My answer: Your hostility and unchristlike behavior isn’t warranted. It is quite possible to disagree and still be gentlemanly about it.
It's also quite possible to disagree regarding any idea being added to scripture while refraining from the unChristlike behavior of implying that someone - in this case myself (for example) -
said that the days of great tribulation mentioned in Matthew 24:21-22 will be "shortened to 3.5 years for the elect's sake".
You ought not to claim those you are talking to said things that they did not say. It's unChristlike.
1.
Scripture says the beast will reign for 42 months (Rev 13:5).
2.
Scripture says the beast
will make war against the saints and will overcome them (Rev 13:7).
3.
Scripture says that the beast
will open his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven (Rev 13:6).
4.
Jesus said that when the gospel has been preached in all the world as a witness to all nations, the end will come,
and His followers will be handed over to tribulation and killed, being hated of all nations for His name's sake. (Matt 24:9-14).
5.
Jesus said that when His followers see - standing
in the holy place - "the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet" then those who are in Judea should flee to the mountains, and
- using the same language used by Luke in Luke 17:26-37 regarding the end of the age and return of Christ - He also said things like
"Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house" (Matt 24:17), and
"two will be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left" (Matt 24:40), etc.
Therefore:
IF that period is speaking about something that will take place
during the same 42 month reign of the beast mentioned in Rev 13, then obviously
for the elect's sake those days of
their great tribulation will be shortened - but Jesus
did not say "by how much" those days will be shortened (and I never claimed He did).
6.
Paul said that
the Father "has set a day on which
He is going to judge the world in righteousness,
by a man whom he designated, having provided proof to everyone by raising him from the dead.".
7.
Jesus said that
the Father "has granted the Son authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man." (John 5:27), saying that
"a time is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and will come out - the ones who have done what is good to the resurrection resulting in life, and the ones who have done what is evil to the resurrection resulting in condemnation." (John 5:28-29).
8.
Jesus said that when He returns,
all nations will be gathered before Him for judgment, giving us a very clear picture of this (Matthew 25:41-46).
9.
John wrote that when the seventh trumpet sounded, he heard loud voices in heaven saying: "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he will reign for ever and ever",
and at the same time John saw the twenty-four elders who are seated on their thrones before God threw themselves down with their faces to the ground and worshiped God with these words:
"We give you thanks, Lord God, the All-Powerful, the one who is and who was, because you have taken your great power and begun to reign.
The nations were enraged, but your wrath has come, and the time has come for the dead to be judged, and the time has come to give to your servants, the prophets, their reward, as well as to the saints and to those who revere your name, both small and great, and the time has come to destroy those who destroy the earth."
10.
Paul taught that
"we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad." (2 Cor 5:10; Romans 14:10).
There is NO indication in scripture that God will judge anyone by anyone except by Jesus (God the Lamb).
-- All of which means and proves biblically that you have
added the idea you are expressing in this thread
to scripture, and want to convince us that scripture conforms to your addition.
Scripture DOES NOT conform to anyone's ideas that they add to scripture.
I’ve been studying Rev. for over 40 yrs. and believe it or not I have learned somethings and most folks that disagree just haven’t dug deep enough yet.
Just a little longer than me then - but the length of time you or me or anyone else has been studying scripture does not qualify anything you or I or anyone else says when what you say is easily proved to be your own idea which has been added to scripture
- and EVERYONE believes He has come to His understanding by the Holy Spirit - including ALL those who disagree with you.
No matter how long you have been studying scripture, you're a far way from being mature enough to KNOW to have the Christlike humility when you discuss scripture with anyone else that it is YOU who could be wrong about what you are saying and THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU who may be correct
- the very fact that you appeal to what you appeal to above proves that you do not have the HUMILITY which is a prerequisite to a proper understanding of God's Word
- which is why you fail to apply this below to yourself, instead appealing to how long you have been studying the subjects you are talking about, and appealing (as you did earlier) to the Holy Spirit:
The very fact that you decided to debate against what I said by claiming or implying that I said something I had not said, was already indicative of the above facts, and that you have not applied to yourself what you say below:
You are just as likely to be wrong as anyone else is. None of us have 100% of the truth, but combined we just might. However, it seems the church prefers to fight over the top shiny layers of prophecy w/o bothering to connect the dots to the prophetic narrative as a whole.
PS - ALL those who genuinely believe in Jesus
have the Holy Spirit - including ALL those who disagree with you.
So now I'm prepared to start over without the argument - if you will drop trying to put the blame on me for your own unChrislike behavior by making a post that instead of apologizing, shifts the blame for the argument you started, onto me.