EXACTLY the point made by JESUS in John 8:44
JESUS is always directing us back to Genesis
There is no Apollyon in Genesis
The Serpent is in Genesis and he is identified by JESUS in the Gospel as Satan and in Revelation 20:1-3
All fallen angels and demons are liars, thieves that have come to ensare, kill and destroy.
IMO = Apollyon is a specific angel with a specific task in Revelation ch9
i have searched the scriptures in my mind/knowledge base of 40 years and i will also give more study in the scriptures on this.
After prayer and study and prayer, if the Holy Spirit quickens me to Apollyon being Satan, i will come back to you and say = Thank You Brother
i wish all brothers/sisters in Christ would do the same
Revelation 9:11:
“had a king over them, which is the angel of the abyss [Gr. abussos], whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.”
In piecing the apocalyptic jigsaw together we find that this dark spiritual dungeon currently has a king over it. This gives us insight into the fact that the abyss must be speaking of a kingdom. Moreover, that kingdom is imprisoned in its own darkness. The fact that there is
a king currently ruling tells us that the abyss must contain
a kingdom. The word kingdom means ‘king with a domain’. Its meaning includes the territory and the people over whom the King rules and exercises sovereign authority. The term also includes the legislation and laws that administrate that kingdom. The word employed in the New Testament for ‘kingdom’ is the Greek word
basileia denoting ‘sovereignty, royal power, kingship and dominion’. A kingdom must therefore have (1) a king – a head, (2) a domain to rule over – subjects and territory, (3) a structure of administration – ethics, rules and laws which govern it.
We all know, there are only two spiritual realms in conflict on this earth – the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness. Whilst these two kingdoms manifest through physical individuals they are invisible empires. The kingdom being described which “the destroyer” rules over is assuredly not the kingdom of God. The elect angels are never located in the abyss but rather in heavenly splendour. Therefore, we must be speaking of the dark restrained invisible spiritual realm of the devil’s kingdom.
Who is this king (or destroyer) that
currently reigns over “the bottomless pit” or abyss? We know from the description given of this king that we are looking at an angel. In fact, the king is called:
“the angel of the abyss.” There is no doubt that Abaddon / Apollyon are referring to someone within the demonic realm. This begs an instant question, who is the king that rules over that dark realm?
Strong’s Concordance gives us help, describing Apollyon (623) as “a destroyer (i.e. Satan).” Moreover, when we examine the root Greek word
apollumi (Strong’s 622) we find it means “to destroy fully (reflexively, to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively.” The word is variously translated destroy, die, lose, mar, perish in the King James Version. There seems little doubt that
Apollyon is referring to the devil. Time after time in Scripture we see Satan being described in such a destructive way. The name and characteristics of this being seem to identify him with that great enemy of the Church – the devil.
Revelation 9:1-3 shows the abyss occupied now by Satan's minions prior to the last trumpet. It also shows Satan (Abaddon/Apollyon) there as well. Remember Abaddon/Apollyon is a king. This king is obviously head over a kingdom (that is what king’s rule over) so what kingdom or domain and subjects and territory does he rule over? This is no natural king but a spiritual king. If it is a spiritual king it must either be Christ or Satan – the only two rulers over the two conflicting spiritual kingdoms. We know that Christ is not on earth since His ascent and definitely not in the abyss. There can surely be no doubt that this is Satan.
Strong’s Concordance gives us help, describing Apollyon (623) as “a destroyer (i.e. Satan).” Moreover, when we examine the root Greek word
apollumi (Strong’s 622) we find it means “to destroy fully (reflexively, to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively.” The word is variously translated destroy, die, lose, mar, perish in the King James Version. There seems little doubt that
Apollyon is referring to the devil. Time after time in Scripture we see Satan being described in such a destructive way. The name and characteristics of this being seem to identify him with that great enemy of the Church – the devil.
The New Testament employs the Greek root word for
apollyon to describe the works of Satan the destroyer. 1Corinthians 10:9-10 says,
“Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed [Gr. apollumi]
of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed [Gr.
apollumi]
of the destroyer
[Gr.
olothreutēs a ruiner]
.”
The same word is also used in John 10:10, in the familiar passage where Christ exposes the nature and aims of devil, saying,
“The thief (Satan) cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy [Gr. apollumi].”
Any where we see Satan mentioned or find him described, his nature is always to destroy. That is why his name is the same in every language (Greek and Hebrew included).
1 Peter 5:8 says that he is
“your adversary” and that he appears
“as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” Jesus said in John 8:44 that
“He was a murderer from the beginning.” Ezekiel 28:14-19 declares of him that merchandise has
“filled the midst of thee with violence” and that he is
“a terror” to all peoples.
We cannot help but conclude, the angel (or star) that descends in Revelation 9:1-3 is given immediate authority over Satan (
Abaddon / Apollyon) and his angels (symbolic represented in this passage as locust/scorpion-type creatures), who in turn are presently in the abyss realm. The one major difficulty for Premils here is that this passage expressly locates Satan and his minions in the abyss prior to the Coming of the Lord, as Amillennialism believes and not after that as Premillennialism mistakenly argues.