Search results

You make no sense. It'd be the same conscience choice required to willfully commit sin which they, infants, cannot do. Therefore, there's nothing to be removed. There's no such thing as origin sin. It's unscriptural man made-up nonsense.

The process is the process; it doesn't change. It requires belief and faith, confession of your belief, repentance, and water baptism for the forgiveness of your sins. That's the process.

The New Testament or covenant didn't begin until after his death (read Hebrews 9:16-17); so, all his words and actions were under the old covenant which was done away with upon the new covenant/testament being established.

No. Zero

The church is the body of Christ. You don't join the body (the church), but you are rather added to it by the Lord upon being baptized in his name after which you are added to the body by him. Read Acts 2:38-47

The thief on the cross went to the 3rd Heaven, paradise, not sheol. So what's the distinction? He was forgiven by the Lord.

Keep dreaming ✨️

Keep dreaming ✨️

Believe what you like. You don't know what you're talking about. Goodbye

You have it backwards. Acts 19 was the rule or the exception. Read the account of Simon the sorcerer in Acts 8:8 18And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money, For Acts 10:43 to be all that's necessary, you have to throw out...

You cherrypick scripture and do not consider all relevant scriptures. And yes, it is the gospel of salvation if you believe, but it also requires your obedience. Belief will not save your soul. Belief doesn't remit sins. Belief doesn't add you to the church. Keep dreaming.

I did say a baptized believer. Also, that's another reason infant baptism makes zero sense: they haven't believed. And regarding Paul, you have to read a bit further in that letter regarding. Paul planted and Apollos watered 1 Cor 3:6

A baptized believer is indwelt with the Holy Spirit not simply a believer.

The only way the miraculous gifts were manifested other than Acts 10, which was not the norm and unique as a sign the Gentiles could be brought into the church, was by the laying on of the apostle's hands as shown by Acts 19 with Paul. The Gentiles did not have the indwelling of the Spirit nor...

I personally like and use the KJV, but it is not flawless and one must be aware if it's flaws such as it's total misleading mistranslation using the word Easter for "pascha", which means passover in Acts 12:4.

You are not understanding Acts 10 nor are you understanding Acts 2:38. The gift (singular, not gifts) of the Holy Ghost in Acts 2:38, is the Holy Ghost or Spirit itself which everyone receives upon baptism, and NOT the gifts obtained by or through the Spirit, those listed in 1 Cor 12:8-10, that...

Not so. What scriptures say or infer that? There are none! And read the letters that Paul wrote.

No, I don't need another bible. What statement was being made by the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 and to whom was his conversion made a public statement to?? It was him and Philip there in the middle of nowhere! You don't know what you're talking about.

Goodbye, you don't know what you're talking about and obviously can't read or willfully choose to ignor the scriptures.

You are somehow missing the point. Belief alone is not enough. If you believe, then you'll do something about it and then be obedient, but your belief is vain if you don't follow through with it by being obedient. You can cherrypick scriptures all you want in an attempt to justify your erroneous...