Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
Grailhunter,
Maybe if you work through the first 3 posts it will help you sort it out
Read all the post...your point?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Grailhunter,
Maybe if you work through the first 3 posts it will help you sort it out
I think that the issue is some Calvinists rather than the doctrine itself. Calvinism was designed to address a view (a of predestination as it pertains to salvation) that arose within Beza’s articulation of the topic. But Calvinism has grown to be a primary and central understanding of the gospel itself. This is where it fails. It’s like using a hammer to chop down a tree.Exactly the doctrine of Calvinism, they are slanderers of God.
There is a big difference between clairvoyance...knowing that someone is going to hell and forcing them there.
The difference is evil.
]Read all the post...your point?
I will make this point clear.
It is above my pay grade to say that anyone is going to hell.
Judge the sin...not the sinner.
There was a time when the Mafia was predominately Catholic. (It does not matter if they were Baptist.)
I am sure there were good people in the Mafia.
But if I were to meet one, I would tell them to flee the clutches of Satan.
There is no possibility that universal predestination can be called good, fair, or godly.
It is contrary to logic and invalidates all levels of Christianity and slanders God.
What you're saying makes no sense.GG,
The gospel is preached to all men within the sound of it. All men are fully responsible to repent and believe God right now.
God works through means.
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
So we bring the gospel to all we can reach. the results belong to God.
I understand your point, but that is NOT compatible free will.Sorry it took me a bit to address this post. I've been thinking about it since you posted the comments (I'm a slow thinker and not always good at it).
I do disagree (I think). Think of it in human terms.
Suppose you are selling Ford trucks and I like Chevys. We get to know one another and you present a convincing argument on the merits of a Ford truck over a Chevrolet, I may (based on your argument and my view of yoyr opinion) choose to purchase a Ford. I freely made the choice and this of my own free (but not uninfluenced) will. Your will is done, and in a way it has prevailed over my previous Chevy heart. But the decision remained mine and I freely chose to purchase a Ford.
I do see the difference. I believe that God is a God of means, so I think that the first scenario (God speaking to one's heart and persuading one that His way is better) is the work of God in the heart of the lost which brings us to salvation. It is not a violation of one's will, but rather a changing of it in that this better way is demonstrated. One must still choose belief in this better way and choose to repent from that old way.I understand your point, but that is NOT compatible free will.
The fact is not that God is speaking to your heart and makes you understand that HIS way is better...
The fact is that God MAKES YOU,,,FORCES YOU,,,CHANGES YOUR MIND/HEART so that YOU WILL WANT what He wants.
There is a big difference between the two scenarios.
I hope you see the difference.
Your example is just outside influence...a convincing.
Compatible free will is determinism....it's God controlling your choice.
What you're saying makes no sense.
In the calvinist theology, GOD CHOOSES WHOM WILL BE SAVED.
This has been answered before, but in case you missed it.So what EXACTLY is the reason to preach, witness, send missionaries, etc.?
What difference does it make if someone HEARS the gospel message or not?
God has always been ABLE to let Himself be known to man.
Romans 1:19-20
No He cannot choose God. This is the root of much error in the Church.Man has always been able to CHOOSE God.
By YOUR theology, preaching or witnessing or proclaiming the gospel makes no sense at all.
And you say man is responsible for believing.
HOW??
I will make this point clear.
It is above my pay grade to say that anyone is going to hell.
Judge the sin...not the sinner.
There is no possibility that universal predestination can be called good, fair, or godly.
Very true. And religion does not save – salvation is in Christ alone.I will make this point clear.
It is above my pay grade to say that anyone is going to hell.
Judge the sin...not the sinner.
There was a time when the Mafia was predominately Catholic. (It does not matter if they were Baptist.)
I am sure there were good people in the Mafia.
But if I were to meet one, I would tell them to flee the clutches of Satan.
There is no possibility that universal predestination can be called good, fair, or godly.
It is contrary to logic and invalidates all levels of Christianity and slanders God.
If by that you mean everything is predetermined by God, you would be making Him responsible for all the sin and evil in the world. Which is obviously false.I do believe that everything is predestined (at least based on omniscience), but that’s another topic (and a philosophical one).
What I mean is that I cannot separate several things without coming up empty. I’ll leave the dividing, the micro-doctrine, to those of you more proficient that I. Here is how I see it:If by that you mean everything is predetermined by God, you would be making Him responsible for all the sin and evil in the world. Which is obviously false.
Omniscience means that everything is KNOWN by God from the very beginning.
Anthony, who do you believe created the damned?Sorry but this is totally wrong.
God does not sin. God is completely just.
If God did not elect any, no one would be saved.
The biblical God elects a multitude of sinners and predestined them to be conformed to the image of His Son
What I mean is that I cannot separate several things without coming up empty. I’ll leave the dividing, the micro-doctrine, to those of you more proficient that I. Here is how I see it:
I believe that God is omniscient, so I believe that God knew who would and would not be saved. Everything is predestined to unfold as God knows it will occur. What is let out here is the idea that God causes these things to occur or predetermines that they should happen (the difference between “decree” and “ordain”, for example).
But then we have the problem of Creation. If God is omniscient and creates then God has created a predetermined world (a world predestined to live out it’s life as God has determined by the act of creation that it would).
Whether we say that God decreed this to occur, or that God ordained that in occurring it would fit in His plan, or if foreknowledge is relationship based as opposed to a pre-knowledge.....it's all the same in the end. Everything is predestined to occur as God knows it will occur and God created knowing exactly how things would unfold.
How I handle the idea (above is, as I indicated, philosophical) is by accepting that God chose me from the foundation of the earth with a purpose prepared beforehand. At the same time, my salvation necessitated my repentance and belief (my choosing).
The *how* here is very important though.What I mean is that I cannot separate several things without coming up empty. I’ll leave the dividing, the micro-doctrine, to those of you more proficient that I. Here is how I see it:
I believe that God is omniscient, so I believe that God knew who would and would not be saved. Everything is predestined to unfold as God knows it will occur. What is let out here is the idea that God causes these things to occur or predetermines that they should happen (the difference between “decree” and “ordain”, for example).
But then we have the problem of Creation. If God is omniscient and creates then God has created a predetermined world (a world predestined to live out it’s life as God has determined by the act of creation that it would).
Whether we say that God decreed this to occur, or that God ordained that in occurring it would fit in His plan, or if foreknowledge is relationship based as opposed to a pre-knowledge.....it's all the same in the end. Everything is predestined to occur as God knows it will occur and God created knowing exactly how things would unfold.
How I handle the idea (above is, as I indicated, philosophical) is by accepting that God chose me from the foundation of the earth with a purpose prepared beforehand. At the same time, my salvation necessitated my repentance and belief (my choosing).
Everyone believes God is omniscient....But as per the OP. WHOM did He foreknow JonC?I believe that God is omniscient, so I believe that God knew who would and would not be saved
Both of your scenarios up above employ free will and this is not calvinistic.I do see the difference. I believe that God is a God of means, so I think that the first scenario (God speaking to one's heart and persuading one that His way is better) is the work of God in the heart of the lost which brings us to salvation. It is not a violation of one's will, but rather a changing of it in that this better way is demonstrated. One must still choose belief in this better way and choose to repent from that old way.
I see two types of Calvinists here. Some would say that God recreates those He elects so that they will believe (like that old movie..invasion of the body snatchers). God violates man's will and as Creator God has that right. Others believe that God uses other people to persuade. This was Spurgeon's argument. God sends a friend who tells you about the gospel, perhaps not for the first time, but you are persuaded of the gospel's truth and you choose to "come and drink".
Anthony, who do you believe created the damned?