Ok...I see what you are saying now!!!
In theory: If I
know that I have a true relationship with Him I can use myself as the minimum criteria that must be met as evidence that someone else has a true relationship with Him.
So as long as someone believes, practices, preaches, teaches etc. the same thing that I do it is then that I KNOW that they have a true relationship with Him. If they don't met my criteria I know they don't have a true relationship with Him.
I guess I could put my thought process on this matter in a scenario: A person comes to me and says that they KNOW they have a true relationship with Him. I say ditto...ME TOO....let's be friends and talk Scripture. Several conversations/days later they tell me that one MUST eat His body and drink His blood in the form of bread/wine to have a true relationship with Him because scripture says
Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. They say I want to have eternal life and be raised on the last day that is why I participate in the Eucharist.
I tell them, no, no, no, that's not true. That is NOT what Scripture means. It's a metaphor etc. etc. etc.
So I ask you justbyfaith...which one of us truly has a relationship with him? The one who participates in bread/wine or the one who doesn't? BTW...we both think that we don't need anyone to teach us so we walk away from each other mad....
Mary