Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven of Nine

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2020
733
636
93
North Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
For a growing number of evangelical Christians, Trump is no longer the lesser of two evils

It has long been taken for granted that the majority of evangelical Christians in the United States will vote for Donald Trump.

That may well be the case. But there are recent signs that fewer evangelicals will support Trump this time around than in 2016.

In an August 2020 poll for Fox News, Trump registered a 38-point advantage over Joe Biden among among white evangelical voters. That is impressive, but it pales in comparison with his 61-point advantage over Hillary Clinton among evangelicals in the 2016 election.

Meanwhile, a Pew survey on Oct. 13 found that white evangelical support for Trump had slipped since August, from 83% to 78%.

Click HERE to read the rest of the article.

It's a good article and I recommend reading it in its entirety, especially before commenting on the excerpt I posted.
 
Last edited:

Heart2Soul

Spiritual Warrior
Staff member
May 10, 2018
9,863
14,508
113
65
Tulsa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Biden actually did us a big favor by being such a poor Candidate. He has exposed the democrat's willingness to undermine the Democratic process. And also the media's willingness to cover for them in every way.

Biden should be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom for the work he has done to expose this corruption.
I meditated and prayed about the fraud taking place and I asked God why would they risk such a blatant act of treason against the Constitution, knowing if they got caught it would destroy the integrity of the party?
Answer: to stop the investigations into the deep state and keep themselves out of prison.
If Biden becomes president he could easily order all investigations to stop. Or give everyone clemency.
 

Seven of Nine

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2020
733
636
93
North Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
For a growing number of evangelical Christians, Trump is no longer the lesser of two evils

It has long been taken for granted that the majority of evangelical Christians in the United States will vote for Donald Trump.

That may well be the case. But there are recent signs that fewer evangelicals will support Trump this time around than in 2016.

In an August 2020 poll for Fox News, Trump registered a 38-point advantage over Joe Biden among among white evangelical voters. That is impressive, but it pales in comparison with his 61-point advantage over Hillary Clinton among evangelicals in the 2016 election.

Meanwhile, a Pew survey on Oct. 13 found that white evangelical support for Trump had slipped since August, from 83% to 78%.

Click HERE to read the rest of the article.

It's a good article and I recommend reading it in its entirety, especially before commenting on the excerpt I posted.

It's clear that the above article is substantial validation for these other articles.

'Record-breaking group' of faith leaders endorses Biden

Bipartisan Christian group forms super PAC to oppose Trump

Faith leaders back Biden in sign that evangelical support for Trump is waning

500 Faith Leaders Endorse Joe Biden And Kamala Harris For The White House

Religious leaders welcome Joe Biden's election as 2nd Catholic to win presidency

More than 350 faith leaders to back Biden for president, including many first-time endorsers
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,142
9,865
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Brabantian - Supremes Likely to Hand Power to Trump
November 12, 2020

biden-thomas.jpg

The Supreme Court Justices will confirm the vote fraud,
and join Clarence Thomas in giving Joe Biden
a taste of the humiliation he deserves after humiliating Thomas
back in 1991.
Also Read-

Constitutional Expert Explains how the Supreme Court or States will award Election to Trump

by Brabantian
(henrymakow.com)
The nine justices of the USA Supreme Court,
have their own deep-set motives to trash team Biden for vote fraud.
These include Biden's personal attacks on Clarence Thomas and Biden-Harris threats to destroy the authority of the US Supreme Court by adding as many new judges as necessary.
Trump's win is not so remote as many think, with one faction of the 'Deep State' or 'Illuminati', itself inclined to back Trump and provide support for the US Supreme Court's likely strong anti-Biden inclinations.


The USA Supreme Court could give Trump a victory here without even needing to declare that Trump has legitimately 'won'. All it needs to do is declare enough doubt about the vote. Then the choice of President devolves in January to the US House of Representatives voting in blocs by state, each state with 1 vote. As most states are Republican, this means Trump wins.

First of all, 3 of the 9 current serving Supreme Court Justices - Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Barrett - were appointed by Trump himself. They owe him a favour. With one Deep State faction itself backing nationalist-Zionist Trump against globalist Bolsheviks, these judges are not only free but deeply inclined, to acknowledge evidence of Biden-Democratic vote fraud.

Secondly, and most importantly, the longest-serving justice on the US Supreme Court is conservative black intellectual Clarence Thomas, sworn in in 1991. His nomination was aggressively fought by then-Senator Joe Biden, managing hearings in what Thomas called "a national disgrace ... a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves."

The central issue was questionable 'me, too' type sexual harassment allegations by an angry female law professor who was formerly Thomas' assistant.

Opinion: Joe Biden owes Clarence Thomas an Apology

The problem here for Biden, is that his personal attacks on Clarence Thomas, then a Federal Appeals judge, touch all Supreme Court Justices independently of those justices' race or politics.
thomas.jpg

Unproven allegations by one angry woman, trumpeted by Biden, in what seemed a combination of racist contempt and political malice, strike all Supreme Court judges as hostile and threatening to judicial authority. Their view is that no judge should be questioned and accused and publicly humiliated in this crude manner. With nearly thirty years on the Supreme Court, and now its longest-serving justice, Thomas' view of Biden shenanigans carries deep weight.

PACKING THE COURT
Finally, there is the fact that the current Supreme Court justices resent how, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, in classic Bolshevik fashion, have indulged thinking about 'packing' the US Supreme Court, adding 3 or more to the current 9 justices, to ensure it will rubber-stamp any Democratic Party Bolshevik programme items.
Let's Think About Court-Packing

The USA Supreme Court has had nine justices maximum since the late 1800s, but there is no number specified in the US Constitution. The original number was six, and legislation has altered the number at times between five and ten. Franklin Roosevelt famously sought to add more justices, but this was rejected in the 1930s as a quasi-fascist gambit.
The power of judges in any country, is ultimately fragile, based on acceptance and cooperation of other governmental authorities, along with a kind of illusion that the justices really represent independent 'justice'. As we review Bolshevik or totalitarian regimes, we know the judges are not 'independent', and we scorn their fraudulent courts and 'show trials'.
It is an inheritance of Jewish tradition to support a 'kritarchy', a rule by judges, deciding things much more remotely from the people than legislators. In the USA the 'supremacy of the judges' became de facto the case, although the US Constitution makes the Congress technically supreme, with unlimited powers to remove judges for 'lack of good behaviour', for making rulings against the common good.
Since the 1950s, US judges became more and more 'aggressive', in fact 'legislating from the bench' against the popular and legislative will. First, it was for 'good' things, such as ending segregation, but as we know, judges soon came to enact rights to abortion and gay marriage and anything else they wanted, on the pretext they were able to 'find' all these items as 'implicit' in the 1789 US Constitution.

The 'priesthood' of US judges, like any gang of clergy or bureaucracy, do not want their quasi-magical 'supreme powers' to be torn away from them. Packing the court with as many extra judges as needed, to ensure Bolshevik-friendly verdicts, obviously destroys the significance of the court, making them into mere rubber-stamp clerks. The existing judges do not want this, they want their great power to continue, and Biden-Harris are obviously a threat to this Judaic-style judge supremacy.

It's common to assume that the US Supreme Court will be too frightened to rule that massive, devastating vote fraud took place in 2020 because it would 'de-stabilise' the USA image of democracy. But that ship has already sailed, the horse is out of the barn, 70 million Trump voters can no longer 'un-see' the fraud, and world leaders can see it too.

This election is, in part, a struggle for power between factions within the Deep State itself. The nationalist-Zionist side of the Illuminati - opposed to the globalist side - itself may strongly favour Trump being given his win. The Supreme Court Justices will confirm the vote fraud,
and join Clarence Thomas in giving Joe Biden a taste of the humiliation he deserves after humiliating Thomas back in 1991.

-----------------------------------------
 

Seven of Nine

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2020
733
636
93
North Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Who is actually reading these?

I read the articles. My conservative friends and acquaintances have read them. A pastor recommended a couple of the articles to me. I'm sure a plethora of other people across the country and in other countries whom I've never met (either online or IRL) have also read these articles too.
 

Heart2Soul

Spiritual Warrior
Staff member
May 10, 2018
9,863
14,508
113
65
Tulsa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I have been wondering why you demand this president to be without fault or sin when every president had skeletons in their closet.
You exclaim he is a pathological liar...that means everything he says is a lie.
Everything you despise about him is found in all mankind....if you commit one sin you are guilty of all.....that includes you.
God wants us to pray for others and not hate them....if they are unrepentant sinners then pray for their salvation.
When we pray for a sinner and he turns away from his sin we hide a multitude of sins.
Your hatred for him is duly noted....but your judgment of him is not your place....you will bring your judgment of him upon yourself.
I am only sharing this because this isn't healthy for you physically, mentally, or spiritually.
If he has personally sinned against you then find it in your heart to forgive him so that your sins will also be forgiven.
Praying for you.
God Bless
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,142
9,865
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Sidney Powell: Hundreds Of Thousands Of Fraudulent Ballots Will Be Discarded
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 13, 2020

Sidney Powell, the attorney for Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn who now works for the Trump campaign, is sounding the alarm about how the election outcome may not go the way that Democrats are being told it is by the mainstream media.

Speaking to Fox Business‘ Maria Bartiromo during a recent interview, Powell revealed that the Trump camp is sitting on substantial statistical evidence yet to be unveiled that shows the ballot counts in numerous states are more than likely fraudulent.

Sidney-Powell-Hundreds-of-Thousands-of-Fraudulent-Ballots-Will-Be-Discarded-e1605282036562.jpg


Powell says her next venture is to explain these statistical anomalies to the public, showing how it is mathematically impossible for the election as it is currently being reported by the corporate media to be honest and fair.

Based on her statements, Powell and the Trump camp have evidence in their possession to suggest that the same number of votes for Biden were injected into both Wisconsin and Michigan three different times, for instance.


This is statistically impossible apart from some kind of fraud or “mistake.”

“I think there were two different injections of exactly the same numbers in Michigan and then in Milwaukee it happened three times,” Powell contends. “Needless to say, time is of the absolute essence.”

On top of this, Powell says multiple states did not even follow the election law established by their own legislatures, including in Pennsylvania where the State Supreme Court illegally extended the voting deadline past 8pm on election day.

“That’s a whole separate issue,” Powell says about these particularly irregularities.

Beyond that, four states “deviated significantly from what the legislature told them to do,” Powell added.

This included rushing in “pallets of ballots” through “the back door” of the ballot counting centers in the middle of the night.


“There is tons of evidence that hundreds of thousands of ballots are going to have to be discarded and they’re all for Biden,” Powell further revealed, sending a major arrow across the bow.

Burden Of Proof On Biden Camp To Prove Questionable Ballots Are Valid
Yet another glaring problem with the election was the use of Dominion Voting Systems, a software program that has since been exposed as swapping votes, padding vote counts, and performing other illicit functions that clearly altered the true election results.

“There is a substantial problem with the Dominion system,” Powell explained. “We are reviewing all of that and connecting the dots.”

The good news is that the Trump team only needs to prove these claims by a preponderance of the evidence rather than beyond all reasonable doubt, which makes it a much easier nut to crack.

“Given the fact that a ballot itself is evidence, the burden should be on the party seeking to introduce the ballots in their favor to prove that the chain of custody was maintained,” Powell says.

When asked if she believes that Attorney General William Barr and the Department of Justice (DOJ) will find anything in their own investigations into election fraud, Powell responded that if they somehow do not then they are engaging in “willful blindness.”

“There are stacks of evidence and testimony from any number of witnesses – I’ve lost count of how many they have (because) more pour in every day,” Powell further explained.

“I would encourage every American patriot who saw an irregularity such as a thumb drive being inserted into a voting machine during the tally, and the tally suddenly changing to massive pallets of ballots coming in the back door in the middle of the night and not properly handled at all, and just cranked out” to come forward and submit their stories as evidence, she concluded.

Reference: DistributedNews.com
 

bukka

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2020
563
443
63
Western North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I suggest that the controversy about the election can be resolved very simply. It involves answering very simple questions.

Has massive election fraud occurred? If so, Trump has to prove it if he believes that the election had been stolen from him.

Has Trump proven that massive election fraud has occurred? According to the courts, he has not. NO PROOF OF MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD HAS BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURTS.

Is Trump a man of veracity, a man whose moral character is unquestioned? On this, he is a man known for not telling the truth, and his moral character is highly questionable. This means, regrettably, that there is possible mendacity involved with the lawsuits.

I suggest that members on Christianity Board need not attack each other personally on this issue. Let us tap down the emotions regarding these allegations of fraud. That is all they remain, allegations. And allegations are not facts.

Let us allow the facts of this matter to speak for themselves. Trump has no proof of massive election fraud. The courts do not think that he has made his case.
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,142
9,865
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I suggest that the controversy about the election can be resolved very simply. It involves answering very simple questions.

Has massive election fraud occurred? If so, Trump has to prove it if he believes that the election had been stolen from him.

Has Trump proven that massive election fraud has occurred? According to the courts, he has not. NO PROOF OF MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD HAS BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURTS.

Is Trump a man of veracity, a man whose moral character is unquestioned? On this, he is a man known for not telling the truth, and his moral character is highly questionable. This means, regrettably, that there is possible mendacity involved with the lawsuits.

I suggest that members on Christianity Board need not attack each other personally on this issue. Let us tap down the emotions regarding these allegations of fraud. That's all they remain, allegations. And allegations are not facts.

Let us allow the facts of this matter to speak for themselves. Trump has no proof of massive election fraud. The courts do not think that he's made his case.
I know you keep singing the same tune about the President, who needs to defend himself. When I first heard you I was going to comment about it. It's not really all about the President.

No, the people that voted for him, whether Republican, Democrat, Independent or Non-affiliated all need to show this evident of widespread and massive system fraud. And they already have and are continuing to expand on this legal evidence appropriate for court action. It is the people's affair and not their national representative.

So, his people have substantial proof of massive fraud. It cannot be deleted or hidden or stolen as the election was itself. The opposition I suspect would love destroy all evidence. They cannot, and it will stand on its own merits in court.

No, there is no gearing down of evil works committed. Truth is allowed to be discussed here. Wanting to ban this discussion makes me very suspicious of your words and their intent.

Are you a leftist and, or a troll for the left?
 

bukka

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2020
563
443
63
Western North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I know you keep singing the same tune about the President, who needs to defend himself. When I first heard you I was going to comment about it. It's not really all about the President.

Agreed, Apak. It has nothing initially to do with the President. He alleges massive voter fraud has taken place. That means he needs to prove it in a court of law to establish that a miscarriage of justice has taken place.

No, the people that voted for him, whether Republican, Democrat, Independent or Non-affiliated all need to show this evident of widespread and massive system fraud. And they already have and are continuing to expand on this legal evidence appropriate for court action. It is the people's affair and not their national representative.

This is not correct. Trump is making the allegation that massive voter fraud has taken place. He may have other parties join him on his legal actions. But it is not incumbent upon anyone else to prove the allegations. That is Trump's legal burden and responsibility. If he is to be believed in his allegations about fraud, he has to prove it.

So, his people have substantial proof of massive fraud. It cannot be deleted or hidden or stolen as the election was itself.

This fraud has yet to be proven. If it has, it has to be brought before the courts. This has not yet been done.

The opposition I suspect would love destroy all evidence. They cannot, and it will stand on its own merits in court.

This is unsupported allegation regarding the political opposition to Trump. I would agree that if Trump actually has facts concerning massive election fraud, it will stand on its own merits in court.

No, there is no gearing down of evil works committed. Truth is allowed to be discussed here.

I agree.

Wanting to ban this discussion makes me very suspicious of your words and their intent.

I suggest you to be attentive to what I've posted. Let us keep the discussion to the facts. At this point, according to the courts, no proof has been presented that there has been massive election fraud.

Are you a leftist and, or a troll for the left?

This is an amusing question. Let us keep the discussion to the facts. At this point, according to the courts, no proof has been presented that there has been massive election fraud.

Facts are not politically right or left, they just are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,142
9,865
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Agreed, Apak. It has nothing initially to do with the President. He alleges massive voter fraud has taken place. That means he needs to prove it in a court of law to establish that a miscarriage of justice has taken place.



This is not correct. Trump is making the allegation that massive voter fraud has taken place. He may have other parties join him on his legal actions. But it is not incumbent upon anyone else to prove the allegations. That is Trump's legal burden and responsibility. If he is to be believed in his allegations about fraud, he has to prove it.



This fraud has yet to be proven. If it has, it has to be brought before the courts. This has not yet been done.



This is unsupported allegation regarding the political opposition to Trump. I would agree that if Trump actually has facts concerning massive election fraud, it will stand on its own merits in court.



I agree.



I suggest you to be attentive to what I've posted. Let us keep the discussion to the facts. At this point, according to the courts, no proof has been presented that there has been massive election fraud.



This is an amusing question. Let us keep the discussion to the facts. At this point, according to the courts, no proof has been presented that there has been massive election fraud.

Facts are not politically right or left, they just are.

I will only comment on your first statement because you did not read for whatever reason what I said.

You said, "That means he needs to prove it in a court of law to establish that a miscarriage of justice has taken place."

Once more: he does NOT need to prove anything as I said, HIS people do. What can you not understand when I say that he PERSONALLY does NOT need to prove anything. Why do you purposely IGNORE HIS PEOPLE as the focus of justice here. And therefore it makes the rest of your statements illogical and meaningless.

For some reason, you do not want to admit, and some how you cannot wrap your head around the fact that there are literally 1000s of testimonies and witnesses, with facts: documents, recordings and even many actual ballots revealing fraud though many devices and methods.......Bye
 

bukka

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2020
563
443
63
Western North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I will only comment on your first statement because you did not read for whatever reason what I said.

I think that you were perfectly clear, Apak.

You said, "That means he needs to prove it in a court of law to establish that a miscarriage of justice has taken place."

Once more: he does NOT need to prove anything as I said, HIS people do. What can you not understand when I say that he PERSONALLY does NOT need to prove anything. Why do you purposely IGNORE HIS PEOPLE as the focus of justice here. And therefore it makes the rest of your statements illogical and meaningless.

If he has a proof about massive election fraud that has been researched by others, that is acceptable in a court of law. My words were never meant to be construed to mean anything else. But it is Trump's legal burden to present that evidence to the courts. This has not yet been done.

For some reason, you do not want to admit, and some how you cannot wrap your head around the fact that there are literally 1000s of testimonies and witnesses, with facts: documents, recordings and even many actual ballots revealing fraud though many devices and methods.......Bye

Perhaps these testimonies may exist, but then the complaints of anecdotal and hearsay evidence arises. Also there is the issue of the arithmetic that comes in that has already occurred in the other lawsuits. Given the distribution of the many thousands in the swing states, Trump has to prove the fraud involving numbers that are daunting. The courts would have to consider that the fraud involves millions of people. That would seem to be highly unlikely. If it involves the Dominion voting system, the courts would be asking for the proof. They would want to know what specific machines have been affected and how that Trump and his researchers know this information. At this point, this proof has not been offered.

There is still no proof for massive election fraud.
 

April_Rose

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2020
8,520
7,824
113
34
Ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The score i saw shows biden at two hundred and ninety now and trump at two hundred and thirty two .
Seeing you sign says Biden is not my president , i am assuming you saw something else .





It's been 290 for Biden,.. but Trump was at 217 before. :D
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,142
9,865
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"The courts would have to consider that the fraud involves millions of people. That would seem to be highly unlikely. "

Really, you say millions would have to be committing the fraud..you are joking, right..a little over the top....lol Yes, millions were affected by the hundreds that participated in the fraud. indeed.

"There is still no proof for massive election fraud."

Again false..there is proof of MASSIVE fraud. I guess you want the fake media to show you on TV all the names involved in the fraud, the actual ballot affected, the compromise SW code, all the names of the fraudsters like in a criminal investigation before you can say there is proof....I hope you don't believe this is called your proof, or maybe you want all this info delivered to your front door by mail...lol

Thanks for the small talk...later
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo
Status
Not open for further replies.