I read parts 1 and 2, but am going to stop there for now, because as much as you said that is correct--and much is--there are a few things somewhat against what is actually true:
The singular false messiah:
The reason there would seem to be both many and also a singular description, is that likeness to the real Messiah, which is singular, but includes many in Him as one man. That issue was addressed as "For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ" (1 Corinthians 12:12), and "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive" (1 Corinthians 15:22).
Now that's some fancy word juggling using irrelevant Scripture. The idea of a singular "antichrist" AND the "many antichrists" is from 1 John 2:18. It's simple. John said as the disciples had already heard... that "antichrist" (singular) shall come, that even now there were "many antichrists". That's TWO objects, not one. What I stated from Scripture is accurate.
The "future" coming:
The only reason to form a "future" doctrine, is unlike Christ who we have seen and read of as One and also many--is we have not seen "the man of sin" yet fully revealed.
Just more word juggling without real meaning.
Any prophecy given that has still yet come to pass means it is for sometime in the 'future'. It has nothing to do with any crazy, stupid idea like a "future" doctrine. That's idiotic.
Last edited: