Could Ezekiel 37, 38 and 39 all be post millennial?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,856
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Break [Psalm 2:9 H7489 ra'a] /
Smite [Revelation 19:15 G3960 patasso]

the nations.

Rule / shepherd [Revelation 19:15 G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron.

Matthew 2
6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, art not the least among the princes of Judah: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] my people Israel.

Revelation 7
17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed [G4165 poimaino] them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.

Revelation 2
26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27 And he shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.

Revelation 19:15
(a) And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that WITH IT (with the sharp sword proceeding from His mouth) he should SMITE the nations:

(b) and he shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron:

(c) and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

Your argument is a logical fallacy. You really should stop using that argument IMO - especially because you always mention that all authority in heaven and on earth has already been placed in Christ's hands.

@Hiddenthings is correct about the meaning of the above.
Your argument is extremely weak because you are ignoring details in the text. We're talking about what will happen when Jesus returns. Hiddenthings has no spiritual discernment whatsoever and this proves it even more. He denies the deity of Christ and He denies what Christ will do when He returns. Like him, you are completely ignoring the descriptions of COMPLETE DESTRUCTION being associated with His rod of iron. Can you tell me why you are ignoring that aspect of Christ's rod of iron? Yes, He uses it to shepherd His people, but it is associated with breaking/destroying those who are not His people. Do you not think Jesus smiting the nations/heathen and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God is not a description of Him destroying them? How can He rule over them the way Premils falsely think He will after having destroyed them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Your argument is extremely weak because you are ignoring details in the text. We're talking about what will happen when Jesus returns. Hiddenthings has no spiritual discernment whatsoever and this proves it even more. He denies the deity of Christ and He denies what Christ will do when He returns. Like him, you are completely ignoring the descriptions of COMPLETE DESTRUCTION being associated with His rod of iron. Can you tell me why you are ignoring that aspect of Christ's rod of iron? Yes, He uses it to shepherd His people, but it is associated with breaking/destroying those who are not His people. Do you not think Jesus smiting the nations/heathen and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God is not a description of Him destroying them? How can He rule over them the way Premils falsely think He will after having destroyed them?

Are you saying that shepherding the nations who believe in Him is not what Christ has been doing these last 2,000 years? You are the one who associates Christ's rule over the nations in Revelation 2:26-27 - and the fact that all authority in heaven and on earth has been placed in His hands - with the millennium of Revelation 20.

Now suddenly it does not suit you to say the same things anymore. Why?
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,856
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Are you saying that shepherding the nations who believe in Him is not what Christ has been doing these last 2,000 years? You are the one who associates Christ's rule over the nations in Revelation 2:26-27 - and the fact that all authority in heaven and on earth has been placed in His hands - with the millennium of Revelation 20.

Now suddenly it does not suit you to say the same things anymore. Why?
What are you talking about? Of course I believe Jesus has been reigning since His resurrection, but I'm talking about what happens when He returns, as described in Revelation 19. Him ruling the nations (heathen) is described there in conjunction with Him smiting them and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. So, that is a reference to Psalm 2:9 which describes Him as breaking/destroying the heathen, which He will do when He returns. As many other scriptures indicate as well. What is hard to understand about this?
 

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Of course I believe Jesus has been reigning since His resurrection, but I'm talking about what happens when He returns, as described in Revelation 19.


There are two words used in Revelation 19:15:

1. Smite: Agent: Sharp sword proceeding from the mouth of Christ.
2. Shepherd: Object: The nations.

I know you want me to ignore the second word and what it implies when the same word is used in Matthew 2:6 and Revelation 7:17

- but I don't see why I should ignore it, so I won't ignore it.

You can continue to ignore the above if you like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hiddenthings

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,856
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
So, you just ignore the reference to Jesus treading the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God in that verse? Do you ignore the verses which immediately follow that describe "all people, free and slave, great and small" being destroyed? How can you miss that? Don't you agree that all living unbelievers will be physically killed when Jesus returns? I'm pretty sure you have said that. So, with that being the case, why are you even arguing with me about this?

I know you want me to ignore the second word and what it implies when the same word is used in Matthew 2:6 and Revelation 7:17

- but I don't see why I should ignore it, so I won't ignore it.

You can continue to ignore the above if you like.
I don't ignore anything. Ever. You are not thinking about the fact that the word means something different in relation to a rod of iron than it normally means. Psalm 2:9 talks about Jesus BREAKING the heathen with His rod of iron. What does that mean to you? The word is related to destruction. You can, and I know you will, continue to ignore the fact that COMPLETE DESTRUCTION is described in Revelation 19:15.
 

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
So, you just ignore the reference to Jesus treading the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God in that verse? Do you ignore the verses which immediately follow that describe "all people, free and slave, great and small" being destroyed? How can you miss that? Don't you agree that all living unbelievers will be physically killed when Jesus returns? I'm pretty sure you have said that. So, with that being the case, why are you even arguing with me about this?


I don't ignore anything. Ever. You are not thinking about the fact that the word means something different in relation to a rod of iron than it normally means. Psalm 2:9 talks about Jesus BREAKING the heathen with His rod of iron. What does that mean to you? The word is related to destruction. You can, and I know you will, continue to ignore the fact that COMPLETE DESTRUCTION is described in Revelation 19:15.

So the Old Testament talks once about Jesus breaking the heathen with a rod of iron, and the Revelation talks more than once of Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron. So why do you likewise ignore the more than once that the Revelation talks about Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron?

Who are the nations of them which are saved who shall walk in the light of New Jerusalem, and the kings of the earth who will bring their glory and honor into it in Revelation 21:24?

Who is their Shepard?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Hiddenthings

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,856
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
So the Old Testament talks once about Jesus breaking the heathen with a rod of iron, and the Revelation talks more than once of Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron. So why do you likewise ignore the more than once that the Revelation talks about Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron?

Who are the nations of them which are saved who shall walk in the light of New Jerusalem, and the kings of the earth who will bring their glory and honor into it in Revelation 21:24?

Who is their Shepard?
It talks in Revelation 19:15 about Him ruling the nations/heathen with a rod of iron in conjunction with Him smiting them and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of God. How can you not see that as relating His rod of iron to destruction just as Psalm 2:9 does? Don't you agree with me that He will physically destroy all unbelievers when He returns? I thought for sure you agreed with me about that.
 

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
It talks in Revelation 19:15 about Him ruling the nations/heathen with a rod of iron in conjunction with Him smiting them and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of God. How can you not see that as relating His rod of iron to destruction just as Psalm 2:9 does? Don't you agree with me that He will physically destroy all unbelievers when He returns? I thought for sure you agreed with me about that.

I understand that you are saying that He will not shepherd the nations of believers with a rod of iron following His return because He smote the nations of unbelievers with a rod of iron at the time of His return.

It's a pity you weren't there to tell John not to use the word poimaino (shepherd) in Revelation 2, 12 & 19. John evidently needed your insight.

Revelation 2
26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27 And he shall rule [poimaino - shepherd] them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
28 And I will give him the morning star.
29 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

Revelation 12
5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule [poimaino - shepherd] all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

Aaah. Sheperding the nations with a rod of iron after Christ had been caught up to God and to His throne. Why would John even have written such a thing? He really needed you there.

Revelation 19
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it (with the sharp sword proceeding from His mouth) he should smite the nations: AND [G2532 kai] he shall rule [poimaino - shepherd] them with a rod of iron: AND [G2532 kai] he (is the one who) treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

John really needed you there. If you were there he certainly wouldn't have written:

Revelation 3
21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
22 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

.. but John did not have you there. He only had Jesus there - who had once told His apostles:

Matthew 19:28-29
28 Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

It's only the nations that are saved that Revelation 21 says will be entering New Jerusalem - but you say they will have no shepherd because the rod of iron He might have shepherded them with was used by Him to smite the unbelieving nations.

I understand what you are saying. I just don't agree with it. IMO there is a reason why John used the word "sword", speaking of it as coming out of the mouth of Christ when he wrote about Christ smiting the nations, but did not use the word "break" as in Psalm 2:9 when He spoke of Christ ruling the nations - instead he spoke of Christ shepherding the nations with a rod of iron, unlike the Psalmist.

But John did not have you there to correct his Greek, so it's understandable.
 
Last edited:

ewq1938

Mod
Staff member
Jul 11, 2015
8,494
1,698
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male

There are two words used in Revelation 19:15:

1. Smite: Agent: Sharp sword proceeding from the mouth of Christ.
2. Shepherd: Object: The nations.

I know you want me to ignore the second word and what it implies when the same word is used in Matthew 2:6 and Revelation 7:17

- but I don't see why I should ignore it, so I won't ignore it.

You can continue to ignore the above if you like.

Also, RULE in Rev 19 is future tense so the ruling doesn't even take place until AFTER Armageddon which proves mortals are alive and ruled over by Christ after the second coming:

Rev 19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite (Aorist tense verb with PRESENT tense meaning) the nations: and he shall rule (FUTURE tense verb) them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth (PRESENT tense verb) the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

https://www.blueletterbible .org/kjv/rev/19/15/t_conc_1186015

https://biblehub .com/interlinear/revelation/19-15.htm

(remove the spaces before .com and .org in the two links)


Here rule/poimaino is in the FUTURE tense meaning it will happen at some point AFTER the second coming and battle of Armageddon while treadeth/pateo is written in the PRESENT tense meaning it is happening during this second coming. The treading and smiting are happening at Armageddon but not the ruling which proves some mortals will be alive after Armageddon is over. This proves the Premill position because indeed there is a future rule of people who were not slain during the second coming that Christ and his saints will rule over.

A second witness to this:

Rev 2:25 But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.

That is the second coming. Everything we read of next comes after the second coming:

Rev 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

After "the end" comes, there is given power over the nations to those that are overcomers. They will be given power over the mortal unsaved nations after Christ has returned not before it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zao is life

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Also, RULE in Rev 19 is future tense so the ruling doesn't even take place until AFTER Armageddon which proves mortals are alive and ruled over by Christ after the second coming:

Rev 19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite (Aorist tense verb with PRESENT tense meaning) the nations: and he shall rule (FUTURE tense verb) them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth (PRESENT tense verb) the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

https://www.blueletterbible .org/kjv/rev/19/15/t_conc_1186015

https://biblehub .com/interlinear/revelation/19-15.htm

(remove the spaces before .com and .org in the two links)


Here rule/poimaino is in the FUTURE tense meaning it will happen at some point AFTER the second coming and battle of Armageddon while treadeth/pateo is written in the PRESENT tense meaning it is happening during this second coming. The treading and smiting are happening at Armageddon but not the ruling which proves some mortals will be alive after Armageddon is over. This proves the Premill position because indeed there is a future rule of people who were not slain during the second coming that Christ and his saints will rule over.

A second witness to this:

Rev 2:25 But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.

That is the second coming. Everything we read of next comes after the second coming:

Rev 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

After "the end" comes, there is given power over the nations to those that are overcomers. They will be given power over the mortal unsaved nations after Christ has returned not before it.

Thank you. But John did not have any Amillennialist there to correct his Greek when he included tenses. I agree with everything you say except the mortals part. The nations who enter the New Jerusalem are the nations of those who are saved.

Immortals rebelled against the Word of God, believing they could not die - in the Garden of Eden when God allowed them to be tested by the father of lies contradicting the Word of God, telling them that they would not die.

John is writing about their descendants.

The first time Adam died. Jesus came and died for us, and rose again from the dead for us.

The last rebellion has this consequence:

Fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.

because they will be immortal and therefore they will believe that God cannot destroy anything He created, soul and body - by fire, and he cannot withdraw the spirit of life he breathed into them allowing them to live forever (be immortal). That's what they will believe, and most believe it now.
 

ewq1938

Mod
Staff member
Jul 11, 2015
8,494
1,698
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Thank you. But John did not have any Amillennialist there to correct his Greek when he included tenses. I agree with everything you say except the mortals part. The nations who enter the New Jerusalem are the nations of those who are saved.


Mortals enter the Millennium, not NJ. There are no mortals when NJ arrives.
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I'm not. At all. But, you seem very evasive.


How convenient for you to leave out verse 9. Are you just ignoring the part where it says He will break/destroy the heathen? Have you ever read Revelation 19:15-18? Does that look like a description of Jesus reigning over the heathen as you falsely think He will or does it describe Him destroying them? It pretty clearly describes Him as destroying them. Can you tell me why you ignore these details?
When dealing with the Lord you need to find the balance between goodness and severity. The Scripture is right and it waits for us to fall in line with its truth.
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I'm not. At all. But, you seem very evasive.
Might just be your manner?
How convenient for you to leave out verse 9.
Not intentionally! I wanted to show you that which you didnt know when I first asked if you had read Psalm 2. You recall your response?
Are you just ignoring the part where it says He will break/destroy the heathen?
No, he will do this but maybe not in the way you have communicated.
Have you ever read Revelation 19:15-18? Does that look like a description of Jesus reigning over the heathen as you falsely think He will or does it describe Him destroying them? It pretty clearly describes Him as destroying them. Can you tell me why you ignore these details?
The Nations are either an inheritance or they are not.

Again, it's about you finding the balance.
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Break [Psalm 2:9 H7489 ra'a] /
Smite [Revelation 19:15 G3960 patasso]

the nations.

Rule / shepherd [Revelation 19:15 G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron.

Matthew 2
6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, art not the least among the princes of Judah: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] my people Israel.

Revelation 7
17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed [G4165 poimaino] them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.

Revelation 2
26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27 And he shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.

Revelation 19:15
(a) And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that WITH IT (with the sharp sword proceeding from His mouth) he should SMITE the nations:

(b) and he shall rule / shepherd [G4165 poimaino] them with a rod of iron:

(c) and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

Your argument is a logical fallacy. You really should stop using that argument IMO - especially because you always mention that all authority in heaven and on earth has already been placed in Christ's hands.

@Hiddenthings is correct about the meaning of the above.
Have you considered the prophecy of Gen 49:10

Genesis 49:10 “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.”

The exercise of authority and rulership was one of the privileges of the firstborn and, under normal circumstances, would have belonged to Reuben. However, though he was Jacob’s natural firstborn, Reuben forfeited that position, and the right of rulership was ultimately transferred to Judah.

“Nor a lawgiver from between his feet” indicates that the Messiah would be both Prince and Lawgiver. In this latter role, he is described as being “like unto Moses” (Deut. 18:18–19). Prophecies concerning the law he will establish throughout the earth at his coming are found in Isaiah 2:2–4; 42:4; Malachi 4:4; and elsewhere. Anticipating this, Yahweh declared, “Judah is my lawgiver” (Ps. 60:7; 108:8).

Historically, this was not fully realized until the Lord proclaimed the principles of his “new commandments,” particularly in his foundational address outlining the standards of Kingdom citizenship (Matthew 5–7). Though grounded in the Law of Moses, his teaching elevated and fulfilled it to such an extent that it constituted a new and higher law (John 13:34).

This will form the basis of the law that shall go forth from Zion when the Kingdom is established. “Moses was a lawgiver, not of Judah, but of Levi; but when Shiloh comes as the lawgiver of Judah, then ‘the law shall go forth from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem’ (Isa. 2:3)”

The lawgiver is described as being “between the feet” of the one whom his brethren shall praise. This expression likely refers to the staff of office held upright before the dispenser of the law. The Revised Version renders “lawgiver” as “ruler’s staff,” and The New Old Testament as “leader’s staff.” The Hebrew term points to a dispenser of law, with the staff, symbol of his authority pictured as being “between the knees” of Shiloh, the Messiah.

These beautiful principles would have little practical purpose without mortal nations to guide, govern, and instruct.

It's the training now for the true Saints of Christ to live by righteousness so that Jeremiah 3:15 can be realised in the Kingdom age.
 

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Have you considered the prophecy of Gen 49:10

Genesis 49:10 “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.”

The exercise of authority and rulership was one of the privileges of the firstborn and, under normal circumstances, would have belonged to Reuben. However, though he was Jacob’s natural firstborn, Reuben forfeited that position, and the right of rulership was ultimately transferred to Judah.

“Nor a lawgiver from between his feet” indicates that the Messiah would be both Prince and Lawgiver. In this latter role, he is described as being “like unto Moses” (Deut. 18:18–19). Prophecies concerning the law he will establish throughout the earth at his coming are found in Isaiah 2:2–4; 42:4; Malachi 4:4; and elsewhere. Anticipating this, Yahweh declared, “Judah is my lawgiver” (Ps. 60:7; 108:8).

Historically, this was not fully realized until the Lord proclaimed the principles of his “new commandments,” particularly in his foundational address outlining the standards of Kingdom citizenship (Matthew 5–7). Though grounded in the Law of Moses, his teaching elevated and fulfilled it to such an extent that it constituted a new and higher law (John 13:34).

This will form the basis of the law that shall go forth from Zion when the Kingdom is established. “Moses was a lawgiver, not of Judah, but of Levi; but when Shiloh comes as the lawgiver of Judah, then ‘the law shall go forth from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem’ (Isa. 2:3)”

The lawgiver is described as being “between the feet” of the one whom his brethren shall praise. This expression likely refers to the staff of office held upright before the dispenser of the law. The Revised Version renders “lawgiver” as “ruler’s staff,” and The New Old Testament as “leader’s staff.” The Hebrew term points to a dispenser of law, with the staff, symbol of his authority pictured as being “between the knees” of Shiloh, the Messiah.

These beautiful principles would have little practical purpose without mortal nations to guide, govern, and instruct.

It's the training now for the true Saints of Christ to live by righteousness so that Jeremiah 3:15 can be realised in the Kingdom age.

For us the trouble with the law is that it brings forth death because it shows our sin (transgression of the law) and guilt up - and thereby shows us up for what we are - sinful and guilty. For us the law that is holy is a curse to us. That's why the Son of man who is the last Adam and Son of God who represents all mankind, stated that not one jot or tittle would pass from the law till all is fulfilled, and then went ahead and fulfilled the law Himself, paying the penalty due to us in the process, becoming a curse for us.

Remaining in Him, trusting in His righteousness and blood - which is the evidence before God that our debt is paid and we are justified in Him - is all that is left for us to do.

And He gave us one commandment. Not ten, not nine, not eight, not seven .. one commandment.

Your religious mindset has led you away from 100% reliance on the work of Christ and into believing that obedience to the law will not curse you because of your transgression of the law.
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
So the Old Testament talks once about Jesus breaking the heathen with a rod of iron, and the Revelation talks more than once of Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron. So why do you likewise ignore the more than once that the Revelation talks about Him shepherding the nations with a rod of iron?

Who are the nations of them which are saved who shall walk in the light of New Jerusalem, and the kings of the earth who will bring their glory and honor into it in Revelation 21:24?

Who is their Shepard?
We might not agree on everything Zao but we share a beautiful hope!
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
For us the trouble with the law is that it brings forth death because it shows our sin (transgression of the law) and guilt up - and thereby shows us up for what we are - sinful and guilty.
My comments were in relation to the Law of Liberty...sorry if I didn't make that clear. I think I referenced the New Commandments to which that Law speaks.
 

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,863
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
My comments were in relation to the Law of Liberty...sorry if I didn't make that clear. I think I referenced the New Commandments to which that Law speaks.
The word commandments is plural.

Jesus gave one new commandment.

John reminded us of what it is, beginning with the words "This is His commandment .."
 
  • Like
Reactions: ewq1938