Poll - Tattooing: from male military and biker ethos...to viable witness means for both genders?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Tattooing: from past male military and biker ethos...to viable witness means for both genders?

  • Yes, I agree

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • No, I disagree

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Rather not say

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
To be honest I'm not for sure how old they were when they started their tats. My son, who is the youngest, has no tats for whatever reason he just doesn't.
These days it's often 18, anyway, for first ink.

It used to be very much a man thing; although now it's become a very womanly thing to do.

(Not surprising that it was your daughters rather than your son that decided to do it, right? Apparently in North America, 59%-70% or more of parlor clients are female: rather a sea change demographically since the time it was almost exclusively a male thing. Anyway, for either gender it seems like it has opened a lot of potential for faith based ink.)
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
Yes. I like what @Acolyte said. I think she and I agree on many things.
I would tell a teen not to get any tattoos till they're in their 20's...
but if someone 18 really wanted one, I don't see how you could stop them or what is radically wrong with it.

Sometimes the battles are just not worth it....
Save it for the wars!
While it always was a thing for young men in the military to some extent, now for young women from 18 onwards it's so seemingly widespread that as an option it's really a bit like getting double pierced ears was 30-40 years ago: maybe a bit edgy at first but soon became very mainstream, right?
 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
10,727
5,716
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
While it always was a thing for young men in the military to some extent, now for young women from 18 onwards it's so seemingly widespread that as an option it's really a bit like getting double pierced ears was 30-40 years ago: maybe a bit edgy at first but soon became very mainstream, right?
Agreed.
I remember the first double ear piercings --- they looked kind of funny.
Now I think they look nice if the right earrings are worn.

And as to girls getting "inked", as you put it, I think it's already mainstream.
I live in small town and many young girls have cute tattoos in visible places. I remember when they used to try to "hide" them because it was just starting to switch from male to female.


I like how this looks:

And this is me, my daughter, and all my granddaughters (4):

All got it done at under a year of age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: farouk

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
Agreed.
I remember the first double ear piercings --- they looked kind of funny.
Now I think they look nice if the right earrings are worn.

And as to girls getting "inked", as you put it, I think it's already mainstream.
I live in small town and many young girls have cute tattoos in visible places. I remember when they used to try to "hide" them because it was just starting to switch from male to female.


I like how this looks:

And this is me, my daughter, and all my granddaughters (4):

All got it done at under a year of age.
Yes, it's nice.

Seems to be the widely benign and wholesome thing to do to get the second holes done in one's teens, right? (...probably not excluding your family, now or in the future...)

And then, typically it's at or around 18 that the new adult (especially young women) - maybe even for the 18th b-day - does the parlor visit, often an occasion supported by family and friends.

(Typical trends, ...right?)
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
Choices made when young, don't look so good when you are older and wiser, when the skin looses it's elasticity, becoming thin and wrinkled. It is not so easy to grow old gracefully, when tattoos are emblazoned upon the body.
charity:

It's actually not unusual for wearers to go back to the parlor after a few years and have a design touched up with a little ink to compensate for fading. (Maybe your daughter whom you mentioned has done this already or will do it in due course.)
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
... I probably wouldn't suggest getting one to my grandchildren (20-15 years old), on the other hand I would give them a ride if they decided they wanted one. FOREVER
PS:

Acolyte:

So are they aware yet that their grandmother herself is inked? :)
 

Acolyte

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2018
370
515
93
Midwest/usa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
PS:

Acolyte:

So are they aware yet that their grandmother herself is inked? :)

They are, and they like the frog. Its on my ankle. Well, lower calf and ankle. They like the colors. My son has several, questionable about meaning. The kids don't seem interested in getting them. Price is a deterent, but not the only one. Wish there were semi-perm that last 3 years and disappear. If you loved it you could get perm. For me, I wouldn't have. But that's just me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: farouk

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
They are, and they like the frog. Its on my ankle. Well, lower calf and ankle. They like the colors. My son has several, questionable about meaning. The kids don't seem interested in getting them.
Well, if the idea eventually came from them they would in any case readily get a ride to the parlor from their grandmother, wouldn't they?

So anyway they like it. Sounds also as if the colors that they like are still quite strong and not faded. Still the original colors, maybe? not unusually if a tattoo's colors do fade, ppl do go back to the parlor to have a bit of color added. (Maybe if you did this eventually, rather than it being a case of you accompanying the grandchildren to the parlor -so to speak-, they would be willing to accompany you to see the colors being strengthened...you must know, anyway...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acolyte

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
My son, who is the youngest, has no tats for whatever reason he just doesn't.

It may be that increasingly for younger ppl, not to be tattooed will become almost a radical act of fashion, going against a huge trend...

(While for your daughters maybe it was simply a natural, straightforward thing to do; part of such a huge trend. I saw a quote from the Bible Belt - which I mentioned before - which shows just how huge a trend it has become.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: soul man

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
PS: Here it is:

QueenCat said:
Around here (Bible Belt), it is common, especially among evangelical Christians, for the girls under about 40 to have religious tattoos. More do than don't, especially when you get to the under 30 crowd. I hardly know any female at church that is under 30 that does not have a tattoo.
forums dot thewelltrainedmind dot com

Seems anyway to me that it's not necessarily even that individual young people especially young women will happen to have been persuaded by an individual friend among their contemporaries to have it done.


More likely often it's hugely the case that when they get to a certain age the expectation is that it's simply what they go and do.
 
D

Dave L

Guest
It's hugely widespread to get ink, so as a pragmatic means it's obvious to some to use it...
Plus it shows how dedicated one might be to commit their body to the gospel in writing. I think I would take that person more seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: farouk

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
Plus it shows how dedicated one might be to commit their body to the gospel in writing. I think I would take that person more seriously.
Good point.

Someone with a Bible based tattoo - far from seeming frivolous and superficial - is likely radiating the impression: "I try to be a serious young man of conviction" ; "Look, be assured I am a principled young woman".

Instead of just doing it to feel good: it's more likely the other way round, "It feels good to be principled in evangelizing faith".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acolyte and Dave L

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
@Butterfly: FYI, did you see @Dave L 's post - #74, above - indicating that Christians with faith based tattoos might be taken more seriously one ppl realized the depth of their commitment?

Interesting point, right?
 
Last edited:

soul man

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2018
2,570
1,738
113
66
Fletcher
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It may be that increasingly for younger ppl, not to be tattooed will become almost a radical act of fashion, going against a huge trend...

(While for your daughters maybe it was simply a natural, straightforward thing to do; part of such a huge trend. I saw a quote from the Bible Belt - which I mentioned before - which shows just how huge a trend it has become.)

Yea your probably right, new form of rebellion ha can't win
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,230
113
North America
Yea your probably right, new form of rebellion ha can't win
Some ppl try to guilt manipulate young women against first ink at around 18, saying it's supposedly bad rebellion.

Others would plausibly say it's actually more likely a form of fairly benign conformity to a huge trend (a bit like double ear piercing was 30 or 40 years ago).

To put a positive gloss, among Christian young ppl it certain provides for a lot of opportunities for faith / Bible tattoo designs, doesn't it?