Just another wannabe politically correct extreme left wing fake pastor seeking to impress and make a name for himself.
So lets see, there is "AMEN", then they interjected "AMAN", and now there is the interjection of "AWOMAN".
What's next, "ALBGT"?
Since the word "Amen" is primarily used as an acknowledgement to
agree with God and the Bible, then KJV- Genesis 1:26-27
delivers the reality that both a man and a woman each,
are "Man" altogether, of which in the past, has been clearly expressed as "mankind".
[
27] So
God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female
created he them.
Ultimately, the word "mankind" has always been understood to be inclusive as being BOTH "men and women".
So, Biblically speaking, the question remains, why was the word "man" being used in the word "mankind", and not "humankind"?
Ans. The
MAN Adam
was created from the ground (earth elements) by God
FIRST.
THEN later, God created* a woman (Eve) from
out of the man. KJV- Genesis 2:18-24. A
Eve was NOT created from the ground, but rather through the part of the man called Adam.
[
21] And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam and he slept: and
he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
[
22]
And [from] the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man,
made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
[
23] And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because
she was taken out of Man.
[
24] Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and
they [together] shall be one flesh.
So then, what can we conclude about "singular" people?
Ans. Each of themselves and by themselves, cannot "multiply" for the future generation of the species, that God called "man".
For the future generations of "man-kind", the equation is simple enough:
man+
woman=
children.
So then, the equations of
m+m=2m and
w+w=2w, never can
bring about the desired result of
m+w="c"-hildren.