covenantee
Well-Known Member
The Jews themselves describe the destruction of the food as a "mad act", recognizing the entirely predictable outcome not of a revolt, but of the wholesale of destruction of Jews by Jews.Sure, I can explain that. First off, the food in your example was destroyed so the people would revolt against the Romans. They were not acting with the Romans. The Jews were trying to save their Temple and city.
Notwithstanding that, they, with the Romans, were the divinely orchestrated agents of Messiah the Prince to bring judgment and destruction upon the city, sanctuary, and apostate people of Jerusalem and Judaea.
Yes, let's. When do you plan to start?Now let's get to the truth.
The prince was Messiah the Prince, and the Romans and Jews were His people to accomplish His purposes of the judgment and destruction upon Jerusalem and Judaea.Your definition of the destruction of Jerusalem excludes the destruction of the city and the sanctuary, while the Word of God says that the people of the prince that shall come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.
Last edited: