MonoBiblical
Well-Known Member
I am a deist reactionary.But, the question was what does that have to do with what I said? You don't seem to be able to understand what people are saying for whatever reason.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am a deist reactionary.But, the question was what does that have to do with what I said? You don't seem to be able to understand what people are saying for whatever reason.
I was not familiar with that term, so I just did some quick research on it. You deny the deity of Jesus Christ and that the Bible is inspired by God? Do you deny that people can have a personal spiritual relationship with God?I am a deist reactionary.
I am a deist who believes in the bible, even with its errors. People do not have personal relationships with God. They might with the Devil by using drugs.I was not familiar with that term, so I just did some quick research on it. You deny the deity of Jesus Christ and that the Bible is inspired by God? Do you deny that people can have a personal spiritual relationship with God?
So, you think the Bible has errors and you deny that Jesus is God and that we can have a personal relationship with God. Where do your beliefs come from? Clearly not from the Bible since it teaches that Jesus is God and that we can have a personal spiritual relationship with Him by placing our faith in Him and believing that He died for our sins and rose again from the dead.I am a deist who believes in the bible, even with its errors. People do not have personal relationships with God. They might with the Devil by using drugs.
Renaissance Deism had similar beliefs, and I believe Jesus died above sins a.k.a. wrongs rather than for them.So, you deny that Jesus is God and that we can have a personal relationship with God. Where do your beliefs come from? Clearly not from the Bible since it teaches that Jesus is God and that we can have a personal spiritual relationship with Him by placing our faith in Him and believing that He died for our sins and rose again from the dead.
The Holy Spirit is not with us.
What does that mean?Renaissance Deism had similar beliefs, and I believe Jesus died above sins a.k.a. wrongs rather than for them.
He is either sanctimonious and over-sensitive, OR he's making it look like @Earburner was claiming that he alone has the teaching of the Holy Spirit - or that's what @Spiritual Israelite 's narcissistic-sounding post implies.
I didn't get that from @Earburner 's post - and no objective reader would. He was simply saying that it is the Holy Spirit who teaches in the New Testament how to interpret Daniel 9:26-27.
Some are just prone to falsely claiming others say what they did not say in order to make themselves "look" big. It's all very transparent. They often talk about other posters to one another, without copying the poster they are talking about in.
Not sure what you are doing in your reply to his post.
My spirit [was] led by my mind to react to your post.it was more of an ironic allusion to one of spiritual Israelites often used arguments I’ve come across. People often claim they are the ones truly lead by the spirit, and yet they argue with others claiming the spirit is truly leading them. In this case who does spirit truly lead in understanding between these 2 opposing frameworks?
It means noone is safe or rescued. Besides the passage is not afterlife related. You only think it is. I need to write a paper on this, really...What does that mean?
I want you to know something since you have obviously been deceived. The Bible teaches that you need to acknowledge that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God the Father raised Him from the dead in order to be saved.
Romans 10:8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith which we preach): 9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
If you do not do this, then you will end up in hell with God's wrath on you and when Jesus returns you will have to give an account of yourself to explain why you did not repent of your sins and put your faith in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior when you had the chance. So, do it today. Do it now. Today is the day and now is the time of salvation. Ask God to show you the truth so that you can know what He requires you to do before it's too late.
Great job of missing the reason why I questioned him. I never claim or imply that I'm the only one interpreting a passage correctly as he was doing by saying that no one agreed with what he believed the Holy Spirit showed him about the meaning of Daniel 9:24-27.it was more of an ironic allusion to one of spiritual Israelites often used arguments I’ve come across. People often claim they are the ones truly lead by the spirit, and yet they argue with others claiming the spirit is truly leading them. In this case who does spirit truly lead in understanding between these 2 opposing frameworks?
This is sad. Please ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7).It means noone is safe or rescued. Besides the passage is not afterlife related. You only think it is. I need to write a paper on this, really...
That would be overconfident.This is sad. Please ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7).
What does that mean? It's a good thing to ask God for wisdom. Do you not want wisdom? Or is James 1:5-7 one of those Bible passages that you think are in error?That would be overconfident.
Prayer solves nothing. Goodbye for now.What does that mean? It's a good thing to ask God for wisdom. Do you not want wisdom?
So, I guess the following verse is one of the verses that you think are in error since you clearly don't believe it is true.Prayer solves nothing. Goodbye for now.
Does someone or something solve something?Prayer solves nothing. Goodbye for now.
I'm not, But Lk. 21:21 is a stand-alone prophecy that doesn't line up w/ the other two gospel accounts.Luke 21:21 is fulfilled history. No amount of desperate denial can change that.
The question becomes based on which interpretation lines up w/ the 'whole" of prophecy and not just a couple of segments.it was more of an ironic allusion to one of spiritual Israelites often used arguments I’ve come across. People often claim they are the ones truly lead by the spirit, and yet they argue with others claiming the spirit is truly leading them. In this case who does spirit truly lead in understanding between these 2 opposing frameworks?
It lines up perfectly with fulfilled history, same as the other two Gospel accounts.I'm not, But Lk. 21:21 is a stand-alone prophecy that doesn't line up w/ the other two gospel accounts.
No one is saying it didn't happen but 70ad was the beginning of most end times prophecies not the end.It lines up perfectly with fulfilled history, same as the other two Gospel accounts.
The flight of the Judaean Christians.
There's no lining up better than that.