Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    Why is "OUR" limited to two? Why not three, or five, or twelve, or more?
  2. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    I'm with you on this. I was just responding to the notion that "Elohim," being plural, supports the Trinity. It doesn't.
  3. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    Being a Trinitarian, I believe in "One God, the Father Almighty" -- as the opening of the Nicene Creed that I recite regularly puts it. There are not many gods. There is one God. Elohim is plural, signifying many gods in the Pantheon of national gods that the ancient Israelites believed...
  4. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    For Israel, I was thinking primarily of Lev. 4:35, Lev. 5:15-16 and Lev. 16:13. (But Is. 43:25 and Micah 7:18-19 are worth a look too.) There was a mechanism in place under Mosaic law for forgiveness of sin. For non-Jews without the written law of Moses as their guide, the "law" by which they...
  5. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    The ban was lifted for a while, and recently reinstated.
  6. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    I need to push back just a bit here. Deut. 11:26 portrays the Law as both a blessing to those who keep it and a curse to those who don’t. Galatians swept the “blessing” part under the rug. Gal. 3:10 stresses that the curse follows a single slip-up (quoting Deut. 27:26). Gal. 3:11 tells us that...
  7. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    Nope. But I read the Bible every day. I don't communicate with God through reading it, although I think He communicates with me that way. (In the other direction, it is through prayer.) The Scripture is largely Spirit-driven, so ultimately the Spirit is still my teacher.
  8. R

    Exploring Trinitarian Logic

    Do you even need to read the Scriptures at all? Seems like you're wired in to the Spirit's voice. What an inefficient transmission of knowledge for the Spirit to use the written word as an aid here!
  9. R

    More on GJohn 1.1

    Indeed.
  10. R

    THE Trinity can Now be discussed.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contra_proferentem https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/course_of_performance#:~:text=Establishing%20a%20course%20of%20performance,the%20particular%20contract%20at%20issue.
  11. R

    THE Trinity can Now be discussed.

    A modification of several of these. I think of Christ as our champion in a cosmic battle against the Forces of Evil, our representative (the way David was Israel’s representative when he fought Goliath) -- but unlike with David vs. Goliath, Christ’s victory consisted not in surviving the battle...
  12. R

    More on GJohn 1.1

    This strikes me as portraying Adam as a type for mankind.
  13. R

    WHAT YOU MAY NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THE VIRGIN BIRTH

    Have you been following my OP, Was Jesus a Literal Son of David?
  14. R

    WHAT YOU MAY NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THE VIRGIN BIRTH

    Joseph IS mentioned as being in the lineage. I see nothing here that places Mary in the lineage.
  15. R

    THE Trinity can Now be discussed.

    You've peeled back the bark now, my friend! This is indeed the key. All Christians pay attention to the role played by the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in their salvation. Some favor the “ransom” theory (Matthew 20:28/Mark 10:45) that by sinning, mankind became Satan’s captives, and Christ’s...
  16. R

    THE Trinity can Now be discussed.

    We probably should drag Philo into the mix here.
  17. R

    Was Jesus a Literal Son of David?

    How do we know Mary was a descendant of David?
  18. R

    Was Jesus a Literal Son of David?

    I'd like to think I can manage to get up to 14, thanks to my 20 fingers and toes! sml
  19. R

    More on GJohn 1.1

    Give me an example.