Search results

It’s not a sin to have a different interpretation of scripture I use scripture to interpret scripture

It is impossible for the description of the beast to be a single man Yes the Egyptian plagues were literal

Of course scripture can’t lie but it can be misunderstood. Satan also isn’t literally bound but he is restricted from doing certain things like he was bound or restricted from killing Job Revelation 20:1-3 And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in...

Your thinking physical when only our world is physical the spiritual world spiritual. I see revelation 16:12-15 different from you it is a symbolic description of literal events The frogs aren’t literal but symbolic for unclean deceiving spirits

But that verse says unbelievers I’m talking about believers. Since the cross multi millions of gentiles have become believers. The power of the gospel binds satan from deceiving the person who accepts the gospel

I don’t see satan as physically bound and locked up only bound by the spirit from deceiving the nations through the power of the gospel

Once again sure but it’s spiritual battle. Battles can be physical and spiritual Remember Ephesians 6:12-13 King James Version 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual...

Which can happen if the binding is spiritual

Sure but I see the battle as spiritual we the church are the surrounded ones from satans armies not Jerusalem

Well the book of Job was before the cross I see the binding as spiritual satan cannot deceiving the ones with the Holy Spirit and since the cross people from all nations are saved

I think the real question is what exactly is the binding? Matthew 18:18 18 “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

I guess you’re being sarcastic and sorry if your not but why be that way if I corrected you? Yes I know where Rome came from but my point is that Peter in Acts chapter 2 states that he was in the days of Joel chapter 2 and Jerusalem was destroyed by Rome shortly after Peter said those words...

The sign was that Jesus is in heaven. Jesus wasn’t killed because He claimed to be the messiah He was killed because He claimed to be God. Matthew 26:64-66 62 Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, “Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing...

No they were the 4 generals who became kings over 4 sectors of the Grecian empire after Alexander the Great. Verse 6 was about Tyre selling the Jews to the Greeks

But the Romans did do what Jesus said would happen

Well I think this was one but the verse I quoted you in Luke 19 was here it is again Luke 19:43-44 41 As he approached Jerusalem and saw the city, he wept over it 42 and said, “If you, even you, had only known on this day what would bring you peace—but now it is hidden from your eyes. 43 The...

I still have no idea why you are bringing this up the 12 tribes? All I am saying is that the church was made up of the faithful before and after the cross of both Jew and gentile and God used the 12 apostles and the 12 tribes to give us His message

Well those are your words not mine I didn’t say or believe all of what you said Once again I think that we need love and grace in our debates

Because they represent the church See post #71

God does use women to do His work the women are in the 1000 Galatians 3:28 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.