I agree. Let's give to the care of those in need directly as we have opportunity. In no way do we need fancy buildings to do this. Every individual can help those in need directly.
What do you have against our meeting in a building purchased for that use? What is wrong with several hundred of us gathering together? Why do you reject the idea that we can have a full time pastor who should have a nice house and medical insurance and good food? He works hard, he does well (total understatement), why shouldn't we support him and his family?
Do you think someone is being shortchanged because someone else is receiving our love? Do you realize the many good works we are accomplishing as a group that wouldn't happen if we were all collections of a dozen or so in a living room?
We wouldn't have built schools and orphanages in Africa. We would not be building homes for people in South America. We would not be sending out missionary teams throughout the world.
The previous pastor is currently living in a town on the edge of the Gobi desert in Mongolia, that has no Christian church, and no Christians when he went there. He's begun a house church with the converts, but this wouldn't happen without our financial base.
The property works well for VBS for the kids in summer. Afterward, the parents often start coming to church. We support Living Well and Love Life, who provide pregnant women alternatives to abortion.
I could go on and on and on.
Our pastor is an excellent Bible teacher, filled with the Spirit and with wisdom, and God has given opportunity for several hundred believers to be blessed with His good teaching.
I've been delivered from an evil by the prayers of our church.
I'm not saying we are not to have our personal ministry to others. I am saying that our church is a very good and vital place. And we do have a separate fund for property maintenance and building projects, so that we can give to that particular use if we wish, without having to use funds given for missions or outreach or what have you. We keep it separate so you can give as you wish for what use you wish. They actually have a number of accounts for this purpose.
When Jesus healed all who came to Him, the word for "multitudes" was used to describe the massive crowds. When the church at Antioch was spoken of, Luke wrote that Paul and others taught a "considerable multitude", that is, significantly larger crowds then came to Jesus.
There is nothing wrong with a large church, a small church, all are able to serve God's purpose. Maybe you've been burned by a church overly focused on money, I don't know. But in no wise does that define all churches.
Much love!