Search results

Exactly! --That's the point. The sad thing is, we have also been given the truth, and it has been avoided like an elephant in the room and not believed. This will be the cause of "weeping and gnashing of teeth." A good example just happened recently in the church my wife and I were attending...

Jesus gave the answer to Nicodemus. And you know this, yet you have not reconciled it with all that He also said and is written ("dodgeball"). So, if you would like to reconcile "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." John 3:6, "And the Lord...

Indeed, there is a side to all this (the truth from God) that breaks all things down into the even daily details and increments and moment to moment terms of men and this world...that more importantly "is the same yesterday, today, and forever" in God--if in fact the one position is being left...

I see where and how one would think that, but the "new birth" refers rather to regeneration "in Him", not of our old flesh or new flesh, or even anything of us, but of Him. This must all be reconciled with the many things that refer to our life "in Him", even the saying that "it is no longer we...

I will break it down. First, Jesus' use of the word "again" is actually stated by definition in the original language as born "from above." Either way, the idea is that we are already born--just not first from "above" and therefore must also be born "again", as He says, of the "Spirit." So we...

Thanks. Do be careful with the "physical" part, as the physical elements of the creation of this [old] world are being destroyed with fervent heat and with fire. 2 Peter 3:10-12

Certainly God is not out of the equation, but I would say, no. But rather that it has occurred as a means of revelation and disclosure of all who are implemented in their crimes against we the people. Bide is just one of the public figureheads.

If I may... It meant what it has always meant since the beginning when God created them male and female. Which is the "image" created in mankind of man being taken out of God, not actually whole but alone and separated from God. Which image in addition to earlier references to the Bride and...

There are still some issues with that technically...but no biggy, I think we understand one another. But I will add that Jesus was referring to the waters above and below the firmament. So the one birth (being born of a woman) is of the waters below..actual water as we know it, and yet His...

On the contrary, you offend these little ones with your misrepresentation and misunderstanding of what is written. For God made them "a living being", but in that day when they ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil--they died; "And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the...

:) I don't disagree, and yet that is not the point, but rather that they all hold the same condemnation, the wages of which is death--even the whole world is to be destroyed, the elements of which have committed no sin.

It would appear that you misunderstand. If making an image of God is wrong--then God is most wrong, for He made us all in His own image. But that is not the issue for which He commanded-- not the making of "images", but rather He command not making "carved" or "graven" images...simply meaning...

It is easy to cast stones here, although it should not be so. We are all (with the one exception being Christ) found guilty of sin. Thus, standing elbow to elbow with the likes of all who are in the eyes of God equally guilty of sin as if we too were homosexual...one ought not to be pointing...

In Jesus' explanation to Nicodemus about being born again, He does not equate water birth with spiritual birth (as you might even seem to be doing above), but as being distinctly different. Regardless, the idea of water birth meaning water baptism, is just plain silly if not stupid. The key...

The exception to “Let the one who does wrong; still be wrong” as it is also written in Revelation 22:11 ("He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”), is that...

No.

The subject of the "lie" foretold by the Apostle Paul (1) and the cause of "strong delusion" (which Peter (2) referred to and foretold as caused by "false teachers" bringing "destructive doctrines" into the church, that according to John (3) was "already in the world" at that time...is what they...

I claim nothing, but find it hard to conceal the truth that has been given to me.

With very little exception, all of Christendom has been affected and suffers under the foretold strong delusion. As for the return of Christ, that is the subject of the "lie" referred to by Paul. The when and how of Jesus' return has been falsely taught since the early days of the church.

I have given the answer in your thread.