You seem to make it up as you go - all according to your own theology.
There's no consistency to your theology. You chop and change, to justify what you believe. I will put your beliefs to the test:
2 Peter 3:3-13 couldn't be clear
er: “Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming [Gr. parousia]? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.”
- Do you believe that "the heavens shall pass away with a great noise" literally when He returns as a thief as the Bible says (2 Peter 3:10)?
- Do you believe that "the elements shall melt with fervent heat" literally when He returns as a thief as the Bible says (2 Peter 3:10 & 12)?
- Do you believe that "the earth also ... shall be burned up" literally when He returns as a thief as the Bible says (2 Peter 3:10)?
- Do you believe that "the works that are therein [the earth] shall be burned up" literally when He returns as a thief as the Bible says (2 Peter 3:10)?
It's not that I want the fire or need the fire to be literal in the LOF. I would hope it isn't literal. Except fire is used way too many times to describe this place to not take it in the literal sense.
Matthew 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down,
and cast into the fire.
Matthew 13:40 As therefore the tares are gathered and
burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
Matthew 13:42 And shall
cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Matthew 13:50 And shall
cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Matthew 18:8 Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet
to be cast into everlasting fire.
Matthew 18:9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes
to be cast into hell fire.
Luke 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for
I am tormented in this flame
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was
cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in
the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Take Matthew 13:42, for instance. Anyone familiar with the book of Daniel would be thinking the following.
Daniel 3:19 ¶Then was Nebuchadnezzar full of fury, and the form of his visage was changed against Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego: therefore he spake, and commanded that they should heat the furnace one seven times more than it was wont to be heated.
Was that furnace of fire literal? Of course it was. The following undeniably proves it.
Daniel 3:22 Therefore because the king's commandment was urgent, and the furnace exceeding hot, the flame of the fire slew those men that took up Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego
But to answer all your questions so that you do not think I'm avoiding them, the answer to all of them is no, in regards to it meaning literal. But I do agree with the timing of these things you submitted. And I have numerous reasons why the literal can't be meant. One of them being Revelation 18:10. Can't have anyone standing afar off observing, in any sense, if what you submitted per 2 Peter 3 is to be taken as literal.
But that is hardly the only reason I don't take those things in 2 Peter 3 in the literal sense. But it is among the major reasons I don't.