Seems making a problem where none exists.
A literal interpretation of the bible does not mean taking every separate word as literal, nor does it mean taking the parables as literal, or something that was poetry as literal, etc, etc...
It's a real problem if we insist the rich man is burning bodily in the flames of hellfire at death. Because Paul is clear that
in the period between our current "tabernacle" in which we groan - an undeniable reference to our current mortal body - and the glorious body to come at the Second Coming, he says we will be "naked" and "unclothed" of any "tabernacle" which means "lying in the grave dead without a body".
It does not mean "in heaven without a body awaiting the resurrection body" which is just plain silly and stupid. If that truly were the case, then how asinine is it for Paul to say, "For in this tabernacle we do groan, being burdened,
not that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon..." - who cares, Paul, if we're "unclothed" or "clothed upon" if we're in heaven rejoicing with everyone else? In the words of Luther who agrees with Phoneman777, "Nay, Paul, go to master (Sir Thomas) Moore and learn another way."
The only way for Paul's words to make sense is if Paul is saying he doesn't want to be lying dead in the grave naked without a body awaiting Jesus to come -
JUST AS IS THE TESTIMONY OF JOB, DAVID, PETER, AND OTHERS - but he wants to skip that an go right from being "absent from the body" to being "present with the Lord", but he knew that didn't happen at death, because he himself says in verse 10, "For we must all stand before the judgment seat of Christ", which everyone agrees happens not at death, but at the "end of the world".
So, here is a clear example of identifying a colossal problem with making this passage literal instead of the parabolic passage that it is, and is not the only problem that arises when doing so. We can't callously brush aside such inconsistencies and pretend they don't exist for the sake of holding on to cherished interpretations. Jesuit Ribera did so, and is why Futurism is so popular today, albeit unBiblical.