Search results

Hi Episkopos, Still using the old "straw man" tactic, I see. I haven't found anyone referring to those principles from scripture as "legalism" "or laws", as you falsely claim. Sadly it's just another one of the many fantasies you cherish to support your works of the law rebellion against God...

Hi Sr.Brandon, True some here may just be misunderstood. But there are others here who are from extreme opposites just like we see in scripture. Grace and works of the law cannot be mixed (Rom 11:6). Gal 4:21-29 "Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? For it is...

Hi HollyRock, Unfortuantely we see millions of people who think they are headed for Heaven no matter that they judge righteousness by works of the law. This is unbelief. It results in not being permitted to enter His rest (Heb 4:1-11). Grace is not a licence to do wrong (and God chastises any...

Hi Episkopos, You claim you don't use scripture as theres no point, somehow believing that your own words have more power than God's. Also you don't give plain answers so that we have to search you out to come to an understanding of your fantasy-"truth" according to Episkopos. But, as we have...

Hi Episkopos, You claim that you are sometimes perfectly keeping the 10 commandments and sometimes not keeping them perfectly. You describe this as either walking in the Spirit or not walking in the Spirit. I'm curious how your doctrine sees where you would stand if you were to die whilst not...

Hi Episkopos, Your doctrine is one of condemnation. You have already shared with us that you do not walk in the Spirit and therefore sin, being lawless. Your doctrine says that you do not know Christ. But what does the true gospel say? John 3:18 "He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he...

Hi Episkopos, I wonder if Axehead shares your same works of the law doctrinal view that you are lawless, do not walk in the Spirit and hence don't know Christ because your life is not perfect. Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift...

Hi HollyRock, Habitual means done constantly, regularly. I guess that would describe most of the behavior we see even amongst ourselves. One example someone gave me was how they regularly snap at their children. And whilst they regret it they admit they still regularly do it. This is habitual...

Hi HollyRock, What determines when disobedience is "habitual"? Is it 7x70? How often throughout your years as a Christian have you committed the same wrong? Often enough to be "habitual"? Another example is the high rates of divorce and subsequent marriage to another partner, as is common in...

The "straw man" argument of the works crowd (born after the flesh) is their way of persecuting the "children of promise" (Gal 4:22-29)

Alternatively (and rightly) it is you Episkopis who rejects the truth. Instead you seek to deceive and condemn those here who are under grace. Who else did this? Hmm!

As we've already seen from your posts Episkopos, your doctrine shows that you do not know Christ anyway. You yourself admit you are lawless. And then you judge those under grace as lawless, insisting that we should also follow your path of being justified by works of the law.

Hi RichardBurger, Correct, this is the typical agument the religious/works crowd put foward. Yet the works crowds own obvious lawlessness, whilst they judge those under grace as lawless, shows that they do not know Christ anyway. For the works crowd Tit 1:16 says: "They profess that they know...

Hi Episkopos, Your lawlessness, whilst judging those under grace as lawless, is a common characteristic seen from the works crowd your in. For the works crowd Tit 1:16 says: "They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good...

Hi Episkopos, As mark s has rightly pointed out, by your own words you admit you still sin therefore your own doctrine shows that you do not know Christ. Interestingly your claim to being one of the very few with true understanding of scriptures is in stark contradiction to the fact that your...

Hi Episkopis, You said regarding my previous post to Kidron: "Episkopos sure would seem like a bad dude according to this proof!" Those on the forum here can decide for themselves looking back through your posts to confirm if what I said is correct. Most here do know without having to check it...

Hi Kidron, You are already no doubt aware of Episkopis' doctrine and style of discussion, but I'll offer my understanding of his false doctrines and his position as it may be of help. Episkopis' doctrine is to bring people under works of the law and any who reject his doctrine he labels as...

Hi Episkopis, It seems we're at a continual stalmate with no point continuing further discussion. I understand from your doctrine that you are in unbelief, whilst according to your works of the law doctrine I'm allegedly lawless. You said: "I try to not share scriptures unless I think they...

Hi Episkopis, Your grace+works of the law doctrine you offer is not supported in scripture. As you claim you still sin then according to your doctrine you will die. It seems that Christ is a stumbling block for you just as he was for physical Israel.

Hi Episkopis, Regarding your example using Esau consider Heb 12:15-17. "looking carefully lest anyone fall short of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up cause trouble, and by this many become defiled; lest there be any fornicator or profane person like Esau, who for one...