See post no. 881More dishonesty..
Changing the context of the discussion again.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
See post no. 881More dishonesty..
Changing the context of the discussion again.
Completely false.Just want everyone reading along to know that we get JUDGED at the time of our death.
If universalism is correct
JUDGEMENT IS NOT NECESSARY since we will all be saved.
See post no. 881What you said was:
GodsGrace:
God's word creates.
NOT the spoken word.
You conveniently removed "NOT the spoken word." after you were proven wrong.
More dishonesty on your part.
I stand by what I said.But that's not what you said is it?
Here's what you said:
GodsGrace:
:Sir,,,there are conditions to being saved.
Conditions you most probably do not accept."
I'm starting to think you're a dishonest person.
Hmmm.And a few paragraphs later you say:
Perhaps if you are honest moving forward "some new Christian reading along" might actually believe you.
Since you like to keep your belief system, which is most probably not biblical,Completely false.
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment. (Heb 9:27)
The fact is, we must all die and be judged. Either now in this age or later in the age to follow.
If you POST the scriptures you've MENTIONED,Greetings again GodsGrace,
I apply your definition "Begotten: To come forth from,,,To be generated from,,, (biblical language)" to the narrative of Matthew 1:20-21 and Luke 1:34-35. So I do not know what you are suggesting by your next comments:
I do believe I agree with that.Matthew 1:20-21 and Luke 1:34-35 describe the begettal of the human Jesus, the Son of God because God the Father is the father and the son of Mary as his mother. This describes how Jesus came forth and was generated.
That's when the word Christian was first used.The word "Christian" first occurs in Acts 11:26 and is applied to the warm fellowship of the Jews and Gentiles of Antioch, who shared the teaching of Barnabas and Paul.
Kind regards
Trevor
But many Trinitarians do not apply "only begotten of the Father" to this narrative.I do believe I agree with that.
No.But do you agree that the 2nd Person of the Trinity existed BEFORE that Person was generated in the way you describe?
Yes, Stephen saw a vision of Jesus similar to the prophecy of Psalm 110:1 which teaches that Jesus was invited to sit at the right hand of God in God the Father's Throne Revelation 3:20-21.Why was stephen stoned?
This was done when Stephen cried out to his accusers:
BEHOLD, I SEE THE HEAVENS OPENED UP AND THE SON OF MAN STANDING AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD.
Then you believe that the 2nd Person of the Trinity was created.Greetings again GodsGrace,
But many Trinitarians do not apply "only begotten of the Father" to this narrative.
No.
Actually THE SON OF MAN is referring to:Yes, Stephen saw a vision of Jesus similar to the prophecy of Psalm 110:1 which teaches that Jesus was invited to sit at the right hand of God in God the Father's Throne Revelation 3:20-21.
Kind regards
Trevor
The original quote is from Psalm 2, which Paul also quotes in the synagogue in Antioch Pisidia to show that Jesus is the Son of God (Acts 13:33).I wouldn't attempt to use Hebrews to show anything except that JESUS IS GOD.
LOLThe original quote is from Psalm 2, which Paul also quotes in the synagogue in Antioch Pisidia to show that Jesus is the Son of God (Acts 13:33).
I guess poetry is good for doctrine after all.
There is no such entity. You are using your man made definition of Christian.Then you believe that the 2nd Person of the Trinity was created.
That is not a Christian belief.
He was a unique man, the Son of God by birth, character and resurrection.Who was Jesus anyway? Was He just a man?
Yes, at his conception and birth. He was begotten of the Father.Did He come into existance at His birth as Jesus?
The LOGOS are the thoughts, plans, purpose of God that came into fruition when the only begotten of God was conceived, born, grew and ministered and John the Apostle beheld his moral glory, he was full of grace and truth.Then WHAT became flesh in John 1:14 which is referring to John 1:1?
The Son of Man goes back firstly to Psalm 8:4-6, Psalm 80:17, the descendant of Adam who was also begotten by God, the firstborn of the New Creation, in whom God's Logos, plan and purpose in creation has been and will be fulfilled.Actually THE SON OF MAN is referring to: Daniel 7:13-14
How about if someone believes the Son was "begotten of the Father, not created"? (The language comes directly from the Nicene creed.)Then you believe that the 2nd Person of the Trinity was created.
That is not a Christian belief.
I believe Jesus Christ was more than a unique man. I do believe he is God just not God the Father.He was a unique man, the Son of God by birth, character and resurrection.
Here's the problem Trevor....Greetings again GodsGrace,
There is no such entity. You are using your man made definition of Christian.
No sir. NOT by birth.
He was a unique man, the Son of God by birth, character and resurrection.
The Son of God always existed.
Yes, at his conception and birth. He was begotten of the Father.
So did God NOT have His thoughts, plans, purpose UNTIL the Son was born?
The LOGOS are the thoughts, plans, purpose of God that came into fruition when the only begotten of God was conceived, born, grew and ministered and John the Apostle beheld his moral glory, he was full of grace and truth.
In Psalm 8:4 the son of man means literally mankind.
The Son of Man goes back firstly to Psalm 8:4-6,
It is referring to David's son or Israel as a community but is also a prophetic reference to Jesus.Psalm 80:17,
Adam was not begotten.the descendant of Adam who was also begotten by God, the firstborn of the New Creation, in whom God's Logos, plan and purpose in creation has been and will be fulfilled.
Kind regards
Trevor
The Trinity is not the teaching of Barnabas and Paul. Again, what you have posted is your estimate of the Trinity. Most of what you state could be easily answered if I wanted to spend the time and effort, but I have mentioned sufficient.Here's the problem Trevor....
You claim to be Christian but do not adhere to Christian beliefs.
Then where does the doctrine come from if not the revealed word of God through the prophets?See. It's the other way around.
The doctrine comes first...
God made man in his own image..
Adam was not begotten.
Adam was created.
Adam was never a PART OF GOD that was generated at some point.
Man was made in the image of God.God made man in his own image.
Jesus Christ is the second Adam and the image of God.
Jesus Christ is the image of God, and you think that he is God, but he is the image of God made by God.