Search results

The promise to their children per Acts 2:39 is for the gift of the Holy Ghost, not promising baptism. The RCC cannot give babies the Holy Ghost. This are speaking of their adult children, AKA) future generations.... ....and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39 For the promise is...

The RCC is 100% doctrine change. The RCC does not even resemble the Acts church in the slightest.

The son's name is "son"? Is that RCC doctrine or did you make up that whopper?

Yes, RCC peer pressure can be enormous when one is faced with obeying Acts 2:38.

The command is to baptize in the name of the son, which you can’t figure out

The church was not commissioned to preach to and baptize infants

Sure, but not for doctrine changes

Bah humbug?

What is the name of the son per Matt 28:19, if thou canst tell?

"Jesus Christ" works too.

I see. We assume the roles of the original 12 as we become "the new and improved doctrine of the Apostles"?

As in "stuff"?

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus... Ask your priest to help your reading skills.

They have been dead for 2000 years. They don't teach.

God made her the mother of His human son.

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus... ...Awkward.

No book in the RCC archives?

Only those that have initially obeyed Acts 2:38.

She gave birth to Jesus

He got Mary pregnant.