The Many Factual and Logical Problems of One Covenant Theology, Part1

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pavel Mosko

Active Member
Dec 19, 2021
253
115
43
58
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Over the years, many have debated these issues with Messianic friends and leaders. There are valid ways to be Messianic without falling into Judaizing, and Jewish background can serve as a legitimate resource for illuminating biblical passages. Rabbi Jason Sobel (Fusion Global) stands out as one of the strongest examples—deeper and less sensationalistic—while Rabbi Jonathan Cahn offers another voice in this space. I however want to address the practical world view problems of folks that push this worldview strongly ideologically speaking beyond the obvious ones we know about reading the New Testament.


1. Wineskin Problems​


Jesus’ well-known statement about new wine requiring new wineskins (Matthew 9:14-17; Mark 2:21-22; Luke 5:36-39) addressed Pharisaic fasting traditions, yet it carries broader implications, aligning with Hillel-style principles of expansion and renewal (e.g. - 1. Kal Vahomer (Light and heavy) ).


There are strong reasons for setting aside the full Mosaic Covenant as the operating “wineskin.” In the ancient world, God’s rule over Israel functioned like a domain: the ruler’s authority extended beyond personal holdings to encompass vassals, supporting lands, and the entire national system that sustained them. This pattern characterized most societies (outside exceptions like the Assyrians, Babylonians, and later Rome). For God’s dominion to reach the whole world while preserving the ethnic diversity He ordained (see Revelation 7:9), two paths existed: either require mass conversion to Judaism (similar to Islamic models) or accomplish what actually occurred in Acts 15—uniting diverse peoples to the Son while honoring their God-given ethnic identities.


(Grok for the ease of comprehension smoothed out some of the context I wanted specifically a domain in the ancient and Medieval world was the property the rule personally owned that paid for their upkeep. They could at times get taxes on top of that but that was their private land, and in that context, God taking the tiny nation of Israel a place with no prestige to start with says a lot! (many scriptural footnotes and lessons) Anyway Pentecost in the book of Acts in many ways is God beginning to literally take the world into his domain. Basically, he already owned the world by World by being Creator of everything, All Powerful etc. of, but this comes into evicting Satan from squatting on areas of it via the Fall is the easiest analogy I can use).



The New Covenant fulfills and transcends the old. Hebrews makes this explicit: the first covenant had inherent weaknesses and was always intended as temporary (Hebrews 8:7; 7:18; 8:5; 10:1). The law served as a guardian until Christ (Galatians 3:23-25), and believers are now released from it to serve in the new way of the Spirit (Romans 7:6). Acts 15’s Jerusalem Council confirmed this shift: Gentiles did not need to adopt the full Mosaic system—only basic requirements for fellowship. This preserved unity in Christ without erasing ethnic diversity.


2. Ecclesiology Problems​


This may be the most challenging area. The early church did not develop widespread “Messianic synagogues” as a normative model, despite opportunities. Apostles initially preached in synagogues and the temple as an evangelistic strategy (Acts 2–3, 13, 17), and Jewish believers continued attending them where possible. However, distinct Christian gatherings quickly emerged: house churches, breaking bread in homes (Acts 2:46), and developing practices that were identifiably Christian (see the Didache, Ignatius, and Justin Martyr).


Saint James the Just led the most “Jewish” community in Jerusalem and remained Torah-observant (Acts 21:17-26), yet even under his leadership the Council relaxed Torah requirements for Gentiles. Post-70 AD (temple destruction) and especially after the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 AD), distinctly Jewish-Christian expressions became minority phenomena.


Why the expected Messianic model did not become dominant:


  • Theological priority: The New Testament emphasizes “one new man” (Ephesians 2:11-22), unity in Christ that breaks the dividing wall without erasing identities (Galatians 3:28). Separate parallel structures risked re-erecting barriers the gospel had removed.
  • Practical realities: Rapid growth, persecution, Jewish-Roman wars, and eventual synagogue expulsions made a dual-system approach extremely difficult.
  • Wineskin/logistical issues: Retrofitting the full old covenant framework (temple, priesthood, calendar as binding) onto the new revelation would have contradicted Hebrews’ message of a “better” priesthood and sacrifice. It would also have created massive logistical burdens for a movement already focused on being witnesses to the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.

There most likely will be a second part to this based on other random points that I have currently forgotten. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TitusTwoWife

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
15,794
5,939
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hebrews 8:13
13 In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Mosko

Jay Ross

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2011
9,361
3,484
113
QLD
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Please note the difference between "neo" and "kainios." "neo" has the meaning which is associated with "age" which is relatively "young" or "fresh," whereas "Kainos" has the meaning of "Like New" or "refreshed."

In the Parable of the Freshly extracted wine juice from the harvested grapes, it can only be put into very recently refreshed/refurbished wineskins otherwise the wineskin is too hard and brittle and will burst because of the fermentation of the fresh wine in the wineskins.

Even a "new" wine skin, if left to long before it is used, will become hard and brittle and it will also burst when filled with new/fresh unfermented wine. Sounds complicated, but this parable speaks of the condition, i.e. the pliability of the wineskin itself, because if the wineskin which has become old over time, is not refreshed to make it pliable like a brand-new wineskin it will burst if used to store fresh wine in them.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The prophecy in Genesis 49:10 that Jacob gave to his son Judah for the last days reveals part of the reason why Judah is still ordained today to follow Torah. It says the law or a law-giver will not depart between Judah's feet until Shiloh (Jesus) come.

Too many Christian Churches do not teach my Gentile Christian brethren why God's laws must still be taught within the Church today. What the Apostles in Acts 15 agreed should be kept by believing Gentiles does not mean many other laws in God's law cannot or should not be taught in the Christian Churches. The difference is that only Faith on Jesus Christ is what saves us, and not works of the law.

But many of God's laws are written on the books in Western society. This is one of the things that many of my Gentile Christian brethren fail to understand. And Apostle Paul taught the importance of God's laws within his Epistles based on The Gospel (1 Timothy 1; 1 Cor.6; Gal.5).

This is why one of Judah's responsibilities that shall never go away in Christian society is law-giving in the Christian nations. God's laws are rooted in Western society, and not just as a religious purpose, but to handle the ungodly and sinner.