Search results

I believe they are just repeating a doctrine they have taught by other men, instead of looking at the context without this doctrinal bias. They are seeking to defend a doctrine, they are not sincerely seeking the Truth. Also keep in mind some people are meant to be deceived and led astray...

I asked for a verse, not your own spin. That is the Truth causing you to be tormented for telling lies.

They don’t care, when they see the word resurrection to them it means born again spiritually. Lol

No you didn’t. Show me the verse in the words of God that state what you claim below… rwb said: The Holy Spirit being with them, was not permanently in them, Also show me in the words of God where it says “Abaham is the God of the living.” ROFL!clfh

Show me the verse in the words of God that state what you claim below… rwb said: The Holy Spirit being with them, was not permanently in them, Also show me in the words of God where it says “Abaham is the God of the living.” ROFL!

You are misunderstanding my post. When you are born again your body does not change, it is your heart/mind/spirit that is changed. But in the resurrection of the dead in Christ at the last day the Body of Christ( the Church) is resurrected bodily and given immortal bodies.

That’s nonsense. Jesus said God is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He is the God of the Living, not a god of the dead. In order to be a part of the Body of Christ you have to have the Holy Spirit. In order to be a part of the first resurrection of the dead in Christ you must be bodily...

In the news… Israel Bombards Tehran as Retaliatory Strikes Begin “In response to months of continuous attacks from the regime in Iran against the State of Israel – right now the Israel Defense Forces is conducting precise strikes on military targets in Iran," Israel's military said in a...

Here is the problem with that line of thinking. In the Old Testament men where born again of the Holy Spirit before Jesus came, died, and was raised back to life. Yet they were not physically resurrected until after Jesus physically rose from the dead, becoming the first fruits OF the first...

Yes That is exactly what you are confused about. The babbling is coming from Amils who say the first resurrection is past already. 2 Timothy 2:16-18 King James Version 16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And their word will eat as doth a...

Paul knew Jesus was bodily resurrected already and Paul knew what it meant to be born again, but YET Paul did not consider the first resurrection to be past already. In fact Paul warned about this false doctrine. 2 Timothy 2:16-18 King James Version 16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for...

You think that way because you have been deceived into thinking that the bodily first resurrection of the dead in Christ mentioned in Rev. 20:4-6 that happens in an instant, is talking about being born again of the Holy Spirit to individuals over the past 2,000 years or so. But the first...

Well there you go, by your own admission you believe the first resurrection is past and the thousand years has already begun, as is defined in Rev. 20:1-6.

The only problem with that idea is the Holy Spirit cannot be purchased with money…. Acts 8:14-24 King James Version 14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 15 Who, when they were come down, prayed...

Paul knew ( as I do) that Jesus was bodily resurrected. And Paul also knew (as I do) what it means to be born again of the Holy Spirit. But YET Neither Paul or I believe the first resurrection is past already. So Amil doctrine is false doctrine. It is written…. Psalm 16:10 For thou wilt not...

Paul knew Jesus was bodily resurrected already YET Paul did not consider the first resurrection to be past already. In fact Paul warned about this false doctrine. 2 Timothy 2:16-18 King James Version 16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And...

The words “when he comes”is talking about the second coming of Christ which has not happened yet.

Paul knew Jesus was bodily resurrected already YET Paul did not consider the first resurrection to be past already. In fact Paul warned about this false doctrine. 2 Timothy 2:16-18 King James Version 16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And...

I refer you back to the OP.

They are claiming that and so are you if you believe Rev. 20:1-6 is fulfilled already. I know they do because they say the thousand years reign on earth started already. The Amil errors are not hard to figure out unless someone is also under this strong delusion.