Replacement theology

[CoreIssue]

 

[CoreIssue]

 

[CoreIssue]

 

[CoreIssue]

Fulfillment Theology / April 9th 2012 - Malcolm Hedding

 

[CoreIssue]

Ligon Duncan on Covenant Theology vs. Dispensationalism

 

[CoreIssue]

Simply replacing the name replacement theology with fulfillment theology, not a change of belief.

 

[Lady Crosstalk]

CoreIssue,

It would be helpful if you would provide summaries of the videos. Those who want to, could then watch any or all of them, if interested because of your summaries. :)

 

[CoreIssue]

CoreIssue,

It would be helpful if you would provide summaries of the videos. Those who want to, could then watch any or all of them, if interested because of your summaries. :)

There's just too much material covered in each video to first watch every second and then create a full summary.

I am providing the data for those that wish to to see.

 

[Lady Crosstalk]

There's just too much material covered in each video to first watch every second and then create a full summary.

I am providing the data for those that wish to to see.

But, if everyone says, "TLDR" you have done a lot of work for nothing.

 

[CoreIssue]

But, if everyone says, "TLDR" you have done a lot of work for nothing.

Many can and often do the same with much shorter posts by anyone.

 

[Lady Crosstalk]

Brief summary--->This one is pretty succinct and Dave Hunt lays out the conflict between the Bible and Replacement Theology very well, in my opinion.

 

[Lady Crosstalk]

This fellow is making quite a muddle of the Bible. He is obviously an anti-literalist. Since all of the previous prophecies which have been fulfilled, have been fulfilled quite literally, why would we go that direction?

 

[CoreIssue]

This fellow is making quite a muddle of the Bible. He is obviously an anti-literalist. Since all of the previous prophecies which have been fulfilled, have been fulfilled quite literally, why would we go that direction?

Preterism makes no sense.

 

[Wafer]

There's just too much material covered in each video to first watch every second and then create a full summary.

I am providing the data for those that wish to to see.

I try to avoid anything that offers too much material. That is the mark of a crackpot site. Either a presentation agrees with the bible or it does not. If it agrees, it will be rather short. If it does not, it is not worth watching. It is the bible that sets forth truth, not this or that "ism".

 

[CoreIssue]

I try to avoid anything that offers too much material. That is the mark of a crackpot site. Either a presentation agrees with the bible or it does not. If it agrees, it will be rather short. If it does not, it is not worth watching. It is the bible that sets forth truth, not this or that "ism".

Thing is with massive amounts of information you Absorb it slowly over time. Not one big gulp.

I've had things that I understood immediately. Other things to years.

The key is availability so everyone can absorb at their own rate.

A brief summary statement may make some happy, but it does not really cover the information.

 

[CoreIssue]

We live in a world that once quick instant gratification.

Feels good, but is not reality.

 

[Wafer]

Thing is with massive amounts of information you Absorb it slowly over time. Not one big gulp.

I've had things that I understood immediately. Other things to years.

The key is availability so everyone can absorb at their own rate.

A brief summary statement may make some happy, but it does not really cover the information.

You are not getting the point. People refuse to watch a video without a reason. The summary offers a reason.