Sure oz,BoL,
Your view of Wikipedia is not convincing to me. I'm presently writing a curriculum for religious instruction in secular high schools, so I emailed leading evangelical theologian and apologist, Dr Norman Geisler, for an outline of the apologetic model he uses.
What did he do? He referred me to his article on Wikipedia: 'Outline of Geisler's apologetic system'.
Geisler has written 4 vols of Systematic Theology, several vols on apologetics, and he dares to give me an outline of his theological views on defending the faith through an article on Wikipedia. He obviously knows the vision of Wikipedia can be used to promote his views.
Could it be that you are the one out of step with some of the theological work that represents sound theology that is being promoted on Wikipedia?
Oz
What's wrong with using anything on the net?
I find that wikipedia is very good at summing up different topics.
Maybe some posters here never liked the Encyclopedia Britannica either??