is precisely because there is not a trinity verse* in Scripture. Otherwise they'd just refer to it. We can rationalize what day Eve was created, which is different from simply quoting the verse that says Adam was created on Day 6.
I'm not here to PURSUADE you Wrangler.Trinitarians take it many steps further. Despite what Scripture says - and doesn't say on the matter - they invent this threat or rejection criteria (@GodsGrace used the term "allowed." Allow is the language of power, not persuasion.)
Again,,,I gave you two.You're not even a Christian if you don't embrace this rationalization of what day Eve was created. In fact, you are not even saved if you don't embrace this rationalization of what day Eve was created. The hellfires await you if you don't embrace this rationalization of what day Eve was created. It begs the question of why they are so doctrinally invested in their manmade rationalization? (It's because there is not a trinity verse among other reasons)
So are you saying that you're FREE to do whatever you want to do?Such a sentiment is not in Scripture. In fact, it goes against the sentiment in Scripture; 2 Corinthians 3:17 where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
GOD said He was called I AM.This affirms what an old Pastor observed in a video when he finally came to reject the trinity; the trinity does not produce the fruit of the spirit. They really have no answer to the observation that everyone uses the phrase "I am" - it doesn't make them God and was never a claim of deity. (They merely move the goal post, others thought as they do. It reminds me other Mother's question. If others jumped off a bridge, would you?)
Actually, those WITH JESUS at the time DID believe He was saying that He is God:God himself did not use that term to indicate he is God.
Jesus said HE WAS THE I AM.Rather he used a phrase the VOICE translation succinctly renders "eternal," as his unique and defining characteristic. The Hebrew term strictly translated is cumbersome, "was, am and am becoming." Jesus never applied this cumbersome expression to himself.
Jesus was 100% manEternal is a great translation and certainly does not apply to Jesus, who we know was a man who was born and died - like any other man. Death indicates the precise opposite of being eternal.
Here is what idolatry looks like Wrangler:It's almost as if trinitarians start with their conclusion and rationalize it at every turn. What would IDOLATRY look like again? Why would Christ followers teach what Jesus did not?
Unfortunately for you, the NT was written by others...* To be clear, when I write that the trinity is not found anywhere in Scripture, I mean that neither the word nor the concept of the trinity is explicitly in the Bible. To avoid the inevitable Appeal to Strawman, there simply is no verse that reads something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever. If there were such a verse, it would be the most quoted verse in Scripture by those who claim one’s salvation depends on believing it. The concept of the trinity is so important that in 66 books, it is not mentioned once!
I do not think that using Hebrew terms is useful or clarifying, outside of the ancient Hebrew culture.The WORD/Jesus is Elohim, His FATHER is Elohim, the Holy Spirit is Elohim
Odd mystical separation of the person who was born 2,000 years ago (capitalization not required as ‘person’ is a common noun).Jesus is the name of a Person who was born 2 thousand years ago.
WHO this Person is was understood by the Apostles
Lots of humility in that post.I'm here to instruct you as to the meaning of the word CHRISTIAN.
Not even God can raise himself from the dead. This is because God cannot die.Can a person that is not God raise themselves from the dead?
Read the gospel of John, even the very first chapter is clearly a witness that Jesus is God, the Logos in flesh. In the next chapters you can read that He came from heaven etc.Each Gospel emphatically proclaims who this person is, God’s anointed. Nothing more. Nothing less.
False. I already explained this. Dig into the actual words, you will find God said he is eternal, cumbersomely expressed as more than “I am” but “I was, am and am becoming.”GOD said He was called I AM.
EXodus 3
a.) God created all things for His gloryI do not think that using Hebrew terms is useful or clarifying, outside of the ancient Hebrew culture.
That is probably why the New Testament never uses them. These terms are also never used in Christian creeds.
Exactly! John states his purpose at 20:31 is for us to know Jesus is the Christ. Not God incarnate. Read that.Read the gospel of John
Agreed. This is the line of demarcation. Trinitarians wand to limit what it means to be a Christian to equal being a trinitarian. They call it orthodoxy.It is YOU that is not following orthodox Christianity.
while it is true that the GODHEAD can be a bit complex to understand in the beginning .Great point !
What could be plainer than when John states that THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS GOD. John 1:1
I really don't know why ANY other scripture is needed when it is finished off with John 1:14
AND THE WORD BECAME FLESH.
And some want to state that the Trinity was "invented" after hundreds of years.
Some persons claim to believe the words in the NT....
but it would seem that they do not.
In order to be defined as Christian, you must believe what CHRISTIANS believe.
Immanuel = God with usExactly! John states his purpose at 20:31 is for us to know Jesus is the Christ. Not God incarnate. Read that.
Stop extreme eisegesis for prologue to mean other than what John stated his purpose to be.
John has more verses than 20:31. Why do you want to ignore the rest? Yes, Jesus is Christ, but this is not all John ever wrote about Him.Exactly! John states his purpose at 20:31 is for us to know Jesus is the Christ. Not God incarnate. Read that.
Stop extreme eisegesis for prologue to mean other than what John stated his purpose to be.
Are you saying Ben Franklin wasn't Christian?Jesus being just a man is not a Christian idea
Lots of questions asked my friend . GOOD .Which Christians?
Orthodoxy….The Roman Catholic Church was into orthodoxy and they persecuted, tortured, and murdered in that pursuit. Belief control and promoting prescribed beliefs.
Now with over 30,000 Protestant denominations the term orthodoxy has lost it meaning.
Orthodoxy has always been wrong thinking. Better to know the truth rather than a popular belief or belief prescribed by men. And one of the greatest enemies of truth is false beliefs.
How many believe in the 3 in 1 formula for the Trinity, which is false?
How many people believe that the ten summaries in chapter 20 of Exodus are the Ten Commandments when the Ten Commandments are in chapter 34 of Exodus.
How many believe the Ten Commandments and the Mosaic Law pertain to Christians?
How many believe in the doctrine of Original Sin?
How many believe that Baptism is just for show?
How many believe that the Bread and Wine ritual is optional for Christians? Or that it is not a miracle in itself.
How many believe that charity and Good Deeds are optional for Christians?
How many people believe the scriptures say you have to have a wedding ceremony to be married?
How many people believe that polygamy and concubinage and slavery was ended by the scriptures?
Polygamy and concubinage and slavery was ended much later and it was the Protestants that made a church wedding a requirement to be married. All good stuff.
How many support the second rate status of women?
How many believe that sex married or not is dirty, nasty, and sinful?
False beliefs are powerful and they have been around for a long time and can corrupt how you understand the scriptures. Best to seek the truth.
For example on the beliefs that the Trinity is 3 in 1 or that it is a Godhead of 3 Gods. I don’t care. If the scriptures supported the 3 in 1 formula I would agree but there are over a hundred scriptures that prove that there are 3 Gods by name. Very few beliefs have that much support by the scriptures. And the 3 in 1 formula skews the meaning of so many scriptures.
And if Yahweh would have said...Yeshua and I created the heavens and earth I would agree. But the whole rewriting history thing....no.
The Gnostics really had no use for Yahweh and contributed every thing to Yeshua. I am not Gnostic.
please read post 535Immanuel = God with us