You did the same for my verses.
Not at all. You'll see that I did address most of your verses; I addressed everything that needed addressing.
And Yeshua even explained the oneness concept but no one listens, so there yea go.
But have you listened to Jesus, and if so, have you actually understood? You provided John 17:21-22, but there is much more context that needs to be understood, both within John and without. First, John 1:1-18, which clearly shows the eternal nature of the Son while yet remaining distinct from the Father. Second is Jesus's I Am statements, mainly in John 8, particularly 8:58, which clearly speaks to his eternal nature. Third are the many statements of Jesus speaking of his existence prior to coming to earth, not the least of which is in the very context of the verses you gave, in John 17:5, "And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed."
Then we have John 10:30:
Joh 10:30 I and the Father are one.”
That can only be speaking of unity of essence or substance, that is, sameness of nature. It cannot mean unity in mission or plan or will, otherwise the Jews would have claimed the same. It cannot mean unity of person, as "one" is neuter and Jesus is clearly making a distinction between he and the Father.
If there was three Gods in one it would have been so odd that the scriptures would have made it clear.
Why do you presume to believe such a thing? God used progressive revelation throughout the Bible, so why should he change that? It may not be explicitly mentioned, but it is definitely implied. The facts remain: there is only one God (always has been), yet the Son of God and the Holy Spirit are both spoken of in language that attributes deity to them and a oneness with God. Tritheism is absolutely ruled out as a possibility.
And I am sure you have read that Yahweh new when the end of time would occur and Yeshua did not. And Yahweh had authority that Yeshua did not And Yeshua sits on the right hand of Yahweh. And a fundamental belief that He is the Son of God, not the Son of Himself.....A three headed God? or they fell into a cosmic blender?
Again, your straw man that proves you don't even understand the doctrine of the Trinity. It begs the question as to why you argue so much against something you don't understand, even to the point of believing heresy.
As for as it the three in one formula being biblical ....
The McKenzie Bible Dictionary explains it this way.... “The Trinity of God is defined by the Church as the belief that in God there are three persons who subsist in one nature. The belief as so defined was reached only in the 4th and 5th centuries AD and hence is not explicitly or formally a biblical belief.” Which hold true to the fact that the word Trinity does not occur in the Holy Bible.
The reason it says 4th and 5th century is that the Catholic Church came up with this doctrine to silence the disagreements over God the Father and God the Son because Emperor Constantine insisted on one belief even if it was wrong. Then enforced it upon excommunication or death.
And yet the belief that Jesus was God, yet not the Father, while retaining the biblical foundation of monotheism, has been around much longer. Here is just one example, from Athenagoras's Plea for Christians (ca. 177 AD):
"CHAP. X.--THE CHRISTIANS WORSHIP THE FATHER, SON, AND HOLY GHOST.
That we are not atheists, therefore, seeing that we acknowledge one God, uncreated, eternal, invisible, impassible, incomprehensible, illimitable, who is apprehended by the understanding only and the reason, who is encompassed by light, and beauty, and spirit, and power ineffable, by whom the universe has been created through His Logos, and set in order, and is kept in being--I have sufficiently demonstrated. [I say "His Logos"], for we acknowledge also a Son of God. Nor let any one think it ridiculous that God should have a Son. For though the poets, in their fictions, represent the gods as no better than men, our mode of thinking is not the same as theirs, concerning either God the Father or the Son.
But the Son of God is the Logos of the Father, in idea and in operation; for after the pattern of Him and by Him were all things made, the Father and the Son being one. And, the Son being in the Father and the Father in the Son, in oneness and power of spirit, the understanding and reason (nous kai logos) of the Father is the Son of God. But if, in your surpassing intelligence, it occurs to you to inquire what is meant by the Son, I will state briefly that He is the first product of the Father, not as having been brought into existence (for from the beginning, God, who is the eternal mind [
nous], had the Logos in Himself, being from eternity instinct with Logos [
logikos]; but inasmuch as He came forth to be the idea and energizing power of all material things, which lay like a nature without attributes, and an inactive earth, the grosser particles being mixed up with the lighter. The prophetic Spirit also agrees with our statements. "The Lord," it says, "made me, the beginning of His ways to His works."
The Holy Spirit Himself also, which operates in the prophets, we assert to be an effluence of God, flowing from Him, and returning back again like a beam of the sun. Who, then, would not be astonished to hear men who speak of God the Father, and of God the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and who declare both their power in union and their distinction in order, called atheists? Nor is our teaching in what relates to the divine nature confined to these points; but we recognise also a multitude of angels and ministers, whom God the Maker and Framer of the world distributed and ap pointed to their several posts by His Logos, to occupy themselves about the elements, and the heavens, and the world, and the things in it, and the goodly ordering of them all."
Athenagoras of Athens: A Plea for the Christians
And of course the Apostles referred to Yahweh as God and Yeshua as Lord.
Yes, but they also referred to Jesus as God:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Joh 1:2 He was in the beginning with God.
Joh 1:3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
...
Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him.
Joh 20:28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!”
Rom 9:5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.
Heb 1:10 And, “You, Lord, laid the foundation of the earth in the beginning, and the heavens are the work of your hands;
Heb 1:11 they will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment,
Heb 1:12 like a robe you will roll them up, like a garment they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will have no end.”
2Pe 1:1 Simeon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ:
And that would be because Jesus strongly implied he was God.
As it stands it is one of the longest and most popular false beliefs.
You haven't proven it false, not even close. All you have shown is that you don't even understand what you argue against. But an actual false belief, a heresy, that has been around significantly longer is polytheism, which obviously includes tritheism.
